PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10145672

Monitoring during resuscitation.

Abstract

Use of many different types of monitors during resuscitation has been described in the literature. These monitors differ in their usefulness, technical feasibility, initial costs, and long-term costs (Table 4). There have been many published reports of CPR success rates in the hospital and in the pre-hospital setting. In spite of considerable advances in technology over the past 30 years, survival from CPR has changed little over that time. Although numerous types of monitoring during resuscitation are possible, and sometimes useful, the impact of expensive technology on ultimate outcome (survival) must be critically evaluated.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Hess, D Eitel. 1992. Monitoring during resuscitation.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10145672/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of ventilation and chest compression performance by bystanders using the Impact Model 730 ventilator and a conventional bag valve with mask in a model of adult cardiopulmonary arrest.

"Bystanders" or lay persons are typically the first caregivers to attend to a victim of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Astronaut crew medical officers (CMO) play a similar role to bystanders aboard the International Space Station (ISS). Studies have demonstrated the importance of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) for patient survival before the arrival of emergency medical care. Recent apprehension from bystanders about the threat of contracting communicable diseases during BCPR, however, has led to the consideration of other ventilation systems such as the bag-valve mask (BVM) and automatic transport ventilators (ATV). BVM use is called for during CPR aboard the ISS. This study evaluated the ventilation and compression performance of 40 basic CPR-trained bystanders using either a BVM (adult-sized self-inflating bag with face mask) or an ATV (Model 730 ventilator (M730), Impact Instrumentation, Inc., West Caldwell, NJ). Each two-bystander team gave BCPR to a simulated cardiopulmonary arrest victim using the 2-breath/15-compression cycle for 4 min and then switched roles for another 4-min interval. Compared to BVM use, the M730 led to significantly (p<0.05) lower number of breaths, smaller tidal volumes, airway flows, airway pressures, volume of gas entering the stomach per breath and chest compressions for the 4-min period. The M730 also enabled a bystander to meet the recommendation of 4-breath and compression cycles per minute as per Guidelines 2000. Lastly, ease-of-use scores were significantly higher for the M730 compared to the BVM. Overall, the data suggest that the M730 improves the quality of performance for a bystander performing BCPR.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation↗