PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

V Craig Jordan

Publications and source records attributed to V Craig Jordan.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Deregulation of estrogen induced telomerase activity in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells.

Telomerase, a ribonucleoprotein enzyme that functions as a reverse transcriptase, is detected exclusively in immortal cells such as germ cells, stem cells and cancer cells. Telomerase activity is present in almost all human cancers. Telomerase activation is considered to be essential to maintain the integrity of the replicating tumor cell and to establish immortality. Based on this concept antiestrogen should initially regulate estrogen-stimulated telomerase but the enzyme would be expected to be constitutive in tamoxifen-resistant tumor cells. We have studied the estrogen regulation of telomerase in T47D:A18 breast cancer cells with a TRAPEZE Telomerase detection kit. Estradiol significantly increased telomerase activity after a 2-day treatment. Telomerase activity induced by estradiol was up to 10-fold higher within 4 days. Antiestrogens 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) and ICI 182,780 were inactive alone and significantly blocked estradiol-stimulated increase in telomerase. These effects were correlated with changes in cell replications and changes in the cell cycle. In contrast, 4-OHT resistant T47D:A18 cells (T47D:A18/4-OHT, cultured in 1 microM 4-OHT for 6 months) grew spontaneously and had no changes in the cell cycle with estrogen treatment. The estrogen receptor (ERalpha) was present and still regulated at an estrogen responsive luciferase reporter gene with estrogen despite the fact that progesterone receptor was not increased in response to estradiol in T47D:A18/4-OHT cells. However, telomerase activity was increased about 40-fold in T47D:A18/4-OHT cells and this was not regulated by ICI 182,780. We conclude that the differential regulation of telomerase gene might be an important transition for tamoxifen resistance in T47D:A18 breast cancer cells.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonists promote TRAIL-induced apoptosis by reducing survivin levels via cyclin D3 repression and cell cycle arrest.

Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a promising cancer therapy that preferentially induces apoptosis in cancer cells. However, many neoplasms are resistant to TRAIL by mechanisms that are poorly understood. Here we demonstrate that human breast cancer cells, but not normal mammary epithelial cells, are dramatically sensitized to TRAIL-induced apoptosis and caspase activation by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) agonists of the thiazolidinedione (TZD) class. Although TZDs do not significantly alter the expression of components of the TRAIL signaling pathway, they profoundly reduce protein levels of cyclin D3, but not other D-type cyclins, by decreasing cyclin D3 mRNA levels and by inducing its proteasomal degradation. Importantly, both TRAIL sensitization and reduction in cyclin D3 protein levels induced by TZDs are likely PPARgamma-independent because a dominant negative mutant of PPARgamma did not antagonize these effects of TZDs, nor were they affected by the expression levels of PPARgamma. TZDs also inhibit G(1) to S cell cycle progression. Furthermore, silencing cyclin D3 by RNA interference inhibits S phase entry and sensitizes breast cancer cells to TRAIL, indicating a key role for cyclin D3 repression in these events. G(1) cell cycle arrest sensitizes breast cancer cells to TRAIL at least in part by reducing levels of the anti-apoptotic protein survivin: ectopic expression of survivin partially suppresses apoptosis induced by TRAIL and TZDs. We also demonstrate for the first time that TZDs promote TRAIL-induced apoptosis of breast cancer in vivo, suggesting that this combination may be an effective therapy for cancer.

Apoptosis↗

Estrogen receptor expression and sensitivity to paclitaxel in breast cancer.

A retrospective analysis of CALGB trial 9344 suggested paclitaxel administration following cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin adjuvant chemotherapy is most beneficial for patients with ERalpha negative (ERalpha-) breast cancer. Since the cytotoxic effects of paclitaxel are cell cycle dependent, we postulated that the relationship between ERalpha and the effectiveness of adjuvant paclitaxel reflects the observation that ERalpha positive (ERalpha+) breast cancers proliferate more slowly than ERalpha- breast cancers. Three in vitro models (MCF-7, T47D and ZR-75) were examined to compare growth rates and paclitaxel-induced apoptosis in ERalpha+ and ERalpha- clones of the same, originally ERalpha+ cell line. For the T47D and ZR-75 cell lines, loss of ERalpha was associated with a decrease in doubling time and an increase in paclitaxel sensitivity. However, when cell culture conditions were altered to achieve equivalent cell proliferation rates, no difference in paclitaxel sensitivity was observed. Similarly, an ERalpha- clone of MCF-7 cells that did not exhibit an enhanced growth rate compared to its ERalpha+ counterpart also did not show increased paclitaxel sensitivity. The combined apoptotic effects of tamoxifen and paclitaxel on MCF-7 cells were not synergistic or even clearly additive. In these in vitro models, the effectiveness of paclitaxel correlated more closely with growth rate than ERalpha expression. These data suggest that measurements of tumor proliferation may provide more accurate predictive markers for the benefits of adjuvant paclitaxel than ERalpha analysis.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗

Acceptance of tamoxifen chemoprevention by physicians and women at risk.

BACKGROUND: In the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) P-1 trial, tamoxifen was shown to reduce breast carcinoma risk by 49% in high-risk women. The purpose of the current study was to identify factors associated with being offered, and accepting, tamoxifen chemoprevention. METHODS: The records of 219 women who sought risk evaluation after the publication of the NSABP P-1 trial between September 1998 and October 2002 were reviewed. Risk was calculated using the model of either Gail et al. or Claus et al. The impact of individual risk factors on the offering and acceptance of tamoxifen was compared using the Fisher exact test and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Tamoxifen was offered to 137 women (63%) in the current study. The magnitude of Gail risk, age, menopausal status, hysterectomy, and history of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) or atypical hyperplasia (AH) were all found to be significant predictors of a patient being offered tamoxifen. On multivariate analysis, only a history of AH or LCIS and hysterectomy were found to be significant, with odds ratios of 20.3 and 3.4, respectively. Fifty-seven of the women who were offered tamoxifen (42%) took the drug. Only a history of LCIS or AH and older age were found to be predictive of tamoxifen acceptance. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, risk due to AH or LCIS was found to be the main predictor of being offered and accepting tamoxifen chemoprevention.

Adult↗

Interaction of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand 6-methyl-1,3,8-trichlorodibenzofuran with estrogen receptor alpha.

The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon 6-methyl-1,3,8-trichlorodibenzofuran (MCDF) is related to the industrial byproduct dioxin and is a weak agonist and partial antagonist at the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). Tamoxifen is used for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer and interferes with the interaction of estrogen with estrogen receptor alpha (ER). The combination of MCDF and tamoxifen lowered the effective dose of both drugs required to inhibit 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced mammary tumor growth in rats and protected against the estrogenic effects of tamoxifen on the uterus in rats (A. McDougal et al., Cancer Res 2001;61:3902-7), pointing to the potential use of MCDF in breast cancer treatment. Potential AhR-ER cross-talk is evidenced by the antiestrogenic activity of MCDF and the degradative effect of MCDF on ER protein levels. Our studies confirmed that MCDF degraded the ER. MCDF displayed antiestrogenic activity at higher concentrations in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells, but MCDF alone (10(-6) M) stimulated the growth of MCF-7 cells. MCDF also activated an estrogen response element (ERE)-luciferase reporter and increased mRNA levels of the estrogen-responsive gene transforming growth factor (TGF)-alpha. The estrogenic effects of MCDF are ER dependent because they were blocked by the pure antiestrogen ICI 182,780. MCDF induced ER-coactivator interaction in glutathione S-transferase pull-down assays and the formation of an ER.ERE complex in gel mobility shift assays, further indicating that the estrogenic actions of MCDF are mediated by the ER. In addition, knockdown of the AhR with small interfering RNA did not affect MCDF-induced ERE-luciferase activity. Overall, these data support the conclusion that MCDF is a partial agonist at the ER. This study provides the first evidence for the direct interaction of the ER with MCDF and challenges the view that MCDF is simply an AhR-specific ligand.

Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins↗

The biological role of estrogen receptors alpha and beta in cancer.

The temporal and tissue-specific actions of estrogen are mediated by estrogen receptors alpha and beta. The ERs are steroid hormone receptors that modulate the transcription of target genes when bound to ligand. The activity of these transcription factors is regulated by a variety of factors, including ligand binding, phosphorylation, coregulators, and the effector pathway (ERE, AP1, SP1). The end result of target gene transcription is to modulate physiological processes, such as reproductive organ development and function, bone density, and unfortunately contribute to the growth and development of breast and endometrial cancer. The complex biological effects mediated by ER alpha and ER beta involve communication between many proteins and signaling pathways. An ultimate goal of current research is to enhance the value of the separate estrogen receptors as targets for therapeutic intervention.

Animals↗

Estrogenic effects of resveratrol in breast cancer cells expressing mutant and wild-type estrogen receptors: role of AF-1 and AF-2.

Resveratrol, a hydroxystilbene found in grapes and wine, has previously been shown to be a non-flavonoid phytoestrogen, and to act as an estrogen receptor (ER) superagonist in MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with estrogen-responsive reporter constructs. Several additional hydroxystilbenes, including diethylstilbestrol (DES) and piceatannol, were tested, and all showed ER agonism or partial agonism, but superagonism was specific to resveratrol. Moreover, superagonism was observed in cells carrying a stably integrated reporter gene, indicating that this phenomenon is not a result of transient transfection. To examine the role of the transcriptional activation function (AF) domains of ERalpha in resveratrol agonism, we compared the effects of resveratrol and estradiol (E2) on expression of exogenous reporter genes and an endogenous estrogen-regulated gene (TGFalpha) in MDA-MB-231 cells stably transfected with wild-type (wt) ERalpha or mutants with deleted or mutated AF domains. In reporter gene assays, cells expressing wtERalpha showed a superagonistic response to resveratrol. Deletion of AF-1 or mutation of AF-2 attenuated the effect of resveratrol disproportionately compared to that of E2, while deletion of AF-2 abrogated the response to both ligands. In TGFalpha expression assays, resveratrol acted as a full agonist in cells expressing wtERalpha. Deletion of AF-1 attenuated stimulation by E2 more severely than that by resveratrol, as did deletion of AF-2. In contrast, mutation of AF-2 left both ligands with a limited ability to induced TGFalpha expression. In summary, the effect of modifying or deleting AF domains depends strongly on the ligand and the target gene.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Selective estrogen receptor modulation: concept and consequences in cancer.

Extended exposure to the selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) such as raloxifene to prevent osteoporosis and tamoxifen or the aromatase inhibitors to treat or prevent breast cancer are established therapeutic strategies. However, there are now clearly defined consequences of exhaustive antihormonal therapy in breast cancer. Ultimately, drug resistance to SERMs and aromatase inhibitors enhances cancer cell survival but a paradoxical supersensitivity to estrogen action develops that causes cancer cell apoptosis. The future exploitation of these novel data will allow selective killing of cancer with fewer side effects for patients.

Apoptosis↗

The consequences of exhaustive antiestrogen therapy in breast cancer: estrogen-induced tumor cell death.

Forty years ago, the endocrine treatment for breast cancer was a last resort at palliation before the disease overwhelmed the patient (1). Ovarian ablation was the treatment of choice for the premenopausal patient, whereas either adrenalectomy or, paradoxically, high-dose synthetic estrogen therapy were used for treatment in postmenopausal patients. A reduction or an excess of estrogen provoked objective responses in one out of three women. Unfortunately, there was no way of predicting who would respond to endocrine ablation, and because so few patients responded there was no enthusiasm for developing new endocrine agents. All hopes for a cure for breast cancer turned to appropriate combinations of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Today tamoxifen, a nonsteroidal antiestrogen (2), has proven to be effective in all stages of premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer, and several new endocrine strategies, including aromatase inhibitors, luteinizing-hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) superagonists, and a pure antiestrogen (fulvestrant), are now available for breast cancer treatment. Additionally, tamoxifen and raloxifene, a related compound, are used to reduce the risk of breast cancer and osteoporosis, respectively, in high-risk groups (3). Hormonal modulation and strategies to prevent the actions of estrogen in the breast are ubiquitous. However, with successful changes in treatment strategies comes the consequence of change. This minireview will describe the current strategies for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer and present emerging new concepts about the consequences of exhaustive antiestrogen treatment on therapeutic resistance.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Paradoxical action of fulvestrant in estradiol-induced regression of tamoxifen-stimulated breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Long-term tamoxifen treatment of breast cancer can result in tamoxifen-stimulated breast cancer, in which estrogen inhibits tumor growth after tamoxifen withdrawal. We investigated the molecular mechanism(s) of estradiol-induced tumor regression by using an in vivo model of tamoxifen-stimulated human breast cancer. METHODS: Growth of parental estradiol-stimulated MCF-7E2 and long-term tamoxifen-stimulated MCF-7TAMLT xenografts in athymic mice was measured during treatment with vehicle, estradiol, estradiol plus tamoxifen, tamoxifen alone, estradiol plus fulvestrant, or fulvestrant alone. Apoptosis was detected by the terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay. Protein expression was assessed by western blot analysis. mRNA expression was assessed by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: MCF-7E2 tumor growth was stimulated by estradiol (cross-sectional area at week 13 = 1.06 cm2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.82 to 1.30 cm2; P<.001) compared with control (0.06 cm2, 95%CI = -0.02 to 0.14 cm2), but tumor growth was inhibited by tamoxifen or fulvestrant. MCF-7TAMLT tumor growth was stimulated by tamoxifen) cross-sectional area at week 10 = 0.60 cm2, 95% CI = 0.50 to 0.70 cm2; P<.001) compared with control (0.02 cm2, 95% CI = 0.00 to 0.04 cm2). For MCF-7TAMLT tumors that were initially 0.35 cm2, estradiol-induced regression to 0.18 cm2 (95% CI = 0.15 to 0.21 cm2; P<.001), and tamoxifen or estradiol plus fulvestrant enhanced tumor growth to 1.00 cm2 (95% CI = 0.88 to 1.22 cm2). Estradiol increased the number of apoptotic cells in tumors by 23% (95% CI = 20% to 26%; P<.001) compared with all other treatments, decreased estrogen receptor alpha(ERalpha) protein expression, increased the expression of Fas mRNA and protein, decreased the expression of HER2/neu mRNA and protein and nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB) protein but did not affect Fas ligand protein expression compared with control. Paradoxically, fulvestrant reversed this effect and stimulated MCF-7TAMLT tumor growth apparently through ERalpha-mediated regulation of Fas, HER2/neu, and NF-kappaB. CONCLUSION: Physiologic levels of estradiol induced regression of tamoxifen-stimulated breast cancer tumors, apparently by inducing the death receptor Fas and suppressing the antiapoptotic/prosurvival factors NF-kappaB and HER2/neu.

Animals↗

Apoptotic action of 17beta-estradiol in raloxifene-resistant MCF-7 cells in vitro and in vivo.

BACKGROUND: Resistance to tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), involves changes that prevent apoptosis and enhance cell proliferation and survival. Paradoxically, estrogen treatment inhibits the growth of long-term tamoxifen-treated breast tumors. Because of the increasing use of raloxifene, another SERM, to prevent osteoporosis and potentially reduce breast cancer risk, some women will develop raloxifene-resistant breast cancer. We developed a raloxifene-resistant MCF-7 cell model (MCF-7/Ral) and investigated the nature of raloxifene-resistant breast cancer and its response to estradiol. METHODS: Raloxifene resistance and hormone responsiveness were assessed by proliferation assays and cell cycle analysis in parental MCF-7 and MCF-7/Ral cells. Nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB) activity was investigated with a transient transfection assay. Apoptosis was investigated by annexin V staining, mRNA was measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction, and protein was measured by western blotting. Tumorigenesis was studied by injecting MCF-7 or MCF-7/Ral cells into ovariectomized athymic mice (10 per group) and monitoring tumor size weekly. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Basal NF-kappaB activity was higher in MCF-7/Ral cells (1.6 U, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2 to 2.0 U) than in MCF-7 cells (0.8 U, 95% CI = 0.4 to 1.1 U; P =.004). When cultured with 1 microM raloxifene, MCF-7/Ral cells grew statistically significantly (P<.001) faster than MCF-7 cells. Estradiol treatment of MCF-7/Ral cells arrested cells in G(2)/M phase of the cell cycle, decreased NF-kappaB activity (0.2 U, 95% CI = 0.2 to 0.3 U; P<.001), increased expression of Fas protein and mRNA (4.5-fold, 95% CI = 2.8- to 6.3-fold versus 0.5-fold, 95% CI = 0.3- to 0.8-fold for control treatment; P<.001), and induced apoptosis. Treatment with either raloxifene or tamoxifen stimulated MCF-7/Ral tumor growth, suggesting that such tumors were resistant to both drugs. When a 9-week raloxifene or tamoxifen treatment was followed by a 5-week estradiol treatment, estradiol statistically significantly reduced the size of tumors stimulated by raloxifene or tamoxifen (at week 14, P =.004 for raloxifene and P<.001 for tamoxifen). CONCLUSIONS: Growth of raloxifene-resistant MCF-7/Ral cells in vitro and in vivo is repressed by estradiol treatment by a mechanism involving G2/M-phase arrest, decreased NF-kappaB activity, and increased Fas expression to induce apoptosis.

Animals↗

Distinct molecular conformations of the estrogen receptor alpha complex exploited by environmental estrogens.

We have advanced the view that estrogens activate the estrogen receptor (ER) alpha complex differently. A group of planar (estradiol, genistein, and coumestrol) and nonplanar (methoxychlor and its mono- and didemethylated phenolic metabolites) environmental estrogens, which are all full estrogens in MCF-7 breast cancer cell proliferation assays, was shown to segregate discretely into planar and nonplanar groups. These groups were delineated using a novel assay of mutant ER cDNAs stably transfected into MDA-MB-231 cells and the activation of the transforming growth factor alpha target gene in situ that putatively describes the external shape of the ER complex. Planar compounds activate estrogen action through the two traditional activation functions (AFs), AF1 and AF2, in the ER. In contrast, nonplanar compounds can activate estrogen action through AF1 and the amino acids Asp-351 and Asp-538, which are exposed when helix 12 silences AF2. The observation that class I (planar) and class II (nonplanar) compounds have different mechanisms of estrogen action may have important implications for tissue selective modulation of the ER.

Cell Line, Tumor↗

Introducing a new section to Breast Cancer Research: endocrinology and hormone therapy.

Endocrine therapy is increasingly understood as the conceptual basis for the future treatment and prevention of breast cancer. Endocrine agents have considerably changed the approach to targeted treatment during the past two decades, and select endocrine agents have advanced the goal of preventing breast cancer. Progress has occurred because of a vigorous interaction between laboratory scientists and the clinical trials community. Breast Cancer Research is launching a new section on endocrinology and hormone therapy in order to invigorate this exchange and challenge our readers with novel concepts that might result in enhanced survival in breast cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗

Resveratrol acts as an estrogen receptor (ER) agonist in breast cancer cells stably transfected with ER alpha.

Resveratrol (Res) is a phytoestrogen found in grapes and present in red wine. Res has been shown to function as an estrogen receptor (ER) agonist, but it remains unclear whether it may also exert antagonist activity. Our aim was to study the effects of Res at both the molecular (TGFalpha gene activation) and the cellular (cell growth) levels in breast cancer cells stably transfected with wild-type (wt) ER(D351) and mutant (mut) ER (D351Y). TGFalpha mRNA induction was used as a specific marker of estradiol (E(2)) responsiveness. Res caused a concentration-dependent (10(-8)-10(-4) M) stimulation of TGFalpha mRNA, indicating that it acts as an estrogen agonist in these cell lines. The pure antiestrogen ICI 182,780 (ICI) blocked Res-induced activation of TGFalpha, consistent with action through an ER-mediated pathway. Further studies that combined treatments with E(2) and Res showed that Res does not act as an antagonist in the presence of various (10(-11)-10(-8) M) concentrations of E(2). To determine whether Res can be classified as a type I or type II estrogen (Jordan et al., Cancer Res 2001;61:6619-23,), we examined Res with the D351G ER in the TGFalpha assay and found that Res belongs to the type I estrogens. Both Res and E(2) had concentration-dependent growth inhibitory effects in cells expressing wtER and D351Y ER. Although the pure antiestrogen ICI blocked the growth inhibitory effects of E(2), it did not block the inhibitory effects of Res, suggesting that the antiproliferative effects of Res also involve ER-independent pathways. Interestingly, Res differentially affected the levels of ER protein in these 2 cell lines: Res down-regulated wtER levels while significantly up-regulating the amount of mutD351Y ER. Co-treatment with ICI resulted in strongly reduced ER levels in both cell lines. Gene array studies revealed Res-induced up-regulation of more than 80 genes, among them a profound activation of p21(CIP1)/WAF1, a gene associated with growth arrest. The p21(CIP1)/WAF1 protein levels measured by Western blotting confirmed Res-induced significant up-regulation of this protein in both cell lines. In summary, Res acts as an ER agonist at low doses but also activates ER-independent pathways, some of which inhibit cell growth.

Breast Neoplasms↗

MICoA, a novel metastasis-associated protein 1 (MTA1) interacting protein coactivator, regulates estrogen receptor-alpha transactivation functions.

The transcriptional activity of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-alpha) is modified by coactivators, corepressors, and chromatin remodeling complexes. We have previously shown that the metastasis-associated protein-1 (MTA1), a component of histone deacetylase and nucleosome remodeling complexes, represses ER-driven transcription by recruiting histone deacetylases to the estrogen receptor element (ERE)-containing target gene chromatin in breast cancer cells. Using a yeast two-hybrid screening to clone MTA1-interacting proteins, we identified a previously uncharacterized molecule, which we named as MTA1-interacting coactivator (MICoA). Our findings suggest that estrogen signaling promotes nuclear translocation of MICoA and that MICoA interacts with MTA1 both in vitro and in vivo. MICoA binds to the C-terminal region of MTA1, whereas MTA1 binds to the N-terminal MICoA containing one nuclear receptor interaction LSRLL motif. We showed that MICoA is an ER coactivator, cooperates with other ER coactivators, stimulates ER-transactivation functions, and associates with the endogenous ER and its target gene promoter chromatin. MTA1 also repressed MICoA-mediated stimulation of ERE-mediated transcription in the presence of ER and ER variants with naturally occurring mutations, such as D351Y and K303R, and that it interfered with the association of MICoA with the ER-target gene chromatin. Because chromatin is a highly dynamic structure and because MTA1 and MICoA could be detected within the same complex, these findings suggest that MTA1 and MICoA might transmodulate functions of each other and any potential deregulation of MTA1 is likely to contribute to the functional inactivation of the ER pathway, presumably by derecruitment of MICoA from ER target promoter chromatin.

Amino Acid Sequence↗