PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10172265

Protocol for the Multicenter Acute Stroke Trial--thrombolysis study.

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The rationale for the Multicenter Acute Stroke Trial (MAST) is presented in a companion article appearing in this issue. Acute ischaemic stroke is the third major cause of death in developed countries, and a major cause of disability. Despite a very poor prognosis, no treatment has demonstrated an efficacy in lowering the mortality and disability resulting from stroke events. Thrombolysis has been proven to reduce mortality in myocardial infarction, and it has been shown able to induce recanalisation when administered to acute stroke patients. A recent meta analysis of small-sized studies suggests that thrombolysis could offer some benefit to stroke patients, by reducing the mortality and severe invalidity by 56%; these results need to be confirmed in adequately designed and sized studies.

Explore related subjects

Brain IschemiaCerebrovascular DisordersClinical ProtocolsData CollectionPersons with DisabilitiesDouble-Blind MethodFollow-Up StudiesHumansPatient SelectionPlacebosRecurrenceResearch DesignSafetySample SizeStreptokinaseSurvival RateThrombolytic TherapyTreatment OutcomeClinical TrialJournal ArticleMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

1993. Protocol for the Multicenter Acute Stroke Trial--thrombolysis study.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10172265/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Is diabetic retinopathy an independent risk factor for ischemic stroke?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The relationship between diabetic retinopathy and ischemic stroke is uncertain and examined in this study. METHODS: A population-based, prospective cohort study of 1617 middle-aged persons with diabetes. Diabetic retinopathy signs were ascertained from retinal photographs, and incident ischemic stroke events were prospectively identified and validated. RESULTS: Over an average follow-up of 7.8 years, there were 75 ischemic stroke events. After adjustment for age, gender, race, center, 6-year mean arterial blood pressure, anti-hypertensive treatment use, fasting glucose, insulin treatment, duration of diabetes, high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and cigarette smoking status, diabetic retinopathy was associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke (hazard rate ratio, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.13 to 4.86). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic retinopathy predicts incident ischemic stroke in people with diabetes, independent of other risk factors.

Brain Ischemia↗
PubMed2006

Hypothermia for the treatment of neonatal ischemic encephalopathy: is the genie out of the bottle?

Evidence suggests that hypothermia for hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in the term neonate may decrease the risk of death or neurodevelopmental impairment. The objective of this study was to determine how hypothermia has been incorporated into practice. An anonymous survey was sent to medical directors of United States neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in October 2005. We received completed surveys from 441 (54.5%) of 809 of NICUs. Only 6.4% of respondents used hypothermia. The most common method was total body cooling (64.3%) compared with head cooling (25%) or both (10.7%). At centers that did not offer hypothermia, 29% transferred infants to an institution that did. Centers that offered hypothermia were more likely at academic institutions (76.9%) compared with private practices (11.5%; p < 0.001). Hypothermia was more likely offered at institutions that offered extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO; 57%) than centers where ECMO was not offered (43%; p < 0.001). There has not been widespread use of hypothermia. There are a variety of protocols used. As results of further outcome studies become available, educational efforts and national practice guidelines will be essential.

Brain Ischemia↗
PubMed2006

Hemorrhagic complications after off-label thrombolysis for ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Only 2% to 4% of patients with acute ischemic stroke receive thrombolytic therapy resulting from the current strict inclusion criteria among other issues. Safety of intravenous and intraarterial thrombolysis in off-label situations is controversially discussed. We sought to review the reports on such patients regarding intra- and extracranial hemorrhage. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: A MEDLINE search for off-label uses of thrombolysis revealed reports on 273 patients treated with intraarterial or intravenous thrombolysis for ischemic stroke. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 19 of 273 patients (6.95%) and extracranial hemorrhage in 17 of 273 (6.22%). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the overall bleeding risk in off-label thrombolysis may not be as high as presumed. However, the small number of patients in each group and the likely underreporting of worse outcomes preclude drawing any conclusion as to specific treatment recommendations. Selected patients might benefit, however, from thrombolysis in situations not currently considered in the inclusion criteria. To obtain a meaningful database, a registry for off-label thrombolysis should be created.

Brain Ischemia↗