PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Vladimir Kvetan

Publications and source records attributed to Vladimir Kvetan.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Surviving severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: utility of open-lung biopsy and large doses of dexamethasone.

The etiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome is wide and mortality is extremely high. We describe a patient dying from severe acute respiratory distress syndrome who had a tremendous recovery after receiving dexamethasone (1 g daily). This patient required positive end-expiratory pressure (up to 18 mm/Hg) and fractional inspiratory oxygen (up to 100%). Thirty-six hours after the large dose of corticosteroids, the respiratory mechanics and oxygenation were acceptable for extubation. Acute respiratory distress syndrome was proven and other etiologies of respiratory failure were ruled out by a bedside open-lung biopsy. The biopsy proven acute respiratory distress syndrome dramatically resolved with this salvage therapy. High-dose usage of corticosteroids for acute respiratory distress syndrome has tremendous potential.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

The incidence of infectious complications of central venous catheters at the subclavian, internal jugular, and femoral sites in an intensive care unit population.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the risk of central venous catheter infection with respect to the site of insertion in an intensive care unit population. The subclavian, internal jugular, and femoral sites were studied. DESIGN: An epidemiologic, prospective, observational study. SETTING: The setting is a well-functioning intensive care unit under a unified critical care medicine division in a university teaching hospital. Critical care medicine attendings and fellows covered on site 17 and 24 hrs per day, respectively. PATIENTS: Patients were critically ill. All patients were triaged into the intensive care unit by on-site critical care medicine fellows. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In an intensive care unit population, we prospectively studied the incidence of central venous catheter infection and colonization at the subclavian, internal jugular, and femoral sites. The optimal insertion site for each individual patient was selected by experienced intensive care physicians (critical care medicine attendings and fellows). All of the operators were proficient in inserting catheters at all three sites. Confounding factors were eliminated; there were a limited number of experienced operators inserting the catheters, a uniform protocol stressing strict sterile insertion was enforced, and standardized continuous catheter care was provided by dedicated intensive care nurses proficient in all aspects of central venous catheter care. Two groups of patients were analyzed. Group 1 was patients with one catheter at one site, and group 2 was patients with catheters at multiple sites. Group 1 was the primary analysis, whereas group 2 was supporting.A total of 831 central venous catheters and 4,735 catheter days in 657 patients were studied. The incidence of catheter infection (4.01/1,000 catheter days, 2.29% catheters) and colonization (5.07/1,000 catheter days, 2.89% catheters) was low overall. In group 1, the incidence of infection was subclavian: 0.881 infections/1,000 catheter days (0.45%), internal jugular: 0/1,000 (0%), and femoral: 2.98/1,000 (1.44%; p = .2635). The incidence of colonization was subclavian: 0.881 colonization/1,000 catheter days (0.45%), internal jugular: 2.00/1,000 (1.05%), and femoral: 5.96/1,000 (2.88%, p = .1338). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of infection and colonization or duration of catheters (p = .8907) among the insertion sites. In group 2, there was also no statistically significant difference in the incidence of infection and colonization among the three insertion sites. CONCLUSION: In an intensive care unit population, the incidence of central venous catheter infection and colonization is low overall and, clinically and statistically, is not different at all three sites when optimal insertion sites are selected, experienced operators insert the catheters, strict sterile technique is present, and trained intensive care unit nursing staff perform catheter care.

Bacterial Infections↗
PubMed2003

Bioterrorism and critical care.

A bioterrorist attack of any kind has the potential to overwhelm a community and, indeed, in the case of smallpox, an entire nation. During such an attack the number of patients requiring hospitalization and specifically critical care is likely to be enormous. Intensivists will be at the forefront of this war and will play an important role in dealing with mass casualties in an attempt to heal the community. A high degree of suspicion and prompt recognition of an event will be required to contain it. Specific knowledge of the possible agents that can be used will be key in managing patients and in estimating the needs of a health care facility and community to deal with the future course of events. Intensivists play various roles aside from the delivery of critical care to the patient in the ICU. These roles include making triage decisions regarding the appropriate use of critical care beds (which automatically dictates how other non-ICU beds are used and managed) and serving as a team member of ethics committees (on such issues as dying, futility, and withdrawal of care). Indeed, intensivists are no strangers to disaster management and have served on the forefront of many. A biologic weapons attack, however, is likely to push this multidimensional nature of the intensivist to the maximum, because such an attack is likely to result in a more homogeneous critically ill population where the number of critical care staff and supplies to treat the victims may be limited. One hopes that such an event will not occur. Sadly, however the events of September 11, 2001, have only heightened the awareness of such a possibility.

Anthrax↗