PubMed · 10173002
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
T R Waurzyniak. 1997. Back to basics.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10173002/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The response of the abdominal muscles to voluntary contraction of the pelvic floor (PF) muscles was investigated in women with no history of symptoms of stress urinary incontinence to determine whether there is co-activation of the muscles surrounding the abdominal cavity during exercises for the PF muscles. Electromyographic (EMG) activity of each of the abdominal muscles was recorded with fine-wire electrodes in seven parous females. Subjects contracted the PF muscles maximally in three lumbar spine positions while lying supine. In all subjects, the EMG activity of the abdominal muscles was increased above the baseline level during contractions of the PF muscles in at least one of the spinal positions. The amplitude of the increase in EMG activity of obliquus externus abdominis was greatest when the spine was positioned in flexion and the increase in activity of transversus abdominis was greater than that of rectus abdominis and obliquus externus abdominis when the spine was positioned in extension. In an additional pilot experiment, EMG recordings were made from the pubococcygeus and the abdominal muscles with fine-wire electrodes in two subjects during the performance of three different sub-maximal isometric abdominal muscle maneuvers. Both subjects showed an increase in EMG activity of the pubococcygeus with each abdominal muscle contraction. The results of these experiments indicate that abdominal muscle activity is a normal response to PF exercise in subjects with no symptoms of PF muscle dysfunction and provide preliminary evidence that specific abdominal exercises activate the PF muscles.
BACKGROUND: Abdominal wall wound failure remains a common surgical problem. The signals that activate normal fibroplastic repair versus regeneration pathways are unknown. Transforming growth factor beta levels rise during incisional healing but fall during hepatic regeneration. Changes in the injured host cytokine milieu may therefore differentially effect abdominal wall repair versus hepatic regeneration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight rats were divided into four groups (n = 12). Groups 1-3 underwent sham celiotomy, 70% hepatectomy, or 80% enterectomy with anastamosis. Incisions from Group 4 were treated with either 1 microg of transforming growth factor beta(2) (TGF-beta(2)) or vehicle following hepatectomy. Isolated fascial and dermal incisions were harvested and tested for breaking strength on POD 7. Serum (TGF-beta(2)) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) levels were measured by ELISA. RESULTS: Recovery of incisional wound breaking strength was delayed following hepatectomy but not enterectomy (P<0.002). The inhibitory effect was observed in both the fascia and the dermis of the abdominal wall. TGF-beta(2) levels were depressed in hepatectomy animals on POD 7, while at the same time HGF levels were elevated. Exogenous TGF-beta(2) shifted the healing trajectory of deficient wounds back toward a control pattern. CONCLUSION: Abdominal wall fascial and dermal healing is delayed during hepatic regeneration. Elevated HGF and depressed TGF-beta(2) suggest a host mechanism that prioritizes hepatic parenchymal regeneration over fibroplastic repair (scar). Observations such as these are needed as therapeutic wound healing enters the clinical realm.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.