PubMed · 17222917
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Edzard Ernst. 2007-01-12. 'First, do no harm' with complementary and alternative medicine.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2006.12.008
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the cognitive competency of final-year chiropractic students in musculoskeletal medicine. METHODS: The face, content, and criterion validity of the Basic Clinical Examination (BCE) for musculoskeletal medicine were tested for use in chiropractic education. After validity testing, the BCE was administered in a cross-sectional design to all fourth year students (154) attending the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College. RESULTS: Twenty percent (5 questions) of the BCE was deemed not relevant or outside of the scope of practice by criterion experts. One hundred twenty-three (80%) fourth year chiropractic interns participated in the cross-sectional study. Interns achieved a 51.2% passing rate (mean score, 73.2%; 95% confidence interval, 82%-71.8%) for the 25-item BCE, whereas the criterion experts achieved a 100% passing rate. For the modified 20-item BCE, the interns' mean score was 80.8%, whereas the criterion experts' mean score rose to 92.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Most final-year chiropractic interns at this college were [corrected] found to be competent in musculoskeletal medicine as assessed by the Basic Competency Examination. This is in contradiction to previous work with medical students, recent medical graduates, nonorthopedic staff physicians, osteopathic students, and physical therapy students. Chiropractic clinicians with postgraduate training showed considerably better results than chiropractic interns. Problems pertaining to the content validity (relevance and scope of practice for chiropractors) of the BCE need to be addressed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The chiropractic profession is currently facing a shift in practice and health care environments. This editorial reflects on the current state of the profession and suggests that the profession should move from the thinking and practice styles of the past that primarily attempted to prove patient care and practice to a more productive approach that strives to improve patient care and practice. The following primary areas that require attention are discussed: (1) evidence-based and best practices-oriented research priorities; (2) constructive engagement of the greater health care system; and (3) successful ethical business models.