PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10265748

User-centered evaluation.

Abstract

Much has been written on graduate medical education and its evaluation. Seldom, however, are mentioned the uses made or the benefits of such evaluations. Drawing on current models for increasing the use of information from external evaluations, the authors offer a user-centered approach for increasing the use of results from internal evaluations, the more typical form of evaluation in graduate medical education. The over-riding emphasis of the user-centered approach to evaluation is the utility of the resultant data. Three features characterize user-centered evaluation: an ordered set of steps with usefulness as the primary concern at each step; delineation of evaluator and decision-maker roles; and attention to the general communication aspects of evaluation. This article describes these three characteristics, concluding with two fundamental points: (1) A user-centered approach to evaluation will help evaluation do what it is supposed to do: provide information that gets used to increase the effectiveness of everyday decisions. (2) A user-centered evaluation accomplishes this, first, by having a pervasive attitude of utility and, second, by carefully attending to the three characteristic features of this approach to evaluation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C J Bland, J A Ullian, D G Froberg. 1984. User-centered evaluation.. https://doi.org/10.1177/016327878400700104

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Physicians and joint negotiations.

This position paper of the American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine addresses public policy issues related to physicians' joining to negotiate issues affecting patient care and the working environment in which patient services are provided. It seeks to identify an appropriate way for physicians to negotiate jointly with health care plans while maintaining professionalism and keeping the interests of patients paramount. It proposes that physicians in nonintegrated private practices should be able to meet and communicate among themselves for the purpose of negotiating primarily with health care plans about specific issues that affect quality and access. However, the College opposes strikes or any joint action by physicians that would deny or limit services to patients or result in price-fixing or other anticompetitive behavior. The College states that employed physicians should continue to have negotiating rights. It maintains, despite a recent decision by the National Labor Relations Board, that physicians in residency training are protected by accreditation requirements for programs of graduate medical education, and education content should not be subject to negotiations [corrected]. Physicians in residency training are protected by accreditation requirements for programs of graduate medical education, and educational content should not be subject to negotiations. The College also calls for determination of negotiating units for physicians but recommends that nonphysician providers not be included in the same units as physicians. Membership in an organization that negotiates for physicians should be voluntary, and conflict-resolution mechanisms must be available for resolving impasses.

Education, Medical, Graduate↗