PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10166241

Computerized medication administration records decrease medication occurrences.

Abstract

Studies have demonstrated that medication errors occur at a number of locations in the continuum between ordering of drug therapy and administration of the medication. Computer management of patient medication profiles offers the opportunity to enhance communication between pharmacists and nurses, and to decrease medication errors and delays in delivery of therapy. A number of authors have postulated that computerization of medication profiles would enhance medication delivery accuracy and timeliness, but no study has demonstrated this improvement. We report the results of a retrospective analysis undertaken to assess the improvements resulting from sharing a computerized medication record. We used a broader definition of medication occurrences that includes the more traditional definition, and averted errors, delays in delivery of medications and information, and disagreements between pharmacy and nursing medication profiles. We compared medication occurrences reported through an existing internal system between two periods; the first when separate pharmacy and nursing medication records were used, and the second period when a shared medication record was used by pharmacy and nursing. Average medication occurrences per admission decreased from 0.1084 to 0.0658 (p < 0.01). Medication occurrences per dose decreased from 0.0005 to 0.0003 (p < 0.01). The use of a shared medication record by pharmacy and nursing led to a statistically significant decrease in medication occurrences. Information shared between the two professions allowed timely resolution of discrepancies in medication orders, leading to better execution of drug therapy, decreased medication occurrences, and increased efficiency.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A L Wilson, J J Hill, R G Wilson, K Nipper, I W Kwon. 1997. Computerized medication administration records decrease medication occurrences.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10166241/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Physicians' assessment of computerized prescribing].

Prescription errors are a major source of preventable adverse drug events. Computerized prescribing (CP) which screens physicians' order for mistakes, drug-allergy, drug-disease, drug-laboratory and drug-drug interactions can prevent many of these errors and improve quality of care. However, computerized systems are often time-consuming, difficult to handle, and may create their own mistakes. Following the introduction of CP on an internal medicine ward, we administered a questionnaire to evaluate physicians' opinions about the new system. The survey assessed computer literacy, ease of using CP, effects on time management, opinion of users regarding error prevention, and usefulness of the information provided. Opinions were generally favorable; most users felt that CP makes their work more accurate, reduces errors, is easy to learn and to use, and provides important and useful information. Physicians were most critical of equipment failure and drugs and dosages not included in the CP program, a result of rapid development of the system. Errors resulting from the use of CP were considered minimal. Comparison of physicians, with and without previous experience with computer work, as well as local and foreign graduates, revealed minor differences. But once physicians learn to work with a well-organized CP system and computerized work stations, they appreciate the order, safety and knowledge they provide.

Clinical Pharmacy Information Systems↗

Feasibility study of multicentre comparison of NHS hospital pharmacy computer data.

AIMS: This study aims to determine the feasibility of collecting, collating and analysing drug expenditure data from a sample of acute hospitals in England. METHODS: The hospital pharmacy computer system was used to report on drug expenditure from 16 hospitals throughout England for a 2 year period. These data were analysed as a whole and hospital episode statistics were correlated to hospital drug costs. RESULTS: Hospital outpatient costs were found to be approximately one third of hospital inpatient costs. Cardiovascular drugs accounted for the greatest increase in expenditure for both inpatients and outpatients (25%). The most expensive therapeutic area of drug use across all sites was anti-infectives. The average daily number of occupied beds explained 55% of the variation in inpatient expenditure and the number of outpatient (including Accident and Emergency) attendances explained 60% of the outpatient drug expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: This project has confirmed the feasibility of collecting, collating and analysing hospital drug expenditure and identified some interesting patterns and trends in hospital drug use. Hospital activity is reflected in hospital drug costs.

Clinical Pharmacy Information Systems↗