PubMed · 10209723
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
R P Mills. 1999. Glaucoma imaging: technology in progress.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10209723/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Herein, the authors (a) review the status of the specialty; (b) report and analyze the various areas in which progress has occurred, namely, conventional radiology and picture archiving and communication systems (or PACS), ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, interventional radiology, and nuclear medicine; and (c) discuss the problems radiology faces as it enters the new millennium. The problems are those facing medicine as a whole, as well as those threatening the future of radiology. These include the following: Will there be a need for radiologists in the future? Will radiology be too costly to be affordable? How can turf wars and fragmentation be solved? Possible remedies are suggested. Positive aspects are discussed in the light of the challenge to demonstrate value. Medical imaging is entering the new millennium with a solid record of recent advances in digital, cross-sectional, and interventional radiology. These advances have made the specialty indispensable in the treatment of patients. Careful statesmanship will be needed to solve the many problems that face medicine as a whole and radiology in particular.
During the past 25 years, medical imaging research has progressed in both scope and quality. Factors intrinsic to the specialty and changes occurring in medicine and society have fostered imaging research development. The advent of new, computer-based technologies that can be brought to bear on research, the increasing sophistication of researchers, and the greater availability of extramural funding have been primary factors in the promulgation of research improvements. Radiology researchers have the opportunity to play an important role in the genesis of the molecular medicine of the future. Whether they do so is dependent on whether radiologists identify necessary resources, new researchers receive appropriate training, and investigators are willing to think differently than they have in the past about the capabilities of imaging.