PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10148456

Modern developments in clinical perimetry.

C A Johnson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Recent developments in automated perimetry have emphasized the adaptation of specialized psychophysical procedures for visual field testing to measure visual properties other than the detection of light. In addition, many new methods to quantitatively analyze visual field data have been generated. These new developments are promising for enhancing the diagnostic capabilities of automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma and patients suspected of having glaucoma. A review of some of the most recent advances in automated perimetry are presented.

Explore related subjects

GlaucomaHumansPattern Recognition, VisualVisual Field TestsVisual FieldsJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C A Johnson. 1993. Modern developments in clinical perimetry.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10148456/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Do scleral flap dimensions influence reliability of intraocular pressure control in experimental trabeculectomy?

AIM: To compare the effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) of large vs small scleral flap size during trabeculectomy using adjustable sutures. METHODS: Trabeculectomy operations were performed on nine donor human eyes connected to a constant flow infusion with real-time IOP monitoring. Large scleral flaps (4 x 4 mm, 16 mm(2), n=12) or small scleral flaps (3 x 2 mm, 6 mm(2), n=9) were constructed over 0.76 mm(2) sclerostomies. For each procedure, equilibrium IOP was measured following tight closure with two four-throw adjustable 10-0 nylon sutures. RESULTS: Five scleral flaps were thin or poorly constructed; four of these were in the initial seven procedures, implying learning effect. These had a mean absolute IOP of 7.6 mmHg (range 2.7-12.4 mmHg) and mean relative IOP of 28.3% of baseline (range 10-45.8%) after closure. In the remaining 16 good quality procedures, mean IOP was 1.3 mmHg (range 0-3.4 mmHg) after sclerostomy, confirming minimal outflow resistance before closure. Following flap closure mean IOP was 20 mmHg (SD 4.4, range 15.5-29.3 mmHg) for large (n=8), and 18.7 mmHg (SD 3.6, 15.9-25.8 mmHg) for small (n=8) flaps (unpaired t-test, P=0.26). Mean IOP (% baseline) was 71.6% (SD 8.4, range 60.6-86.6%) and 66% (SD=12.7, 46.8-86.6%) for large and small flap groups, respectively (unpaired t-test, P=0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Well-constructed scleral flaps of both sizes were able to support an average IOP at least two-thirds of baseline, and both had similar absolute IOP levels. Errors in flap construction resulted in loss of IOP control. Smaller flap size does not appear to compromise control of early postoperative IOP using adjustable sutures.

Glaucoma↗