PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 10141817

Competency-Based Certification Project. Phase III: content validity, standard setting and criterion-related validity.

Abstract

This is the final article in a three-part series explaining the CAMRT's Competency-Based Certification Project--an effort to make the Association's certification process more job-relevant. The first article (Journal, August 1994) explained the job analysis process used to specify and validate the list of duties and tasks required of entry-level medical radiation technologists, the imaging and treatment procedures they perform, and the equipment they use. The second article (Journal, October 1994) explained the process for developing an examination blueprint by reviewing the CAMRT's examinations and summaries of clinical experience in the context of competency-based evaluation and the job analysis validation in each discipline. This article examines the development of assessment standards for certification examinations and summaries of clinical experience. It provides an overview of the steps necessary to develop a valid and defensible licensure/certification process after development of the examination content is complete.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M E Gessaroli, M Poliquin. 1995. Competency-Based Certification Project. Phase III: content validity, standard setting and criterion-related validity.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10141817/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Investing in Canada's nursing workforce: a comprehensive review to inform policy innovations and directions.

BACKGROUND: Health systems worldwide face persistent health workers challenges including nursing shortages, workforce strain, and inequities. In Canada, these challenges have prompted renewed national and provincial reforms to strengthen recruitment, retention, leadership, and sustainability. This paper compares nursing workforce policy directions across Canada, and international jurisdictions to inform policy and planning. METHODS: A cross-country comparative analysis of policies building on a comprehensive national funded review that included an umbrella review of 69 systematic reviews, a comparative policy review of nursing workforce strategies in five jurisdictions, and validation through national horizon-scanning and policy dialogues (n >100). Evidence was analyzed across system, organizational, and individual levels. RESULTS: At the system level, international jurisdictions demonstrate comprehensive, legislated approaches integrating data, governance, and multi-year funding have advanced key nursing strategies. In Canada, the advances show the importance of strategies to have national and provincial/territorial alignment emphasizing leadership, flexibility, and inclusion as key levers. Organizational and individual-level reforms such as mentorship, leadership development, and wellness initiatives are expanding but remain variably evaluated. Experts identified national workforce data strategies and policy integration with embedded evaluation as key enablers to inform scalability and sustainability of implemented strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Canada's nursing workforce reforms are advancing toward coordinated, equity-driven, and evidence-informed strategies. Continued investment in evaluation, leadership, and national integrated data systems along with integrating nursing workforce planning within broader intersectoral planning will consolidate these gains and position Canada as an international leader in sustainable nursing workforce policy.

Canada