PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10227911

Tip points: defining the tip.

Abstract

At the center of the tip, the tip points (TPs) are the single most defining feature of a nose. In a random survey (N = 146; females, 76; males, 70), TPs were 8.9 +/- 1.6 mm apart. TP quality was graded into four categories based on the criteria of presence, interdomal crease, base width, and distinction. The distributions of TPs according to TPG were as follows: I, 12%; II, 50%; III, 30%; and IV, 8%. The TPG system was applied to a collection of photographs of female Caucasian magazine models, which had a distribution similar to that of the Caucasian females in the study population, demonstrating the effectiveness of grading. Surgical guidelines for the preservation and generation of TPs are presented, especially the geometric consequence of various surgical maneuvers, e.g., dome division and tip graft.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Burres. Tip points: defining the tip.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002669900252

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

What is research?

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Data Collection↗

[Exchange of paraclinical information between the primary and secondary health sectors].

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the study was to investigate the extent to which, biochemical test results obtained in the primary health sector could be regarded as valid information in the clinical assessment of patients admitted to hospital. METHODS: The study was based on a questionnaire, which was designed to assess the value of historical biochemical data in the initial diagnostic process. The data was transferred from the laboratory of Copenhagen general practitioners (KPLL) database to a computer terminal in the emergency medical ward at H:S Bispebjerg Hospital. RESULTS: It was possible to assess historical KPLL data on close to 80% of all hospitalised patients. In 50% of these patients, doctors indicated that the data always (96%) contributed to the diagnosis. In 70%, the data further contributed to the subsequent planning of diagnostic strategy. With regard to the initial diagnosis, comparison of KPLL data with data obtained on admission always resulted in a further classification of at least one condition. The comparison of KPLL data with admission data always led to a more precise plan for further diagnostic strategy. CONCLUSION: The comparison of KPLL data with admission data, significantly contributes to differentiate the initial diagnostic strategy. In turn, this seems to have a significant bearing on the planning of further diagnostic strategy. It is postulated that a computer-based information system, through which the primary and secondary health sectors can exchange patient-related clinical data, would lead to a more focused use of resources, and hold significant advantages for the patient.

Data Collection↗