PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10128700

Hospital pharmacy staff development programs in Ohio.

Abstract

Although staff development programs have been used to implement clinical services in Ohio hospital pharmacies, the majority of clinical services have been implemented without the use of staff development programs. The results of this study show that less than half of Ohio hospital pharmacy departments provide staff development programs. In those hospitals where the programs were provided, the average number of clinical services implemented through staff development was not significantly different from the average number implemented without these programs. Nor was there a significant difference in the average number of clinical services implemented through staff development between small hospitals (199 beds or less), medium hospitals (200 to 399 beds), and larger hospitals (400 or more beds); between government (city, county, or state) and private, nonprofit hospitals; and between hospitals whose staff development program coordinators were directors and hospitals whose coordinators were not directors. For the majority of departments that provided staff development programs, certification or testing of pharmacists was not required before providing clinical services. Results from the survey indicated that certification may not be necessary for all clinical services. Commitment to staff development programs in terms of management support and participation, awarding of continuing-education credit, and use in pharmacist performance evaluations was demonstrated by no more than 34 percent of all departments that responded. Financial commitment to these programs was low. Overall, since less than half of the departments reported providing staff development programs, the level of commitment to staff development appeared to be low.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D J Waller, S R Smith, M G Holiday, B T Lively, K K Shah. 1992. Hospital pharmacy staff development programs in Ohio.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10128700/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Peer-mentoring workshop for continuous professional development.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a Professional Skills Enhancement Workshop (PSEW) to assist practitioners who require skills training to maintain competency and meet new standards of practice. Participants for this workshop were identified as those pharmacists who completed the peer review assessment process and who did not meet standards of practice expectations. DESIGN: The full-day workshop consists of a half-day introduction to use of clinical drug information resources and approaches to addressing practice-based questions. The second part of the workshop introduces participants to the use of structured patient-interviewing techniques to elicit information using standardized patients. Participants in the workshop completed self-assessments as well as course evaluations. Subsequent to completion of the course, participants rechallenged the peer review assessment process, a test of their clinical skills consisting of a written test of clinical knowledge and an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), to provide objective evidence of skills acquisition. ASSESSMENT: Over 90% of participants "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that the PSEW was helpful in reacquainting them with current standards of professional practice. Sixty-nine percent of participants who completed the peer review assessment rechallenge process following completion of the course were able to meet standards of practice expectations. CONCLUSIONS: In developing continuous professional development programs, first identifying the needs of all practitioners is essential. The PSEW provides one model for skills training for practitioners who, for a variety of reasons, may not have maintained the expected level of competency.

Education, Pharmacy, Continuing↗