PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10101675

The connection between rhythmicity and brain function.

Abstract

Although rhythm and music are not entirely synonymous terms, rhythm constitutes one of the most essential structural and organizational elements of music. When considering the effect of music on human adaptation, the profound effect of rhythm on the motor system strongly suggests that the time structure of music is the essential element relating music specifically to motor behavior. Why the motor system appears so sensitive to auditory priming and timing stimulation can only be partially answered so far. The high-performance function of the auditory system regarding processing of time information makes good functional sense within the constraints of auditory sensory processing. Thus, the motor system sensitivity to auditory entrainment may simply be an evolutionary useful function of taking advantage of the specific and unique aspects of auditory information processing for enhanced control and organization of motor behavior; e.g, in the time domain. Unlike processes in the motor system, many other physiological processes cannot be effectively entrained by external sensory stimuli. For example, there is probably a very good protective reason why other cyclical physiological processes (e.g., autonomic processes such as heart rate) have only very limited entrainment capacity to external rhythmic cues. Some of the basic auditory-motor arousal connections may also have their basis in adaptive evolutionary processes related to survival behavior; e.g., in fight or flight reactions. Much of the "why" in auditory-motor interactions, however, remains unknown heuristically. In the absence of this knowledge, great care should be taken to not compensate for this lack of understanding of specific cause and effect processes by assigning anthropomorphic descriptions to the behavior of biological and physical systems. The unraveling of the perceptual, physiological, and neuroanatomical basis of the interaction between rhythm and movement has been, and continues to be, a fascinating endeavor with important ramifications for the study of brain function, sensory perception, and motor behavior. One of the most exciting findings in this research, however, may be the evidence that the interaction between auditory rhythm and physical response can be effectively harnessed for specific therapeutic purposes in the rehabilitation of persons with movement disorders.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M H Thaut, G P Kenyon, M L Schauer, G C McIntosh. The connection between rhythmicity and brain function.. https://doi.org/10.1109/51.752991

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Acoustic trauma induces reemergence of the growth- and plasticity-associated protein GAP-43 in the rat auditory brainstem.

We explored the consequences of unilateral acoustic trauma to intracochlear and central nervous system structures in rats. An acoustic trauma, induced by applying click stimuli of 130 dB (sound pressure level; SPL) for 30 minutes, resulted in an instant and permanent threshold shift of 95.92 +/- 1.08 dB (SEM) in the affected ear. We observed, as a consequence, a structural deterioration of the organ of Corti. Deprivation-dependent changes of neurons of the auditory brainstem were determined using antibodies against neurofilament and the growth-associated protein GAP-43 and compared with those following cochleotomy, studied earlier. By 231 days posttrauma, spiral ganglion cell bodies and their processes were almost entirely lost from all cochlear regions with destroyed organ of Corti. In the lateral superior olive (LSO) ipsilateral to the trauma, cell bodies of lateral olivocochlear neurons turned transiently GAP-43 positive within the first 1.5 years posttrauma. The time course of emergence and disappearance of this population of neurons was similar to that found after cochleotomy. Additionally, after noise trauma, principal cells in contralateral LSO and in medial superior olive (MSO) on both sides of the brainstem developed an expression of GAP-43 that began 3 and 16 days posttrauma, respectively, and lasted for at least 1 year. Such cells were rarely observed after cochleotomy. An unequivocal rise in GAP-43 immunoreactivity was also found in the neuropil of the inferior colliculus and the ventral cochlear nucleus, both preferentially on the acoustically damaged side. We conclude that the degree and specific cause of sudden unilateral deafness entail specific patterns of plasticity responses in the auditory brainstem, possibly to prevent the neural network dedicated to locate sounds in the environment from delivering erroneous signals centralward.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Spatiotemporal pattern of neural processing in the human auditory cortex.

The principles that the auditory cortex uses to decipher a stream of acoustic information have remained elusive. Neural responses in the animal auditory cortex can be broadly classified into transient and sustained activity. We examined the existence of similar principles in the human brain. Sound-evoked, blood oxygen level-dependent signal response was decomposed temporally into independent transient and sustained constituents, which predominated in different portions-core and belt-of the auditory cortex. Converging with unit recordings, our data suggest that this spatiotemporal pattern in the auditory cortex may represent a fundamental principle of analyzing sound information.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

High-throughput behavioral screening method for detecting auditory response defects in zebrafish.

We have developed an automated, high-throughput behavioral screening method for detecting hearing defects in zebrafish. Our assay monitors a rapid escape reflex in response to a loud sound. With this approach, 36 adult zebrafish, restrained in visually isolated compartments, can be simultaneously assessed for responsiveness to near-field 400 Hz sinusoidal tone bursts. Automated, objective determinations of responses are achieved with a computer program that obtains images at precise times relative to the acoustic stimulus. Images taken with a CCD video camera before and after stimulus presentation are subtracted to reveal a response to the sound. Up to 108 fish can be screened per hour. Over 6500 fish were tested to validate the reliability of the assay. We found that 1% of these animals displayed hearing deficits. The phenotypes of non-responders were further assessed with radiological analysis for defects in the gross morphology of the auditory system. Nearly all of those showed abnormalities in conductive elements of the auditory system: the swim bladder or Weberian ossicles.

Acoustic Stimulation↗