PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10243432

Community placements.

M Bridle·E Bell
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A pilot study at Queen's University on the use of community facilities for undergraduate clinical training is described. The objectives of this project were to provide broadening experiences for students outside the institutional model, and to increase the number of available placements. From both the faculty and student points of view, the project is considered a success and is being expanded. The authors suggest that the future therapist must be prepared for community practice and recommend the inclusion of similar experiences in all undergraduate occupational therapy programmes.

Explore related subjects

Community Health ServicesOccupational TherapyOntarioPilot ProjectsPreceptorshipUniversitiesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Bridle, E Bell. 1975. Community placements.. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841747504200104

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

The evidence debate.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Community Health Services↗
PubMed2001

Measuring later health status of high risk infants: randomised comparison of two simple methods of data collection.

OBJECTIVE: To test two methods of providing low cost information on the later health status of survivors of neonatal intensive care. DESIGN: Cluster randomised comparison. SETTING: Nine hospitals distributed across two UK health regions. Each hospital was randomised to use one of two methods of follow up. PARTICIPANTS: All infants born </=32 weeks' gestation during 1997 in the study hospitals. METHOD: Families were recruited at the time of discharge. In one method of follow up families were asked to complete a questionnaire about their child's health at the age of 2 years (corrected for gestation). In the other method the children's progress was followed by clerks in the local community child health department by using sources of routine information. RESULTS: 236 infants were recruited to each method of follow up. Questionnaires were returned by 214 parents (91%; 95% confidence interval 84% to 97%) and 223 clerks (95%; 86% to 100%). Completed questionnaires were returned by 201 parents (85%; 76% to 94%) and 158 clerks (67%; 43% to 91%). Most parents found the forms easy to complete, but some had trouble understanding the concept of "corrected age" and hence when to return the form. Community clerks often had to rely on information that was out of date and difficult to interpret. CONCLUSION: Neither questionnaires from parents nor routinely collected health data are adequate methods of providing complete follow up data on children who were born preterm and required neonatal intensive care, though both methods show potential.

Community Health Services↗