PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10073620

Developing a clinical competency examination in radiology: part I--test structure.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a need for radiology educational outcome measures that evaluate clinical competency. This is the first of two articles introducing a clinical competency examination in radiology. This first article describes the evolution and structure of the examination. The second article presents the results of two administrations of the examination and evaluates possible outcome predictors. OBJECTIVE: To develop a measure of clinical competency in radiology. DESIGN: Descriptive. METHODS: A test was developed to simulate the radiologic interpretive skills needed in clinical chiropractic practice. Students were timed as they responded to questions regarding the localization, categorization, management, and identification of pathologic conditions presented on plain film images of the spine and chest. Twenty-five radiographic cases were displayed at individual viewbox stations, and student responses to the 4 questions were compared with the consensus responses of 2 radiology instructors. RESULTS: Two versions of the test, using different cases, were given to the same ninth trimester class of 210 chiropractic students in a 10-trimester program. Of the 210 students, 116 (55.2%; 86 men and 30 women) took version 1 of the examination, and 1 month later 181 (86.2%: 138 men and 43 women) took version 2 of the examination. Student comments after each examination were favorable. CONCLUSION: The test structure uniquely provides information related to the student's ability to localize, categorize, manage, and identify pathologic conditions on imaging studies. At present the examination is instructor time intensive; further refinement is needed before wide implementation can occur.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D M Marchiori, T L Adams, C N Henderson. 1999. Developing a clinical competency examination in radiology: part I--test structure.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-4754(99)70109-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

An examination of musculoskeletal cognitive competency in chiropractic interns.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the cognitive competency of final-year chiropractic students in musculoskeletal medicine. METHODS: The face, content, and criterion validity of the Basic Clinical Examination (BCE) for musculoskeletal medicine were tested for use in chiropractic education. After validity testing, the BCE was administered in a cross-sectional design to all fourth year students (154) attending the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College. RESULTS: Twenty percent (5 questions) of the BCE was deemed not relevant or outside of the scope of practice by criterion experts. One hundred twenty-three (80%) fourth year chiropractic interns participated in the cross-sectional study. Interns achieved a 51.2% passing rate (mean score, 73.2%; 95% confidence interval, 82%-71.8%) for the 25-item BCE, whereas the criterion experts achieved a 100% passing rate. For the modified 20-item BCE, the interns' mean score was 80.8%, whereas the criterion experts' mean score rose to 92.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Most final-year chiropractic interns at this college were [corrected] found to be competent in musculoskeletal medicine as assessed by the Basic Competency Examination. This is in contradiction to previous work with medical students, recent medical graduates, nonorthopedic staff physicians, osteopathic students, and physical therapy students. Chiropractic clinicians with postgraduate training showed considerably better results than chiropractic interns. Problems pertaining to the content validity (relevance and scope of practice for chiropractors) of the BCE need to be addressed.

Chiropractic↗