PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12699324

Bioterrorism and critical care.

Abstract

A bioterrorist attack of any kind has the potential to overwhelm a community and, indeed, in the case of smallpox, an entire nation. During such an attack the number of patients requiring hospitalization and specifically critical care is likely to be enormous. Intensivists will be at the forefront of this war and will play an important role in dealing with mass casualties in an attempt to heal the community. A high degree of suspicion and prompt recognition of an event will be required to contain it. Specific knowledge of the possible agents that can be used will be key in managing patients and in estimating the needs of a health care facility and community to deal with the future course of events. Intensivists play various roles aside from the delivery of critical care to the patient in the ICU. These roles include making triage decisions regarding the appropriate use of critical care beds (which automatically dictates how other non-ICU beds are used and managed) and serving as a team member of ethics committees (on such issues as dying, futility, and withdrawal of care). Indeed, intensivists are no strangers to disaster management and have served on the forefront of many. A biologic weapons attack, however, is likely to push this multidimensional nature of the intensivist to the maximum, because such an attack is likely to result in a more homogeneous critically ill population where the number of critical care staff and supplies to treat the victims may be limited. One hopes that such an event will not occur. Sadly, however the events of September 11, 2001, have only heightened the awareness of such a possibility.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Manoj Karwa, Patricia Bronzert, Vladimir Kvetan. 2003. Bioterrorism and critical care.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-0704(02)00053-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Epidemiological and phylogenetic analysis of anthrax in Kazakhstan in 2024.

BACKGROUND: Anthrax remains an important zoonotic disease in Kazakhstan due to the persistence of environmental reservoirs and long-standing endemic foci. Despite ongoing surveillance, the epidemiological characteristics and genetic diversity of circulating Bacillus anthracis strains in the country remain incompletely understood. METHODS: A retrospective epidemiological and phylogenetic investigation of anthrax outbreaks reported in Kazakhstan during 2024 was conducted. Epidemiological data were collected for all laboratory-confirmed human cases and associated outbreak foci. Confirmation of infection was performed by PCR, and B. anthracis isolates were obtained from clinical, environmental and animal-associated samples. Whole-genome sequencing and core-genome single nucleotide polymorphism (cgSNP) analysis were used to characterize the genetic relationships among isolates and to determine their phylogenetic placement. RESULTS: Nine anthrax outbreaks were identified across four regions of Kazakhstan (Almaty, Zhambyl, Atyrau, and West Kazakhstan), resulting in 20 confirmed human cases. All patients were male, with the highest proportion occurring among individuals aged 36-55 years (45%). The mean patient age was 43.9 years (range: 16-64 years). Most infections were associated with slaughtering infected livestock (65%), followed by handling contaminated meat (15%). PCR confirmed infection in all 20 human cases. Culture yielded 17 human-derived B. anthracis isolates from 14 patients and 17 environmental/animal-derived isolates, resulting in 34 isolates in total. Of these, 22 representative isolates underwent whole-genome sequencing. Phylogenetic analysis revealed the circulation of two major lineages. Isolates from Atyrau and West Kazakhstan clustered within the Trans-Eurasian (TEA/STI) lineage. Atyrau isolates formed a tight cluster differing by only 21-32 cgSNPs, consistent with a shared epidemiolocal source, whereas the West Kazakhstan isolate was highly divergent. Zhambyl and Almaty region belonged to the A.Br.Ames lineage but diverged into two distinct sublineages. Zhambyl region isolates demonstrated minimal divergence from the global reference genome Ames Ancestor, differing by only 16-31 SNPs. Almaty region isolates formed an endemic subclone, separated from the reference group by approximately 114 SNPs. Comparison with the Ames Ancestor and Sterne reference strains demonstrated substantial genetic divergence. CONCLUSION: Anthrax outbreaks in Kazakhstan during 2024 were primarily associated with livestock exposure and occurred within established endemic regions. Whole-genome sequencing revealed the coexistence of distinct TEA and Ames lineages, including evidence of persistent local transmission and long-term evolutionary stability of endemic B. anthracis populations. These findings enhance understanding of anthrax epidemiology in Central Asia and support the integration of genomic surveillance into national outbreak investigation programs.

Anthrax↗

Epidemiological Characteristics of Anthrax and Bacillus anthracis Strains - China, 2020-2024.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of anthrax in China has declined since 1990 but has resurged in recent years. The purpose of this study was to describe the epidemiology of anthrax and Bacillus anthracis (B. anthracis) in China from 2020 to 2024 to inform control strategies. METHODS: A descriptive analysis was performed of case characteristics. B. anthracis strains underwent whole-genome sequencing, and phylogenetic relationships were determined by core-genome single nucleotide polymorphism (cgSNP) and canonical single nucleotide polymorphism (canSNP) analysis. RESULTS: Between 2020 and 2024, 1,870 anthrax cases were reported, with a 0.59% case fatality rate. The majority of cases were cutaneous and the incidence increased from year to year. Cases were distributed across 12 provincial-level administrative divisions (PLADs), with most regions showing an increased incidence between 2021 and 2024. Farmers and herders were the most affected occupational groups, and farmers accounted for an increasing proportion of cases. Cases were primarily concentrated among young and middle-aged men and peaked between July and September. A total of 185 B. anthracis strains were identified in the 12 PLADs and were classified into four sublineages (A.Br.001/002, A.Br.Ames, A.Br.Vollum, and A.Br.005/006). A.Br.001/002 was the most prevalent and widely distributed sublineage. Phylogenetic analysis revealed 14 branches, demonstrating population diversity. Cross-clustering was present among strains from different PLADs. CONCLUSIONS: From 2020 to 2024, anthrax cases generally followed historical patterns but the incidence increased, with broader geographical spread, more diverse clinical types, and interprovincial transmission. These findings highlight the need to strengthen anthrax control efforts, particularly in the central and eastern PLADs.

Anthrax↗