Diagnostic pathways in acute pulmonary embolism: recommendations of the PIOPED II Investigators.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Acute Disease↗
Biomedical subjects
Victor F Tapson
Publications and source records attributed to Victor F Tapson.
Randomized study of adding inhaled iloprost to existing bosentan in pulmonary arterial hypertension.
RATIONALE: Small, open-label studies suggest that combinations of existing therapies may be effective for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding inhaled iloprost, a prostacyclin analog, to the endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan in patients with PAH. METHODS: In a randomized, multicenter, double-blind trial, inhaled iloprost (5 mug) or placebo was added to stable monotherapy with bosentan for 12 wk. Efficacy endpoints included change from baseline in 6-min-walk distance (6-MWD), modified New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, hemodynamic parameters, and time to clinical worsening. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 67 patients with PAH (55% idiopathic PAH, 45% associated PAH, 94% NYHA class III, and mean baseline 6-MWD of 335 m) were randomized. At Week 12, patients receiving iloprost had a mean increase in 6-MWD of 30 m (p = 0.001); placebo patients had a mean 6-MWD increase of 4 m (p = 0.69), with a placebo-adjusted difference of +26 m (p = 0.051). NYHA status improved by one class in 34% of iloprost versus 6% of placebo patients (p = 0.002). Iloprost delayed the time to clinical worsening (p = 0.0219). Improvements were noted in postinhalation placebo-adjusted change in mean pulmonary artery pressure (-8 mm Hg; p < 0.001) and pulmonary vascular resistance (-254 dyn x s x cm(-5); p < 0.001). Combination therapy was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of a relatively small sample size, results of this study demonstrate that the addition of inhaled iloprost in patients with PAH with reduced exercise capacity on bosentan monotherapy is safe and efficacious.
Adolescent↗
Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism.
BACKGROUND: The accuracy of multidetector computed tomographic angiography (CTA) for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism has not been determined conclusively. METHODS: The Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis II trial was a prospective, multicenter investigation of the accuracy of multidetector CTA alone and combined with venous-phase imaging (CTA-CTV) for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. We used a composite reference test to confirm or rule out the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. RESULTS: Among 824 patients with a reference diagnosis and a completed CT study, CTA was inconclusive in 51 because of poor image quality. Excluding such inconclusive studies, the sensitivity of CTA was 83 percent and the specificity was 96 percent. Positive predictive values were 96 percent with a concordantly high or low probability on clinical assessment, 92 percent with an intermediate probability on clinical assessment, and nondiagnostic if clinical probability was discordant. CTA-CTV was inconclusive in 87 of 824 patients because the image quality of either CTA or CTV was poor. The sensitivity of CTA-CTV for pulmonary embolism was 90 percent, and specificity was 95 percent. CTA-CTV was also nondiagnostic with a discordant clinical probability. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, multidetector CTA-CTV has a higher diagnostic sensitivity than does CTA alone, with similar specificity. The predictive value of either CTA or CTA-CTV is high with a concordant clinical assessment, but additional testing is necessary when the clinical probability is inconsistent with the imaging results.
Acute Disease↗
Extended-duration thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients with recent reduced mobility: methodology for the EXCLAIM study.
BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity in medical patients. Although thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin reduces the risk of VTE in these patients, the optimal duration of therapy is not currently known. The EXCLAIM (EXtended CLinical prophylaxis in Acutely Ill Medical patients) study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of extended-duration thromboprophylaxis using enoxaparin with the standard regimen of enoxaparin in acutely ill medical patients with recent reduced mobility. METHODS: All enrolled acutely ill medical patients receive enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously once daily for 10 +/- 4 days. Eligible patients are then randomized in a blinded manner to receive either extended-duration thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously once daily or placebo subcutaneously once daily for an additional 28 +/- 4 days. The primary efficacy endpoint is the incidence of VTE during the 28 +/- 4 days after randomization. This study utilizes a standardized bilateral compression ultrasonography examination protocol that consists of an intensive interrogation of the deep veins of the lower extremities for proximal deep-vein thrombosis. The secondary efficacy endpoints are the rate of symptomatic VTE during the 3 months after randomization and mortality at 3 and 6 months after enrollment. The primary safety endpoint is the incidence of major hemorrhagic complications during the 28 +/- 4 days after randomization. RESULTS: To date, 3,983 patients, with a broad range of medical conditions, have been included in the study. Almost one third of the enrolled patients with reduced mobility are acutely ill due to respiratory insufficiency and one third have infectious diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The EXCLAIM study is designed to show the efficacy and safety of extended-duration thromboprophylaxis using enoxaparin in acutely ill medical patients with recent reduced mobility, which may potentially lead to a reduction in the incidence of late VTE events in these patients. The EXCLAIM (EXtended CLinical prophylaxis in Acutely Ill Medical patients) study, involving 4,726 acutely ill medical patients with recent reduced mobility, is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of extended-duration thromboprophylaxis using 40 mg once daily enoxaparin (38 +/- 4 days) with the standard regimen for enoxaparin (40 mg once daily for 10 +/- 4 days). The objective of this study is to demonstrate that the extended-duration enoxaparin regimen is an effective and safe thromboprophylaxis regimen out of hospital.
Adult↗
Diagnostic pathways in acute pulmonary embolism: recommendations of the PIOPED II investigators.
PURPOSE: To formulate comprehensive recommendations for the diagnostic approach to patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, based on randomized trials. METHODS: Diagnostic management recommendations were formulated based on results of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis II (PIOPED II) and outcome studies. RESULTS: The PIOPED II investigators recommend stratification of all patients with suspected pulmonary embolism according to an objective clinical probability assessment. D-dimer should be measured by the quantitative rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the combination of a negative D-dimer with a low or moderate clinical probability can safely exclude pulmonary embolism in many patients. If pulmonary embolism is not excluded, contrast-enhanced computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CT angiography) in combination with venous phase imaging (CT venography), is recommended by most PIOPED II investigators, although CT angiography plus clinical assessment is an option. In pregnant women, ventilation/perfusion scans are recommended by many as the first imaging test following D-dimer and perhaps venous ultrasound. In patients with discordant findings of clinical assessment and CT angiograms or CT angiogram/CT venogram, further evaluation may be necessary. CONCLUSION: The sequence for diagnostic test in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism depends on the clinical circumstances.
Acute Disease↗
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare disease that results from obstruction of the major pulmonary arteries by incompletely resolved or organized pulmonary emboli that have become incorporated into the pulmonary artery wall, eventually causing an increase in pulmonary vascular resistance. From 0.1 to 4.0% of patients recovering from acute pulmonary embolism develop CTEPH. Without intervention, CTEPH is a progressive and lethal disease for which there is no effective medical therapy. Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the treatment of choice. Careful pre- and postoperative management is essential for a successful outcome after PEA. Lung transplantation is indicated only in few cases when PEA is not feasible. In 1994, we started a program (in Pavia, Italy) in which members of a multidisciplinary team work closely with the aim of increasing experience in the challenging problems these patients present in the evaluative, surgical, and postoperative phases of their care. To date, 134 PEAs have been performed. Preoperatively, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class distribution was three class II, 56 class III, and 75 class IV patients, respectively; mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance values were 47 +/- 13 mm Hg and 1149 +/- 535 dyn/s/cm (-5), respectively. The overall operative mortality has been 9.7% (4.5% in 2004). Survival at 3-month, 1-year, and 3-year follow-up was 89.5 +/- 2.6%, 87.8 +/- 2.9%, and 83.3 +/- 3.5%, respectively; this last rate was unchanged up to 10 years. After PEA, mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance values were 25 +/- 9 mm Hg and 322 +/- 229 dyn/s/cm (-5), respectively, and these results were stable over time. At the 3-year follow-up, 94% of patients were in NYHA class I or II and were being treated with oral anticoagulants only.
Chronic Disease↗
Safety and efficacy of IV treprostinil for pulmonary arterial hypertension: a prospective, multicenter, open-label, 12-week trial.
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a life-threatening disease for which both continuous IV epoprostenol and continuous subcutaneous treprostinil have proven effective. With continuous IV treprostinil having potential advantages over both of the above therapies, we investigated the safety and efficacy of this regimen in patients with PAH. METHODS: We conducted a 12-week, prospective, open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter study of continuous IV treprostinil in 16 patients with PAH that was idiopathic (n = 8), related to connective tissue disease (n = 6), or related to congenital heart disease (n = 2). The primary end point was change from baseline to week 12 in exercise capacity assessed by the 6-min walk (6MW) test. RESULTS: Continuous IV treprostinil increased 6MW distance (mean +/- SE) by 82 m from baseline (319 +/- 22 m) to week 12 (400 +/- 26 m) [n = 14; p = 0.001]. There were also significant improvements in the secondary end points of Naughton-Balke treadmill time (p = 0.007), Borg dyspnea score (p = 0.008), and hemodynamics (mean pulmonary artery pressure, p = 0.03; cardiac index, p = 0.002; pulmonary vascular resistance, p = 0.001) at week 12 compared with baseline. Side effects were mild and consistent with those reported with prostacyclin treatment. One death, unrelated to study drug, occurred during the 12-week study in a patient who received 3 days of treprostinil and died 2 weeks later. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term IV infusion of treprostinil is safe and appears to be effective for the treatment of patients with PAH.
Adult↗
Incidence and prevalence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: from acute to chronic pulmonary embolism.
The incidence and prevalence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) are yet to be accurately determined and may be significantly underestimated. Historically, the occurrence of CTEPH in patients diagnosed with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) has been considered rare. Data from autopsy studies estimated the incidence of CTEPH at 1-3% overall and at 0.1-0.5% in patients surviving acute PE. Data indicate that each year in the United States, approximately 600,000 individuals suffer an acute pulmonary embolic event and that the annual number of new CTEPH cases in the United States is between 500 and 2,500. This may underestimate the true frequency of CTEPH because the disease is often misdiagnosed due to nonspecific symptoms and variable disease course. A monocenter, prospective, longitudinal study assessing symptomatic CTEPH in patients with acute PE but without prior venous thromboembolism recently estimated the cumulative incidence of CTEPH to be 1.0% 6 mo after PE, 3.1% after 1 yr, and 3.8% after 2 yr; overall post-PE incidence was approximately 3%. Further studies are needed to better define the true rate of CTEPH. Acute embolic events can occur without symptoms, and symptomatic PE is often overlooked or misdiagnosed in practice. CTEPH is often identified during diagnostic work-up in patients with unexplained pulmonary hypertension, many of whom lack medical history suggesting previous PE. In a recent study in 142 consecutive patients with CTEPH, 90 (63%) had no previous history of symptomatic venous thromboembolism. Further prospective epidemiologic studies are needed to better define the incidence and prevalence of CTEPH.
Acute Disease↗
Hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation and a high risk of stroke are not being provided with adequate anticoagulation.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine both treatment gaps and predictors of warfarin use in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients enrolled in a national multicenter study. BACKGROUND: The National Anticoagulation Benchmark Outcomes Report (NABOR) is a performance improvement program designed to benchmark anticoagulation prophylaxis, treatment, and outcomes among participating hospitals. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of inpatients was performed at 21 teaching, 13 community, and 4 Veterans Administration hospitals in the U.S. Patients with an ICD-9-CM code for AF (427.31) were randomly selected. RESULTS: Among the 945 patients studied, the mean age was 71.5 (+/- 13.5) years; 43% were >75 years of age, 54.5% were men, and 67% had a history of hypertension. Most (86%) had factors that stratified them as at high risk of stroke, and only 55% of those received warfarin. Neither warfarin nor aspirin were prescribed in 21% of high-risk patients, including 18% of those with a previous stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolic event. Age >80 years (p = 0.008) and perceived bleeding risk (p = 0.022) were negative predictors of warfarin use. Persistent/permanent AF (p < 0.001) and history of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolus (p = 0.014) were positive predictors of warfarin use, whereas high-risk stratification was not. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the under-use of warfarin, but also adds to published reports in several regards. It showed that risk stratification, the guidepost for treatment in international guidelines, had little effect on warfarin use, and that age >80 years and AF classification (permanent/persistent) are factors that influence warfarin use.
Aged↗
A nitric oxide processing defect of red blood cells created by hypoxia: deficiency of S-nitrosohemoglobin in pulmonary hypertension.
The mechanism by which hypoxia [low partial pressure of O(2) (pO(2))] elicits signaling to regulate pulmonary arterial pressure is incompletely understood. We considered the possibility that, in addition to its effects on smooth muscle, hypoxia may influence pulmonary vascular tone through an effect on RBCs. We report that exposure of native RBCs to sustained hypoxia is accompanied by a buildup of heme iron-nitrosyl (FeNO) species that are deficient in pO(2-)governed intramolecular transfer of NO to cysteine thiol, yielding a deficiency in the vasodilator S-nitrosohemoglobin (SNO-Hb). S-nitrosothiol (SNO)-deficient RBCs produce impaired vasodilator responses in vitro and exaggerated pulmonary vasoconstrictor responses in vivo and are defective in oxygenating the blood. RBCs from hypoxemic patients with elevated pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) exhibit a similar FeNO/SNO imbalance and are thus deficient in pO(2)-coupled vasoregulation. Chemical restoration of SNO-Hb levels in both animals and patients restores the vasodilator activity of RBCs, and this activity is associated with improved oxygenation and lower PAPs.
Animals↗
Transition from intravenous epoprostenol to intravenous treprostinil in pulmonary hypertension.
RATIONALE: Intravenous epoprostenol improves exercise capacity and survival in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. The prostacyclin analog treprostinil is also efficacious by subcutaneous infusion, is easier to administer, and has a longer half-life. With the demonstration of bioequivalence between subcutaneous and intravenous treprostinil, intravenous treprostinil may have an overall better risk-benefit profile than intravenous epoprostenol. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transitioning patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension from intravenous epoprostenol to intravenous treprostinil. METHODS: Patients enrolled in a 12-wk prospective open label study were switched from intravenous epoprostenol to intravenous treprostinil over 24 to 48 h. The intravenous treprostinil dose was adjusted to minimize symptoms/side effects. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (mean age, 43 yr; 22 women) were enrolled. Twenty-seven patients completed the protocol; 4 patients transitioned back to epoprostenol. Six-minute walk distance (n = 27; baseline, 438 +/- 16 m; Week 12, 439 +/- 16 m), Naughton-Balke treadmill test time (n = 26; baseline, 582 +/- 50 s; Week 12, 622 +/- 48 s), functional class, and Borg score were maintained with intravenous treprostinil at Week 12 versus intravenous epoprostenol before transition. At Week 12, mean pulmonary artery pressure increased 4 +/- 1 mm Hg (n = 27, p < 0.01), cardiac index decreased 0.4 +/- 0.1 L/min/m2 (n = 27, p = 0.01), and pulmonary vascular resistance increased 3 +/- 1 Wood units x m2 (n = 26, p < 0.01). No serious adverse events were attributed to treprostinil. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that transition from intravenous epoprostenol to intravenous treprostinil is safe and effective; whether the hemodynamic differences associated with intravenous treprostinil are clinically important requires longer follow-up.
Adolescent↗
Antithrombotic therapy practices in US hospitals in an era of practice guidelines.
BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic therapy is efficacious for the prevention of thromboembolic disease, but it necessitates careful risk-benefit assessment. METHODS: Antithrombotic therapy data were retrospectively collected from inpatient medical records at 38 US hospitals. Patients treated for atrial fibrillation, acute myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism and patients given prophylaxis for total knee replacement, total hip replacement, or hip fracture surgery between July 1, 2000, and June 30, 2003, were randomly selected. RESULTS: The medical records of 3778 patients (53.3% men) were included. The mean patient age was 66.1 years. Of patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk for stroke, only 54.7% received warfarin sodium, and 20.6% received neither aspirin nor warfarin. Of patients with acute myocardial infarction, only 75.5% received aspirin on hospital arrival. After orthopedic surgery procedures, only 85.6% of patients received prophylaxis with a parenteral anticoagulant agent or warfarin. In 49.4% of patients with deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or both, unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin use was discontinued before an international normalized ratio of 2.0 or greater was achieved for 2 consecutive days. Patients with deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism were rarely discharged from the hospital with bridge therapy (an injectable anticoagulant agent plus warfarin), although the length of hospitalization was significantly shorter than if discharged taking warfarin alone (4.0 vs 8.1 days; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A significant percentage of hospitalized patients do not receive adequate antithrombotic therapy for the primary and secondary prevention of thromboembolic disease.
Aged↗
Identification, diagnosis and treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis: a registry of prolonged heparin use and thrombocytopenia among hospitalized patients with and without cardiovascular disease. The Complication After Thrombocytopenia Caused by Heparin (CATCH) Registry steering committee.
BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is estimated to occur in 1-5% of all patients receiving heparin, and 25-50% of such cases develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITT) A conservative estimate based only on cardiovascular patients suggests that in the United States approximately 100,000 patients develop thrombocytopenia, and 25-50,000 develop HITT annually. Both HIT and HITT are associated with high morbidity and mortality and represent substantial worldwide public health concerns. REGISTRY DESIGN: The objective of the Complication After Thrombocytopenia Caused by Heparin (CATCH) Registry is to identify the incidence of HIT and/or HITT in patients treated with systemic heparin (unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin) in contemporary practice. Additional objectives include to: (1) provide a comprehensive database of patients with suspected HIT or HITT, (2) monitor and define clinical events, including thrombocytopenia, thrombosis, and mortality among patients treated with prolonged (> 96 hours) heparin, (3) describe the incidence and outcomes of HIT and HITT in patients who are treated with heparin and who develop thrombocytopenia in the Coronary Care Unit setting, and (4) document and characterize current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies of suspected HIT. The unblinded registry will record approximately 5,000 patients at 60-80 US hospitals with either prolonged systemic heparin administration or thrombocytopenia and those with suspected HIT or HITT. Enrollment began in the first quarter 2003 and was completed at the end of 2004. IMPLICATIONS: The registry will provide valuable insights to the incidence and consequences of HIT and HITT that will enable improvements in diagnosis and treatment.
Cardiovascular Diseases↗
The response to inhaled nitric oxide in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension is not masked by baseline vasodilator use.
BACKGROUND: Assessment of pulmonary vasodilator responsiveness is important in determining the prognosis and management of patients with pulmonary hypertension. Many patients, however, are already on vasodilators at the time of testing. It is unclear if these agents should be temporarily discontinued to improve the sensitivity of testing. METHODS: We examined the hemodynamic effects of nitric oxide (NO) inhalation in 60 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Thirty-one of these patients were receiving medications with vasodilating properties. Vasodilator testing was performed with invasive measurement of pressure of the right side of the heart at baseline and during inhalation of 40 ppm NO. RESULTS: No significant demographic differences were seen between patients receiving and not receiving vasodilators. Similar reductions in mean pulmonary artery pressure (19 +/- 12% vs 20 +/- 12%, P = .734) and pulmonary vascular resistance (31 +/- 18 vs 32 +/- 16, P = .967) were seen in patients receiving and not receiving vasodilators. Using the definition of positive vasodilator response (> or = 20% drop in mean pulmonary artery pressure), 55% (17/31) of patients in the baseline vasodilator group had a positive response compared with 62% (18/29) of the patients not on vasodilators (P = .570). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent use of oral vasodilators does not appear to mask a significant response to inhaled NO on the pulmonary vasculature. Therefore, routine discontinuation of pulmonary vasodilators is likely unnecessary before vasodilator testing in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Administration, Inhalation↗
Thrombosis during pregnancy and the postpartum period.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the circumstances surrounding deep vein thrombosis among pregnant or postpartum patients enrolled in a large multicenter registry. STUDY DESIGN: Consecutive patients with ultrasound-confirmed deep vein thrombosis were enrolled at 183 institutions during a 6-month period from October 2001 to March 2002. Fifty-three who were either pregnant or within 6 weeks postpartum were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-four were pregnant and 19 were postpartum. Among those pregnant, 44% experienced deep vein thrombosis in the first trimester, 24% in the second, and 26% in the third. Deep vein thrombosis occurred in the left lower extremity in 76% of the pregnant and 47% of the postpartum women. Four pregnant and 2 postpartum women had pelvic vein thrombosis. Among those postpartum, 74% had undergone surgery within 3 months. CONCLUSION: During pregnancy, the risk of deep vein thrombosis begins in the first trimester. Thus, we believe that when prophylaxis is indicated, it should be initiated early in gestation.
Adult↗
Treatment of venous thromboembolism: adherence to guidelines and impact of physician knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized patients enrolled in a national, multicenter database. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cohort study that randomly selected VTE patients from 38 academic/teaching, community, and Veterans Administration (VA) hospitals. The study included a physician survey component. The patients selected were those treated between January 2002 and June 2003 who had an ICD-9-CM code for pulmonary embolus (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or pregnancy-related PE or DVT. RESULTS: The study included 939 patients: 52.7% with DVT, 28.4% with PE, and 18.8% with PE and DVT. Mean age was 59.5 years. Risk factors included obesity (body mass index > 30) in 30.1%, history of VTE in 28.0%, malignancy in 27.4%, surgery in 21.1%, and immobility in 18.5%. Only 56.1% of patients were treated with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Bridging from LMWH or unfractionated heparin (UFH) to warfarin was completed during hospitalization in 486 (68.6%), but only 246 (50.6%) had an international normalized ratio (INR) > or = 2 for 48 hours before discontinuation of the injectable anticoagulant. Length of stay in patients discharged on bridge therapy was 4.0 +/- 3.7 days vs 8.1 +/- 5.8 days for patients discharged on warfarin therapy (P < .001). Ninety-two (10.1%) patients were discharged with neither oral nor injectable anticoagulation and had a mean duration of treatment of only 10.6 +/- 16.2 days. Of 245 physicians surveyed from participating hospitals, 84% and 53%, respectively, indicated that LMWH was their preferred agent for treatment of DVT and treatment of PE. With regard to warfarin, 30% did not believe it was necessary to have a therapeutic INR for > or = 2 days before discontinuing LMWH or UFH, and 27% responded that it was necessary to keep DVT patients in the hospital until they were therapeutic. CONCLUSIONS: In this cross-section of United States hospitals, lower than anticipated use of LMWH, insufficient bridging from UFH or LMWH to warfarin, and continuation of anticoagulation after hospitalization were all problems discovered with the treatment of VTE. Physician knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs are partially responsible for the gap between actual practice and international guidelines. These results suggest that hospitals should evaluate their adherence to international VTE treatment guidelines and develop strategies to optimize antithrombotic therapy.
Anticoagulants↗
Brain natriuretic peptide: diagnostic and therapeutic implications in pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Brain or B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is one of the new biomarkers employed within the last decade to help clarify difficult cardiovascular problems. Plasma BNP is elevated in cardiac ventricular dysfunction and plays a key role in protecting the body from volume overload by maintaining renal function and sodium balance. Studies in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have demonstrated that plasma BNP levels are raised proportionally to the extent of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. There is growing evidence that BNP may be a potential biomarker for PAH in screening for occult disease, diagnostic evaluation, prognosis, and estimating a response to therapy. Additionally, augmentation of the natriuretic peptide system through exogenous administration of BNP or by preventing its degradation may be a promising option for the management of decompensated RV failure. Because plasma BNP levels rise in a variety of cardiopulmonary conditions and are affected by several physiological factors, BNP interpretation must not occur in isolation but rather within the context of good clinical judgment.
Biomarkers↗
Development of a research agenda for endovascular treatment of venous thromboembolism: proceedings from a multidisciplinary consensus panel.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical Research↗