Antiestrogens and selective estrogen receptor modulators as multifunctional medicines. 1. Receptor interactions.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to V Craig Jordan.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We previously reported stable transfection of estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) into the ER-negative MDA-MB-231 cells (S30) as a tool to examine the mechanism of action of estrogen and antiestrogens [J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 84 (1992) 580]. To examine the mechanism of ERbeta action directly, we have similarly created ERbeta stable transfectants in MDA-MB-231 cells. MDA-MB-231 cells were stably transfected with ERbeta cDNA and clones were screened by estrogen response element (ERE)-luciferase assay and ERbeta mRNA expression was quantified by real-time RT-PCR. Three stable MDA-MB-231/ERbeta clones were compared with S30 cells with respect to their growth properties, ability to activate ERE- and activating protein-1 (AP-1) luciferase reporter constructs, and the ability to activate the endogenous ER-regulated transforming growth factor alpha (TGFalpha) gene. ERbeta6 and ERbeta27 clones express 300-400-fold and the ERbeta41 clone express 1600-fold higher ERbeta mRNA levels compared with untransfected MDA-MB-231 cells. Unlike S30 cells, 17beta-estradiol (E2) does not inhibit ERbeta41 cell growth. ERE-luciferase activity is induced six-fold by E2 whereas neither 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) nor ICI 182, 780 activated an AP-1-luciferase reporter. TGFalpha mRNA is induced in response to E2, but not in response to 4-OHT. MDA-MB-231/ERbeta clones exhibit distinct characteristics from S30 cells including growth properties and the ability to induce TGFalpha gene expression. Furthermore, ERbeta, at least in the context of the MDA-MB-231 cellular milieu, does not enhance AP-1 activity in the presence of antiestrogens. In summary, the availability of both ERalpha and ERbeta stable breast cancer cell lines now allows us to compare and contrast the long-term consequences of individual signal transduction pathways.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
For more than 25 years, tamoxifen has been the gold standard for the endocrine treatment of all stages of oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer, and the World Health Organization lists tamoxifen as an essential drug for the treatment of breast cancer. It is estimated that more than 400,000 women are alive today as a result of tamoxifen therapy, and millions more have benefited from palliation and extended disease-free survival. Interestingly, tamoxifen also became the first cancer chemopreventive approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the reduction of breast-cancer incidence in both pre- and post-menopausal women at high risk. However, 40 years ago, it was hard to imagine that a non-toxic targeted treatment for breast cancer could be developed at all.
The identification of the estrogen receptor (ER) in the laboratory provided a mechanism to describe the target site specificity of estrogen action in uterus, vagina, pituitary gland, and breast cancer. Most importantly, a test was established to predict the outcome of antihormonal therapy in breast cancer, and a target was identified to develop new drugs for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer. The development of tamoxifen for the treatment of all stages of ER-positive breast cancers has resulted in the improved survival of breast cancer patients. However, the recognition of selective ER modulation, i.e., estrogen-like action in bones and lowering circulating cholesterol but antiestrogenic actions in breast and uterus, has resulted in the development of multifunctional medicines with the goal of preventing not only breast and uterine cancer but also osteoporosis and coronary heart disease.
Estrogen receptor alpha (ER) is a ligand-activated transcription factor implicated in breast cancer growth. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), such as tamoxifen (4-OHT), bind to the ER and affect the position of helix 12, thereby influencing coregulator binding and ER transcriptional activation. Previous studies have shown that a triple mutation in helix 12 (3m; D538A/E542A/D545A) caused a change in ER stability and obliterated 4-OHT action (Liu, H., Lee, E. S., de los Reyes, A., Zapf, J. W., and Jordan, V. C. (2001) Cancer Res. 61, 3632-3639). Two approaches were taken to determine the role of individual mutants (D538A, L540Q, E542A, and D545A) on the activity and stability of the 4-OHT.ER complex. First, mutants were evaluated using transient transfection into ER-negative T47D:C4:2 cells with an ERE3-luciferase reporter, and second, transforming growth factor alpha (TGFalpha) mRNA was used as a gene target in situ for stable transfectants of MDA-MB-231 cells. Transcriptional activity occurred in the presence of estrogen in all of the mutants, although a decreased response was observed in the L540Q, 3m, and D538A cells. The 3m and D538A mutants lacked any estrogenic responsiveness to 4-OHT, whereas the other mutations retained estrogen-like activity with 4-OHT. Unlike the other mutants, the ER was degraded in the D538A mutant with 4-OHT treatment. However, increasing the protein levels of the mutant with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 did not restore the ability of 4-OHT to induce TGFalpha mRNA. We suggest that Asp-538 is a critical amino acid in helix 12 that not only reduces the estrogen-like actions of 4-OHT but also facilitates the degradation of the 4-OHT.D538A complex. These data further illustrate the complex role of specific surface amino acids in the modulation of the concentration and the estrogenicity of the 4-OHT.ER complex.
Glands of wild-type (WT) and progesterone receptor knockout (PRKO) mice were exposed to 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) while cultured in serum-free medium containing insulin, prolactin, aldosterone, and cortisol. Glands of WT but not PRKO mice responded to DMBA with epithelial hyperplasia after 10 days in this medium. After culture without prolactin and adrenocortical hormones for an additional 14 days, hyperplastic lesions were present only in glands of WT mice. We conclude that in the absence of PR, epithelial structures are resistant to the carcinogenic action of DMBA.
Building on the 30-year success story with tamoxifen, the question now is whether one agent can be used for treatment and prevention or should new medicines be targeted to specific applications? The early results with anastrozole suggest it could replace tamoxifen for treatment and should be tested as a preventive. Unfortunately, long-term testing of aromatase inhibitors will be required to avoid concerns about osteoporosis, Alzheimer's disease and coronary heart disease. Most importantly, the knowledge gained with tamoxifen has resulted in a new generation of selective oestrogen receptor modulators that can be used to prevent osteoporosis, breast cancer and uterine cancer. It is now clear that strategies utilising aromatase inhibitors and selective oestrogen receptor modulators will provide much needed options for individualised treatments.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs) are a new class of drugsthat bind to estrogen receptor (ER) and elicit agonistic or antagonistic responses, depending on the target tissue. We have developed an in vitro system in which some SERMs (4-hydroxytamoxifen and resveratrol) demonstrate estrogenic response through wild-type (wt) ER, whereas others (raloxifene and GW7604) remain antiestrogenic. This system mimics the tamoxifen-resistant phenotype in clinic, when resistant tumors contain wtER. We used Atlas cDNA arrays to study gene expression profiles after ER activation by different SERMs in MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells stably transfected with wtER. Cells were treated with estradiol, four different SERMs, and the pure antiestrogen ICI 182,780. The obtained expression data were analyzed using GeneSpring software. Real-time reverse transcription-PCR was used to verify the array data. Our results showed that treatment with various compounds altered the expression of a diverse group of genes, revealing sets of overlapping genes that may represent a complex network of genes of interrelated signal transduction pathways. Sets of "agonistic" and "antagonistic" genes were identified on the basis of the known response to different SERMs. Further analysis of selected sets of genes revealed functionally related group of genes in each set, encoding proteins that were related to cell proliferation, survival, and apoptosis. Flow cytometry data indicated an antiapoptotic activity in cells treated with agonists versus apoptotic activity in cells treated with antagonists. A model for estradiol-like (survival) and antiestrogen-like (apoptosis) activities of SERMs on the basis of their gene expression profiles is suggested.
BACKGROUND: In patients with early-stage breast cancer, 5 years of treatment with the selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) tamoxifen reduces breast cancer recurrence and mortality, whereas more than 5 years of tamoxifen does not further reduce breast cancer recurrence and doubles the risk of endometrial cancer. We evaluated the effects on tumor growth of raloxifene, another SERM, after tamoxifen treatment in mouse models of breast and endometrial cancers. METHODS: Athymic, ovariectomized mice were bitransplanted with tumors derived from human breast cancer and endometrial cancer cells that either were tamoxifen-naive or had been exposed to tamoxifen for short (6 months) or long (>5 years) terms. The effects of raloxifene (two dose levels) and tamoxifen on tumor growth in the presence and absence of low-dose estrogen were evaluated. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Raloxifene was less effective than tamoxifen in blocking the stimulatory effects of low-dose estrogen on the growth of tamoxifen-naive breast (P<.001) and endometrial (P =.001) tumors. Raloxifene and tamoxifen had similar inhibitory effects on the growth of short-term tamoxifen-exposed breast tumors. Raloxifene and tamoxifen had similar stimulatory effects on the growth of breast and endometrial tumors that had been exposed to at least 5 years of tamoxifen. However, neither drug blocked the stimulatory effects of estrogen on the growth of these tumors. Raloxifene was less effective than tamoxifen (P<.001) in blocking the stimulatory effects of estrogen on endometrial tumors that had been exposed to tamoxifen in the past. CONCLUSIONS: Raloxifene and tamoxifen had similar effects on these mouse models of tamoxifen-naive and tamoxifen-resistant breast and endometrial cancer. Treatment with raloxifene following 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen may not further decrease breast cancer recurrence and may increase endometrial cancer incidence.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: The effects of antiestrogens on angiogenesis in breast cancer are not fully defined. In this study we investigated the in vitro effects of antiestrogens at different concentrations on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer cells. METHODS: The dose-dependent effects of 17beta-estradiol (E2), 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4OHT), and ICI182,780 were analyzed both with reference to growth rates and VEGF protein production using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in MCF-7 cells. RESULTS: E2 stimulated both the growth rates and VEGF production of MCF-7 cells in the same manner. Although 4OHT stimulated the growth rates as an agonistic effect in an estrogen-free media at levels ranging from 1 nM to 1 micro M, it did not stimulate VEGF expression at the same levels except for at 1 micro M. Although 4OHT had a weak agonistic effect on VEGF production at 1 micro M in an estrogen-free media, it significantly inhibited E2-stimulated VEGF production at the same level. A cytotoxic effect was observed with 10 micro M 4OHT that paradoxically caused a prominent increase in VEGF production. ICI182,780 had no significant effects on the growth rates or VEGF production in this cell line. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the hypothesis that tamoxifen could inhibit angiogenesis induced by estrogens in ER-positive breast cancer cells.
Drug resistance to tamoxifen (Tam) is a significant clinical problem but the mechanism through which this occurs remains elusive. We have developed a number of xenograft models of Tam-stimulated growth that model breast cancer progression using estrogen receptor positive MCF-7 or T47D breast cancer cells. When estrogen-stimulated T47D:E2 tumors are treated long term with Tam, Tam-stimulated tumors develop (T47D:Tam) that are stimulated by both estrogen and Tam. When HER-2/neu status is determined, it is clear that the T47D:Tam tumors express significantly higher levels of HER-2/neu protein by immunohistochemistry and mRNA as measured by real-time RT-PCR. The T47D:Tam tumors also express higher levels of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor protein than their estrogen-stimulated T47D:E2 counterparts. We compared out results to the MCF-7 model of Tam-stimulated growth. The MCF-7:Tam ST (estrogen- and Tam-stimulated) and MCF-7:Tam LT (estrogen-inhibited, Tam-stimulated) were bilaterally transplanted to account for any mouse to mouse variation and characteristic growth patterns were observed. TUNEL staining was performed on MCF-7:Tam LT treated with either estrogen or Tam and it was concluded that estrogen-inhibited tumor growth was a result of increased apoptosis. Three phases of tumor progression are described that involve increases in HER-2/neu expression, de-regulation of estrogen receptor expression and increases in apoptosis which in concert determine the phenotype of drug resistance to Tam.
Tamoxifen is the most widely used hormonal treatment for all stages of breast cancer and has been approved for the prevention of breast cancer in high-risk women. The observation that tamoxifen acts as an antioestrogen on the breast but has paradoxical oestrogenic effects on bones and lipids heralded the development of the selective oestrogen-receptor modulators (SERM). Raloxifene, another of these drugs, is being used to prevent osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, but it seems, like tamoxifen, to prevent breast cancer. The molecular basis for these target-site-specific actions remains unclear but may involve the relative expressions of coregulatory proteins in target tissues. Several new SERM agents are in clinical development in an attempt to decrease the unwanted effects. Furthermore, two different classes of hormonal agents, the aromatase inhibitors and oestrogen-receptor downregulators, which have no oestrogen-like properties at any site, are promising new treatments for breast cancer.
Tamoxifen has not only proved to be a valuable treatment for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, but is also a pioneering medicine for chemoprevention in high-risk pre- and postmenopausal women. Insights into the pharmacology and toxicology of tamoxifen have led to the recognition of selective ER modulators (SERMs) with estrogen-like actions in maintaining bone density and in lowering circulating cholesterol, but antiestrogenic actions in the breast. Raloxifene, a related SERM, is now available to treat osteoporosis and is also being tested as a preventive for breast cancer and coronary heart disease. Emerging knowledge about the action of SERMs will provide clues for the design of mechanism-based medicines.