PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10107720

Solomon--the ultimate moral expert?

Abstract

When faced with difficult moral decisions, many people would prefer to shift the burden of moral responsibility to a moral expert. I imagine what appears to be the perfect moral expert: a computer program called SOLOMON designed to fit in a computer on one's wrist. After noting some advantages of using SOLOMON, I claim that moral agents would find individualizing the program as difficult as making moral decisions in the past. A revised version of the ultimate moral expert is also considered: one hires the wisest, kindest person on earth--Solomé--to accompany one as a moral guide. However, turning over our moral problems to an expert, even to the noble Solomé, still falls short. For the process of coming to moral decisions is itself import. One's values and personality may change as a result of moral deliberation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

V L Warren. 1990. Solomon--the ultimate moral expert?. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00113952

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

CDM and JI in SWM.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Ethics, Institutional↗

Issues on research integrity: a perspective.

This paper discusses several key issues that are relevant to the integrity and success of the biomedical research enterprise. Attention to these issues will improve research outcomes and reduce negative consequences in research. Subjects addressed include normative practices in research; the importance of quality data; mentoring of young scientists; how to proceed when a member of the scientific community discovers misconduct or other breaches of integrity; and the level of harm to public confidence in research due to misconduct and lack of transparency in research findings.

Ethics, Institutional↗

Operating department support level 2 NVQ: Some perceptions.

New roles for support staff are emerging and registered practitioners are now being asked to devolve key aspects of patient care. This study explores some of the background issues relating to these developments and provides evidence regarding the inevitability but also benefits, if managed well, of these changes. The experience of both support staff who have undertaken the Operating Department Support National Vocational Qualification Level 2 (ODS NVQ) and their managers was examined using a phenomenological approach. Data was obtained on the perceived value of this qualification and training and how it affected the working lives and career development of support staff.

Ethics, Institutional↗