PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10192031

[Leg perforating veins].

Abstract

Our knowledge of the so-called incompetent leg perforating veins remains questionable. Anatomic and hemodynamic studies show that perforators in a healthy subject do not always convey inward flowing blood. Are incompetent perforating veins more frequent with increasing severity of chronic venous disease? Answering this question is difficult as no consensus has been established on how to assess incompetent leg perforating veins and we have no gold standard to refer to. The number of incompetent leg perforating veins is generally greater in severe chronic venous disease although their frequency in clinical stage 4 to 6 (CEAP classification) is not statistically different. This means that incompetent leg perforating veins are not markers of severity of chronic venous insufficiency. When analyzing published series which take into account etiology (primary or secondary venous diseases) the frequency of incompetent perforating veins is variable. Is surgical management required when incompetent leg perforating veins are present? Angiologists and surgeons have not come to an agreement on this point. What can be recommended today? It is generally accepted that the more severe the disease the more worthwhile surgical treatment. Technically speaking, subfascial endoscopic ligature is a promising new method although long-term results are still lacking. We must watch carefully the prospective and randomized studies which have been started in different countries. A lot of questions, only a few reliable answers.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Perrin. 1999. [Leg perforating veins].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10192031/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia resulting from preceding exposure to heparin catheter flushes.

Immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening adverse effect of heparin. It can result from any type of heparin exposure and by any route of administration; however only a few cases are reported after exposures to small quantities of heparin from catheter flushes. The major clinical problem associated with HIT is thrombosis. Early detection and institution of alternative, non-heparin anticoagulation are important. We report a patient with HIT associated with use of therapeutic-dose unfractionated heparin in whom immune sensitization to heparin was triggered by two 500-unit exposure to UFH associated with intravascular catheter flushing for antineoplastic chemotherapy in a patient with colon adenocarcinoma.

Catheterization↗