PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W J Gillespie

Publications and source records attributed to W J Gillespie.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Vitamin D and vitamin D analogues for preventing fractures associated with involutional and post-menopausal osteoporosis.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D and related compounds have been used to prevent fractures. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of vitamin D or analogues, with or without calcium, in the prevention of fractures in older people. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group trials register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2005), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and reference lists of articles. Most recent search: March 2005. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised trials comparing vitamin D or an analogue, alone or with calcium, against placebo, no intervention, or calcium, reporting fracture outcomes, in older people. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trial quality, and extracted data. Data were pooled, where admissible, using the fixed-effect model, or random-effects model if the relative risks were heterogeneous. MAIN RESULTS: Vitamin D alone showed no statistically significant effect on hip fracture (seven trials, 18,668 participants, RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.41), vertebral fracture (four trials, 5698 participants, RR (random effects) 1.13, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.55) or any new fracture (eight trials, 18,903 participants, RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.09). Vitamin D with calcium marginally reduced hip fractures (seven trials, 10,376 participants, RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.96), non-vertebral fractures (seven trials, 10,376 participants, RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.97), but there was no evidence of effect of vitamin D with calcium on vertebral fractures. The effect appeared to be restricted to those living in institutional care. Hypercalcaemia was more common when vitamin D or its analogues was given compared with placebo or calcium (14 trials, 8035 participants, RR 2.38, 95% CI 1.52 to 3.71). The risk was particularly high with calcitriol (three trials, 742 participants, RR 14.94, 95% CI 2.95 to 75.61). There was no evidence that vitamin D increased gastro-intestinal symptoms (seven trials, 10,188 participants, RR (random effects) 1.03, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.36) or renal disease (nine trials, 10,107 participants, RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.87). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Frail older people confined to institutions may sustain fewer hip and other non-vertebral fractures if given vitamin D with calcium supplements. Effectiveness of vitamin D alone in fracture prevention is unclear. There is no evidence of advantage of analogues of vitamin D compared with vitamin D. Calcitriol may be associated with an increased incidence of adverse effects. Dose, frequency, and route of administration of vitamin D in older people require further investigation.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in older people.

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture in older people usually results from a fall on the hip. Hip protectors have been advocated as a means to reduce the risk of sustaining a hip fracture. OBJECTIVES: To determine if external hip protectors reduce the incidence of hip fractures in older people following a fall. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group trials register (January 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to January Week 2, 2005), EMBASE (1988 to 2005 Week 02), CINAHL (1982 to December Week 2 2004), other databases and reference lists of relevant articles. We also contacted trialists. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing the use of hip protectors with a control group. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We sought additional information from trialists. Pooling of uncorrected data from cluster-randomised trials was only done on an exploratory basis. MAIN RESULTS: Fifteen included trials contributed data to this updated review. One trial, which was a study of compliance (adherence) lasting 12 weeks, contributed no fracture outcome data. Pooling of data from eleven trials conducted in nursing or residential care settings, including six cluster-randomised studies, showed evidence of a marginally statistically significant reduction in hip fracture incidence (relative risk (RR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 0.97). This analysis showed significant statistical heterogeneity. Pooling of data from three individually randomised trials involving 5135 community dwelling participants, showed no reduction in hip fracture incidence from the provision of hip protectors (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.59). There was no evidence of any significant effect of hip protectors on incidence of pelvic or other fractures. No important adverse effects of the hip protectors were reported but compliance, particularly in the long term, was poor. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Accumulating evidence casts some doubt on the effectiveness of the provision of hip protectors in reducing the incidence of hip in older people. Acceptance and adherence by users of the protectors remain poor due to discomfort and practicality.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Patient-assessed health instruments for the knee: a structured review.

OBJECTIVES: To identify patient-assessed health instruments specific to the knee and review evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness. METHODS: Instruments were identified through systematic searches of the literature. Information relating to instrument content, patient population, reliability, validity and responsiveness was extracted from published papers. RESULTS: The 16 instruments that met the inclusion criteria varied in length from 4 to 42 items. The majority form a single index; six produce a profile of scores. Eight have been evaluated in patients with a variety of knee problems. All instruments have satisfactory internal or test-retest reliability. However, there is limited empirical support for the health domains of six instruments. Patients informed the development of items within just five instruments. Few authors gave explicit consideration to the size of expected relationships in tests of construct validity. Eleven instruments have evidence for responsiveness to changes in health. The minimally important difference was not determined for any of the instruments. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of comparative evidence, the large number of patient-assessed instruments for knee problems makes instrument selection difficult. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Pain Scale and Oxford Knee Score have good evidence for reliability, content validity and construct validity. The KOOS and Oxford instruments also have evidence for responsiveness. The instruments have not been evaluated for all knee problems, and instrument appropriateness, including content relevance, must be assessed before application. The comparative evaluation of instruments is recommended.

Health Status Indicators↗
PubMed2004

Hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture in the elderly usually results from a fall on the hip. Hip protectors have been advocated as a means to reduce the risk of sustaining a hip fracture. OBJECTIVES: To determine if external hip protectors reduce the incidence of hip fractures in elderly persons following a fall. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group trials register (February 2004), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to February Week 2 2004), EMBASE (1988 to 2004 Week 08), CINAHL (1982 to February Week 2 2004), other databases and reference lists of relevant articles. We also contacted trialists. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing the use of hip protectors with a control group. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We sought additional information from all trialists. MAIN RESULTS: An additional trial with 4169 participants was included in this update, giving a total of 14 included trials. One, which was a study of compliance (adherence) lasting 12 weeks, contributed no fracture outcome data. Five studies involving 4316 participants were cluster randomised by care unit, nursing home or nursing home ward rather than by the individual. Each of these studies reported a reduced incidence of hip fractures within those units allocated to receive the protectors. Because the majority of these trials had not been analysed to allow for clustering, pooling of their results was not undertaken. Pooling of data from five individually randomised trials conducted in nursing/residential care settings (1426 participants) showed no significant reduction in hip fracture incidence (hip protectors 37/822, controls 40/604, relative risk (RR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54 to 1.29). Three individually randomised trials of 5135 community dwelling participants, reported no reduction in hip fracture incidence with the hip protectors (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.59). No important adverse effects of the hip protectors were reported but compliance, particularly in the long term, was poor. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence of effectiveness of hip protectors from studies in which randomisation was by individual patient within an institution, or for those living in their own homes. Data from cluster randomised studies indicate that, for those living in institutional care with a high background incidence of hip fracture, a programme of providing hip protectors appears to reduce the incidence of hip fractures. Acceptability by users of the protectors remains a problem, due to discomfort and practicality.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Antibiotics for preventing infection in open limb fractures.

BACKGROUND: Wound and bone infections are frequently associated with open fractures of the extremities and may add significantly to the resulting morbidity. The administration of antibiotics is routinely used in developed countries as an adjunct to a comprehensive management protocol that also includes irrigation, surgical debridement and stabilisation when indicated, and is thought to reduce the frequency of infections. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the evidence for the effectiveness of antibiotics in the initial treatment of open fractures of the limbs. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group specialised register (April 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library issue 1, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2003), EMBASE (1988 to April 2003), LILACS (1992 to June 2002) and reference lists of articles. Proceedings of meetings of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (1980 to 2001), the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (1990 to 2001) and the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Traumatologique (1980 to 2001) were hand searched. We also contacted published researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials involving: participants - people of any age with open fractures of the limbs; intervention - antibiotic administered before or at the time of primary treatment of the open fracture compared with placebo or no antibiotic; outcome measures - early wound infection, chronic drainage, acute or chronic osteomyelitis, delayed unions or non-unions, amputations and deaths. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently screened papers for inclusion, assessed trial quality using an eight item scale, and extracted data. Additional information was sought from three trialists. Pooled data are presented graphically. MAIN RESULTS: Data from 913 participants in seven studies were analysed. The use of antibiotics had a protective effect against early infection compared with no antibiotics or placebo (relative risk 0.41 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27 to 0.63); absolute risk reduction 0.08 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.12); NNT 13 (95% CI 8 to 25)). There were insufficient data in the included studies to evaluate other outcomes. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotics reduce the incidence of early infections in open fractures of the limbs. Further placebo controlled randomised trials are unlikely to be justified in middle and high income countries. Further research is necessary to the determine the avoidable burden of morbidity in countries where antibiotics are not used routinely in the management of open fractures.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗
PubMed2000

Vitamin D and vitamin D analogues for preventing fractures associated with involutional and post-menopausal osteoporosis.

BACKGROUND: Due to their known effects on bone metabolism, Vitamin D and related compounds have been proposed for the prevention of osteoporosis and fractures. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of supplementation with Vitamin D or a Vitamin D analogue in the prevention of fractures of the axial and appendicular skeleton in elderly men or women with involutional or post-menopausal osteoporosis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, CINAHL, HealthPLAN, Dissertation Abstracts, Index to UK Theses, Current Contents, and bibliographies of identified trials and reviews. Trials were also obtained from the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group trials register. Date of the most recent search: December 1995. SELECTION CRITERIA: Any randomised or quasi-randomised trial which compared Vitamin D or a Vitamin D analogue, either alone or in combination with calcium supplementation, with a placebo, no intervention, or the administration of calcium supplements, with fracture as an outcome, in elderly men or women with involutional or post-menopausal osteoporosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality, by use of a seven item scale, and extracted data. Additional information was sought from trialists. Where possible the data were pooled. MAIN RESULTS: Fourteen trials recording 13 different comparisons were included. In the only trial of Vitamin D alone, protection against hip fracture was not confirmed. Two regimens, each represented by one large trial, which showed limited evidence of efficacy in reducing the incidence of hip or other appendicular skeleton fractures were: 1) Oral Vitamin D when accompanied by calcium supplementation. 2) 1,25 dihydroxy Vitamin D (calcitriol). This appeared more effective than calcium in a direct comparison. Regimens showing limited evidence of efficacy in reducing the incidence of vertebral deformity were: 1) 1,25 dihydroxy Vitamin D (calcitriol), which appeared more effective than calcium in one large trial, and more effective than placebo from pooled results of two small trials. 2) Oral 1-alpha hydroxy Vitamin D (alfacalcidol), when administered with calcium supplements (two small trials, which lacked power to confirm a possible effect). Hypercalcaemia and gastro-intestinal symptoms, reported in less than 5% of participants, were slightly more common when Vitamin D analogues were taken. However, the risk of death was marginally less. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Uncertainty remains about the efficacy of regimens which include Vitamin D or its analogues in fracture prevention. Particularly if co-supplementation of calcium is required, significant cost differences are likely to exist between regimens. Further randomised trials with economic evaluation are desirable before community fracture prevention programmes employing Vitamin D supplementation can be confidently introduced.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery for proximal femoral and other closed long bone fractures.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic prophylaxis has been established policy for major surgical operations for many years. In fracture fixation, the effectiveness, and the duration of administration, have been a matter of debate. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of the prophylactic administration of antibiotics in patients undergoing surgical management of hip or other long bone fractures. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents, Dissertation Abstracts, and Index to UK Theses, and bibliographies of identified articles. Trials were also obtained from the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group trials register. Date of the most recent search: end of 1997. SELECTION CRITERIA PARTICIPANTS: Any patients with a hip or other closed long bone fracture undergoing surgery for internal fixation or replacement arthroplasty. INTERVENTIONS: Any regimen of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis administered at the time of surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: Wound infection (deep and superficial), urinary tract infection, respiratory tract infection, adverse effects of prophylaxis, economic evaluations. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion, and assessed methodological quality and extracted data. Where possible, data were pooled and Peto odds ratios and absolute risk reductions, each with 95% confidence intervals, calculated. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty one randomised trials of only poor or moderate quality were included. The comparisons tested fell within six comparison groups, principally multiple dose or a single dose of antibiotic versus a placebo or no treatment. Antibiotic prophylaxis reduces wound, urinary and respiratory tract infections in patients undergoing surgery for closed fracture fixation. Economic modelling has indicated that this is a cost-effective intervention. There are limited data for the incidence of adverse effects, but as expected they appear to be more common in those receiving antibiotics. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic prophylaxis should be offered to those undergoing surgery for closed fracture fixation. On ethical grounds, further placebo controlled randomised trials of the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in closed fracture surgery are unlikely to be justified. Trials addressing the cost-effectiveness of different effective antibiotic regimens would need to be very large and may not be feasible.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗
PubMed2000

Heparin, low molecular weight heparin and physical methods for preventing deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism following surgery for hip fractures.

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture patients have a high risk of thromboembolic complications following surgical management. OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of heparin (unfractionated (U), and low molecular weight (LMW) heparins), and physical methods (compression stockings, calf or foot pumps) for prevention of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism after surgery for hip fracture in the elderly. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group trials register, Medline, Embase, and reference lists of published papers and books. We contacted trialists and other workers in the field. Date of most recent search: September 1996. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials evaluating the use of heparins and physical agents for prevention of DVT and pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data. Trials were grouped into four categories (heparin versus control, mechanical versus control, LMW heparin versus U heparin, and miscellaneous) and results pooled where possible. MAIN RESULTS: The 26 included trials involved 2600 predominantly female and elderly patients. Overall, trial quality was disappointing. Ten trials involving 826 patients which compared U heparin with control, and four trials of 471 patients which compared LMW heparin with control, showed a reduction in the incidence of lower limb DVT (121/511 (24%) versus 203/519 (39%); Peto odds ratio 0.41; 95% confidence interval 0.31 to 0.55). There were insufficient data to confirm the efficacy of either agent in the prevention of pulmonary embolism. There was a non significant increase in overall mortality in the heparin group (46/420 (11%) versus 35/423 (8%); Peto odds ratio 1.39; 95% confidence interval 0. 86 to 2.23). Data were inadequate for all other outcomes including wound complications. There is insufficient evidence from five trials, involving 644 patients, to establish if LMW heparin was superior to U heparin. Most trials evaluating heparins had methodological defects. Four trials, involving 442 patients, testing mechanical pumping devices were also methodologically flawed, and so pooled results need to be viewed cautiously. Mechanical pumping devices may protect against DVT (12/202 (6%) versus 42/212 (19%); Peto odds ratio 0.24; 95% confidence interval 0.13 to 0.44). Although the limited data indicated a potential benefit, they were inadequate to establish any effect on the incidence of pulmonary embolism and overall mortality. Problems with skin abrasion and compliance were reported. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: U and LMW heparins protect against lower limb DVT. There is insufficient evidence to confirm either protection against pulmonary embolism or overall benefit, or to distinguish between various applications of heparin. Foot and calf pumping devices appear to prevent DVT, may protect against pulmonary embolism, and reduce mortality, but compliance remains a problem. Good quality trials of mechanical methods as well as direct comparisons with heparin should be considered.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2000

Condylocephalic nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.

BACKGROUND: Condylocephalic nails are intramedullary nails which are inserted up through the femoral canal from above the knee, for example Ender and Harris nails. OBJECTIVES: To compare condylocephalic nails with alternative implants (extramedullary implants such as fixed nail plates and sliding hip screws, or other intramedullary nails) for the treatment of extracapsular hip fracture in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group trials register, Medline (1983 to August 1999) and reference lists of relevant articles. Date of the most recent search: August 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised trials comparing condylocephalic nails with other implants. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Data were pooled where relevant and possible. Ender nails and Harris nail data were presented separately. Results from fixed nail plates and sliding hip screws were sub-grouped to explore differences in these two implant types. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven trials were included. Ten compared Ender nails with either a fixed nail plate or a sliding hip screw. One compared the Harris condylocephalic nail with a sliding hip screw. The only advantages of condylocephalic nails were a reduced deep wound sepsis rate (0.9% versus 4.2%; odds ratio 0.26, 95% confidence interval 0.12 to 0.56), length of surgery and operative blood loss. However there was an increased risk of re-operation (20.9% versus 5. 5%; odds ratio 3.78, 95% confidence interval 2.67 to 5.36) and later fracture of the femur when compared with extramedullary implants. There was also an increased risk of cut-out of the implant from the femoral head for Ender nails compared with the sliding hip screw, but not for fixed nail plates. Backing out of the nail was a frequent complication (30%) of Ender nails and often resulted in revision surgery. Ender nails also had an increased risk of shortening of the leg and external rotation deformity and potentially a poorer return to previous walking ability. An increase in residual pain resulting from an excess of knee pain was also evident in patients undergoing condylocephalic nailing. There was no apparent difference in mortality between the condylocephalic nail and extramedullary implant groups. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Any advantages in intra-operative outcomes of condylocephalic nails are outweighed by the increase in fracture healing complications, re-operation rate, residual pain and limb deformity when compared with an extramedullary implant, particularly a sliding hip screw. The use of condylocephalic nails (in particular Ender nails), for trochanteric fracture is no longer appropriate.

Bone Nails↗
PubMed2000

Interventions for preventing falls in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Fractures in the elderly often result from a simple fall. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of programmes designed to reduce the incidence of falls in community dwelling, institutionalised, or hospitalised elderly people. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycLIT, Social Science Citation Index, Dissertation Abstracts, Index to UK Theses, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and bibliographies of identified studies. We contacted known workers in the field. Trials were also obtained from the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group trials register. Date of the most recent search: May 1997. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of interventions designed to minimise the effect of, or prevent exposure to, any putative risk factor for falling in elderly individuals living in the community, in institutional care, or in hospital. The main outcomes of interest were number of fallers or falls, or the number sustaining a fall resulting in injury. Trials that focused on intermediate outcomes such as improved balance or did not report fall outcomes, were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers selected trials for inclusion. For each included trial, quality assessment and data extraction was carried out independently by two reviewers. Results of trials of similar design were pooled. MAIN RESULTS: Eighteen trials and one pre-planned meta-analysis were included. The analysis of four trials which studied the effect of exercise alone did not establish protection against falling (Peto odds ratio 1.05; 95% confidence interval 0.74 to 1.48). Based on one trial, there was no evidence to support exercise in conjunction with health education classes (Peto odds ratio 1.72; 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 3.75), or of health education classes alone (Peto odds ratio 1.25; 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 3.03) for the prevention of falls. However, significant protection against falling was apparent from interventions which targeted multiple, identified, risk factors in individual patients (Peto odds ratio 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0. 64 to 0.91), and from interventions which focused on behavioural interventions targeting environmental hazards plus other risk factors (Peto odds ratio 0.81; 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 0.93). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Health care purchasers and providers contemplating fall prevention programmes should consider health screening of at risk elderly people, followed by interventions which are targeted at both intrinsic and environmental risk factors of individual patients. There is inadequate evidence for the effectiveness of single interventions such as exercise alone or health education classes for the prevention of falls.

Accidental Falls↗
PubMed2000

Interventions for preventing and treating stress fractures and stress reactions of bone of the lower limbs in young adults.

BACKGROUND: Stress reaction in bone, which may proceed to a fracture, is a significant problem in military recruits and in athletes, particularly long distance runners. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the evidence from controlled trials of treatments and programmes for prevention or management of lower limb stress fractures and stress reactions of bone in active young adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group Trials Register, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents, Dissertation Abstracts, Index to UK Theses and the bibliographies of identified articles. Date of last search: December 1997 SELECTION CRITERIA: Any randomised or quasi-randomised trial evaluating a programme or treatment to prevent or treat lower limb stress reactions of bone or stress fractures in active young adults. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Searching, a decision on inclusion or exclusion, methodological assessment, and data extraction were carried out according to a predetermined protocol included in the body of the review. Analysis using Review Manager software allowed pooling of data and calculation of Peto odds ratios and absolute risk reductions, each with 95% confidence intervals. MAIN RESULTS: The use of "shock absorbing" insoles, evaluated in four trials, appears to reduce the incidence of stress fractures and stress reactions of bone (Peto odds ratio 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0. 30 to 0.76). Incomplete data from one trial indicated that reduction of running and jumping intensity may also be effective. The use of pneumatic braces in the rehabilitation of tibial stress fractures significantly reduces the time to recommencing training (weighted mean difference -42.6 days, 95% confidence interval -55.8 to -29.4 days). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The use of shock absorbing insoles in footwear reduces the incidence of stress fractures in athletes and military personnel. Rehabilitation after tibial stress fracture is aided by the use of pneumatic bracing.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture in the elderly is usually the result of a simple fall and hip protectors have been advocated as a means to reduce impact and consequences of such falls. OBJECTIVES: To determine if external hip protectors reduce the incidence of hip fractures in elderly persons following a fall. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group trials register, MEDLINE, and reference lists of relevant articles were searched, and identified trialists contacted. Date of the most recent search: August 1998. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing the use of hip protectors with a control group. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality, using a ten item scale, and extracted data. Additional information was sought from all trialists. Wherever appropriate and possible, the data are presented graphically. MAIN RESULTS: Five randomised trials involving 1681 participants were included within the review. All studies involved elderly people in nursing homes or residential care, three within the Scandinavian countries, one in Japan and one in the United Kingdom. The two largest studies involving 1409 participants randomised by nursing home or nursing home ward rather than by the individual (cluster randomisation). One study of 141 individuals was primarily a compliance study. Summation of results from four of these studies gave an occurrence of hip fractures of 13/620 (2.1%) for those allocated to wear hip protectors, against 57/920 (6.2%) to those not allocated to wear protectors. However due to the large number of participants allocated by cluster randomisation it was not possible to demonstrate conclusively that this difference between groups was statistically significant. Only one of the 13 hip fractures that occurred in the individuals allocated to wear hip protectors occurred whilst the protector was worn. No significant adverse effects of the hip protectors were reported but compliance, particularly in the long term, was poor. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Hip protectors appear to reduce the risk of hip fracture within a selected population at high risk of sustaining a hip fracture. However, this conclusion is based on four trials of low to moderate quality. As two used cluster randomisation, pooling of data was not possible. The generalisability of the results is unknown beyond high-risk populations. Results from six ongoing trials may clarify this situation. Acceptability by users of the protectors remains a problem, due to discomfort and practicality.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Are clinical and patient assessed outcomes affected by reducing length of hospital stay for total hip arthroplasty?

This prospective observational study investigated the relationship between the length of hospital stay (LOS) and outcomes at 3 months for primary total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Mean length of postoperative stay was 9.5 +/- 2.8 days. Predictors of LOS were patient's age, sex, and number of comorbidities; preoperative Charnley scores and Nottingham Health Profile measures; complications; and hospital in which surgery took place. LOS was found to have a small negative correlation with outcome. The dominant association with improved outcome was the severity of the patients' impairment preoperatively. These data suggest that in situations in which adequate rehabilitation and support are available after discharge, a marginal reduction in postoperative LOS--from the average of 10.3 days observed at 1 hospital to the average of 8 days observed at another--would not adversely affect the short-term outcome.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Accidents in older people living at home: a community-based study assessing prevalence, type, location and injuries.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence, type, location of and injuries from home accidents, including falls and other accidents, and to explore whether variables including socio-demographic characteristics, medication use and home hazards were associated with all home accidents and falls. METHOD: 657 older people were interviewed about accidents in the previous four weeks. For a subsample (n = 425), a home hazard check was completed. RESULTS: Of the 101 accidents reported, 51% (n = 51) were falls and 50% (n = 50) were other accidents. The most common location for all accidents was outside (30%). Most resulted in minor injury to the legs (43%) or arms (39%). Medical treatment was sought for 14% of accidents. Having more than five hazards and infrequent home visits by healthcare providers were associated with having at least one accident and at least one fall. Use of a walking aid was also associated with falling. CONCLUSION: Rates of falls and other accidents are considerable. IMPLICATIONS: Work is required to confirm the importance of the relationships suggested and to provide data on the burden of injury associated with non-fall accidents.

Accidental Falls↗
PubMed1999

Autonomic neuropeptides in the interface membrane of aseptic loose hip prostheses.

We analyzed the presence of autonomic nerve fibers in the interface membranes (n = 9) surrounding aseptic loosened hip prostheses by immunohistochemistry. The study focused on the autonomic messengers neuropeptide Y (NPY), tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), the rate-limiting enzyme in the synthesis of noradrenaline (NA), and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP). Protein gene product (PGP) 9.5, a general marker of peripheral nerve fibers, was also analyzed to establish the neuronal character of the immunoreactive structures. PGP 9.5-positive and NPY-positive nerve fibers were identified in all 9 samples, and VIP-immunoreactive and TH-immunoreactive fibers were found in 7. There was a difference in the distribution of nerve fibers both between and within the samples. Among the neuropeptides analyzed, NPY was most abundant. NPY-positive and TH-positive fibers were predominantly found around the blood vessel walls forming varicose nerve terminals. VIP-positive fibers were mainly observed as thin varicose nerve terminals with no relationship to blood vessels. Autonomic neuropeptides exert not only vasoactive and immunoregulatory effects, but also have been found to have direct effects on bone tissue. Moreover, the autonomic nervous system has been strongly implicated in nociception and inflammation. Neuronal NPY, TH, and VIP in the interface membrane may prove to contribute to the pathologic mechanisms leading to aseptic loosening of hip prostheses.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Mechanical considerations in impaction bone grafting.

In impaction grafting of contained bone defects after revision joint arthroplasty the graft behaves as a friable aggregate and its resistance to complex forces depends on grading, normal load and compaction. Bone mills in current use produce a distribution of particle sizes more uniform than is desirable for maximising resistance to shear stresses. We have performed experiments in vitro using morsellised allograft bone from the femoral head which have shown that its mechanical properties improve with increasing normal load and with increasing shear strains (strain hardening). The mechanical strength also increases with increasing compaction energy, and with the addition of bioglass particles to make good the deficiency in small and very small fragments. Donor femoral heads may be milled while frozen without affecting the profile of the particle size. Osteoporotic femoral heads provide a similar grading of sizes, although fewer particles are obtained from each specimen. Our findings have implications for current practice and for the future development of materials and techniques.

Bone Density↗