PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

V M LoLordo

Publications and source records attributed to V M LoLordo.

18 recordsLinked to original sources

Effect of food restriction on acquisition and expression of a conditioned odor discrimination in mice.

Level of food restriction was manipulated in mice to assess its importance for the acquisition and expression of a conditioned odor discrimination. In training, animals were exposed to odors (either rose or lemon) presented on a piece of filter paper in a pot covered in bedding. For half of the conditioning trials, group paired received one odor (CS+) with sucrose, the unconditioned stimulus (us), under the bedding. For the remaining trials, they received the other odor (CS-) alone. Group CS-alone was also exposed to both odors, but neither odor was paired with sugar on any of the conditioning trials. During training, Group Paired mice that were food-restricted tended to dig more readily and longer in the odors, especially in the CS+ odor, than animals that were not restricted. Both restricted and nonrestricted PAIRED GROUPS dug more in the CS+ than in the CS- by the end of training, but the CS-alone mice dug very little in either. Following training, mice were exposed to both odors simultaneously in a discrimination test. Half the mice in each training food restriction condition were tested under food restriction, and half were not. Only PAIRED animals that were food-restricted in the test expressed an odor discrimination, digging only in the CS+. This occurred regardless of their previous restriction state in training. These data suggest that both food-restricted and nonrestricted mice can acquire an odor discrimination; however, expression of this odor discrimination depends on food restriction.

Animals↗

A simple and reliable test of olfactory learning and memory in mice.

The present paper describes a quick and efficient method for assessing olfactory discrimination learning in mice. In training mice received trials in which one odor (CS+) was paired with sugar and another odor (CS-) was paired with no sugar. When the mice were subsequently placed in a chamber with CS+ odor at one end and CS- odor at the other, they spent more time digging in CS+ than in CS- odor. In Experiment 2 mice trained with this procedure and tested after 60 days also spent more time digging in CS+ than CS- in the test phase, indicating that this olfactory discrimination task is effective for assessing long-term memory. In addition to the outbred strain of CD1 mice used in Experiments 1 and 2, C57Bl/6NCr/BR and DBA/2NCr/BR mice used in Experiment 3 also acquired this learned odor discrimination. Moreover, Experiment 4 showed that DBA animals were capable of acquiring this odor discrimination after receiving only two training trials (one exposure each to CS+ and CS-) per day for 4 days.

Animals↗

Failure to find postshock increases in ethanol preference.

Volpicelli at al. (Alcohol Clin Exp Res 14:913-916, 1990) found that rats given a choice between drinking 5% ethanol and water showed enhanced ethanol preference after daily sessions of shock, relative to No-Treatment controls. In our first experiment, rats were given a choice between 5% ethanol and isocaloric sucrose after daily sessions of shock. On shock days, rats received either 2 or 60 shocks over 1 hr. The 60-Shock group increased its ethanol preference from the baseline phase to the postshock phase, whereas the 2-Shock group decreased its ethanol preference from the baseline phase to the shock phase. However, the ethanol preferences of the two groups were not significantly different from each other during any phase. In four subsequent experiments, Shock, No-Shock, and No-Treatment groups were given a choice between 5% ethanol and water. The experiments varied on: whether the treatments and measurements of consumption occurred in the light versus dark phase of the cycle, and whether there was one measurement per day or four. Baseline ethanol preference varied widely between experiments. In none of the experiments did shock differentially enhance ethanol preference. The findings of Volpiceli et al. were not replicated.

Alcohol Drinking↗

Time cues block the CS, but the CS does not block time cues.

Analysis of conditioned defensive freezing in rats revealed that prior pairings of a tone conditioned stimulus (CS) and footshock in Context 1 at Time 1 failed to give that tone CS the power to block conditioning to Context 2 at Time 2. This failure of an excitatory CS to block conditioning of time cues was not reciprocal. When the stimulus roles were reversed, excitatory time cues blocked conditioning to the tone CS. This asymmetry in blocking is best explained by the notion that time cues have special access to the association-formation mechanism.

Animals↗

Reexamination of contextual conditioning with massed versus distributed unconditioned stimuli.

Sprague-Dawley rats were placed in the black compartment of a 2 compartment choice apparatus and received a series of unsignaled footshocks at fixed intertrial intervals (ITIs), with ITI duration varied across groups. Contextual conditioning was assessed using place preference and freezing tests. In Experiments 1 and 3, time spent in the unshocked, white compartment in a preference test decreased monotonically with increasing ITI. In Experiment 2, less freezing occurred in the 3-s than in the 60-s groups. An inverted U-shaped relationship between ITI and freezing emerged when a full range of ITIs was used in Experiment 3. The results have implications for the learning-performance distinction and suggest that short ITIs may promote contextual conditioning.

Animals↗

Retraction of Ross and LoLordo findings concerning blocking in serial feature-positive discriminations.

Findings concerning the effectiveness of stimuli from various conditioning procedures in blocking conditioned excitation and occasion-setting functions of an added stimulus in a serial feature-postive discrimination training procedure (LoLordo & Ross, 1987; Ross & LoLordo, 1986, 1987) are retracted. Videotapes on which the published data were based were rescored by 2-5 people, most of whom were uninformed about group memberships of the subjects. In no case did the rescoring confirm any of the orginal findings of blocking. Possible factors contributing to the discrepancies are discussed. The experiments should be repeated with feature stimuli that are less similar to each other and with several scorers, at least one of whom is unaware of the group assignment of the subjects.

Retraction Notice↗

Evaluation of the relation between Pavlovian occasion-setting and instrumental discriminative stimuli: a blocking analysis.

Experiments with rat subjects used a blocking design (A+, then AB+) to assess the relation between Pavlovian occasion-setting and instrumental discriminative stimuli. Prior conditioning of both associative and occasion-setting functions of A in a serial feature-positive procedure blocked acquisition of an instrumental discriminative function by a novel stimulus (B) trained in compound with A. However, neither prior conditioning of only an A-US (unconditioned stimulus) association nor prior conditioning of Stimulus A using a Pavlovian simultaneous feature-positive procedure, which does not endow A with an occasion-setting function, blocked acquisition of an instrumental discriminative function by B. Prior acquisition of an instrumental discriminative function by A blocked acquisition of a Pavlovian occasion-setting function by a novel stimulus (B) trained in compound with A, but did not block acquisition of an association between B and the US. These outcomes indicate that Pavlovian occasion-setting and instrumental discriminative properties of a stimulus are functionally equivalent and that both Pavlovian occasion-setting and instrumental discriminative properties of a stimulus are functionally independent of simple associative relations between that stimulus and other events.

Animals↗

Control of fluid palatability by exteroceptive Pavlovian signals.

Tastes elicit a set of palatability-dependent orofacial and somatic responses in rats. We investigated whether discrete auditory conditioned stimuli that signal the availability or onset of unconditioned taste stimuli (sucrose, quinine) can control orofacial responses in the absence of those unconditioned stimuli. In Experiment 1, one auditory stimulus (CS+) was paired with the delivery of a sucrose solution to the magazine floor, and another auditory stimulus (CS-) was never followed by sucrose. Following conditioning, oral infusions of water that were preceded by the CS+ were found to elicit more ingestive (sucrose-typical) orofacial responses than did water alone or water preceded by the CS-. In Experiment 2, the conditioned ingestive reactions to a signal for sucrose observed in Experiment 1 again occurred, and conditioned aversive (quinine-typical) orofacial responses occurred in response to water infusions preceded by a former signal for quinine. These data suggest that perceived palatability may be influenced by Pavlovian associations involving exteroceptive conditioned stimuli. Further, they illustrate the importance of supporting stimuli in modulating the effects of Pavlovian associations upon behavior.

Animals↗

The effect of post-conditioning exposure to morphine on the retention of a morphine-induced conditioned taste aversion.

In the following experiment, multiple injections of morphine sulfate following the acquisition of a morphine-induced taste aversion had no effect on the retention of the previously acquired aversion. Post-conditioning injections of morphine resulted in the development of physical dependence to morphine and led to a decrement in the ability of morphine to induce a subsequent aversion to a second novel taste. This failure of post-conditioning exposures to morphine to affect a previously acquired morphine-induced taste aversion even though tolerance to morphine had occurred was discussed in the context of Rescorla's event-memory model of conditioning.

Animals↗

Drug exposure and the acquisition and retention of a conditioned taste aversion.

Two experiments examined the effects of preexposure and postexposure to a drug on the acquisition and retention of a conditioned taste aversion induced by that drug. Experiment 1 demonstrated that although drug preexposure attenuated a subsequent conditioned aversion, repeated taste-drug pairings reversed the initial attenuation effect and resulted in nearly complete avoidance of consumption. Experiment 2, however, demonstrated that drug postexposure did not alter a previously established conditioned aversion, although the postexposure experiences were effective in attenuating a conditioned aversion to a second novel solution. It was suggested that conditioned aversions are mediated by ACTH and that preexposure to a drug results in tolerance to that drug, yielding a smaller ACTH response and thereby a weaker aversion.

Animals↗

Control by the auditory or the visual element of a compound discriminative stimulus: effects of feedback.

Groups of pigeons were trained to depress a treadle in the presence of a compound stimulus consisting of a tone and a red houselight (a) to avoid electric shock, or (b) to obtain grain. Immediate, exteroceptive feedback was equated for avoidance and appetitive groups within an experiment, but varied across experiments from elevation of a nonilluminated feeder to darkening of the chamber, termination of the tone, and elevation of an illuminated feeder. Responding in the absence of the compound stimulus postponed its next occurrence. After performance had stabilized, the degree to which each element controlled treadle pressing was determined. Generally, in the appetitive tests, the red light controlled much more responding than did the tone, but in the avoidance tests, the tone controlled more responding than did the red light.

Acoustic Stimulation↗