PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

J A Ullian

Publications and source records attributed to J A Ullian.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Integrating early clinical experience curricula at two medical schools: lessons learned from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Generalist Physician Initiative.

The University of Texas Medical Branch and Eastern Virginia Medical School have created community-based generalist clinical experiences early in the first two years of medical school as part of The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Generalist Physician Initiative. This article describes these experiences and related curricula, outlining the common elements and differing approaches at the two institutions. It discusses the success of the new curriculum, presenting information from performance measures and surveys of students, clerkship directors, and faculty involved in the programs, and it describes further evaluative studies being planned. The authors discuss nine lessons learned and their conclusion that early clinical experience with generalist physicians is an important element of generalist curriculum reform. It improves student satisfaction with the first two years' experience and provides a structure for teaching patient-centered, integrated clinical medicine, which is important in the general professional education of all students. Whether or not the long-term goal of increasing students' interest in generalist careers is realized, incorporating early clinical experiences with generalists into a curriculum has positive effects on students, faculty, and the overall curriculum.

Curriculum

Types of faculty development programs.

This paper offers an overview of faculty development program types, with references to specific programs described in the recent literature. Faculty development programs have been categorized in a number of ways. This review uses a variation of those typologies and suggests six types of faculty development activities: 1) organizational strategies, 2) fellowships, 3) comprehensive local programs, 4) workshops and seminars, 5) continuing medical education, and 6) individual activities. While these categories provide a conceptual basis for distinguishing among programs, actual programs in use often contain elements of more than on type.

Curriculum

An alternative approach to defining the role of the clinical teacher.

BACKGROUND: A number of studies have attempted to identify the components of the clinical teacher role by examining learners' numerical ratings of items on researcher-generated lists. Some of these studies have also compared different groups' perceptions of clinical teaching, but have not directly compared the perceptions of first- and third-year residents. This study addressed two questions: (1) What do residents consider important components of the clinical teacher role? (2) Do first- and third-year residents perceive this role similarly? METHOD: A content analysis was performed on the comments written on evaluation forms by 268 residents about 490 clinical teachers over a five-year period (1980-81 through 1984-85) at a large family practice residency. Of 5,664 forms completed by the residents, 2,388 (42%) contained written comments; comments were on 1,024 (46%) of the first-year resident's forms, 701 (41%) of the second-year residents' forms, and 663 (39%) of the third-year residents' forms. Themes in these comments were coded into a coding dictionary of 157 categories, within 37 clusters, within four roles. RESULTS: The ten highest-ranked categories (Global; Teaching: General; Knowledgeable; Gives Resident Responsibility; Supportive; Miscellaneous; Interested in Teaching; Clinical Competence; Makes Effort to Teach; and Gives Resident Opportunity to Do Procedures) accounted for 41% of the themes coded. The first- and third-year residents differed in the clusters they used to describe their clinical teachers on evaluation forms (chi 2 = 149.86, df = 36, p < .0001). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that content analysis can be used to validly and reliably study residents' written evaluative comments about their teachers. This study contributes to the definition of the clinical teacher role, showing the relative importances of its components, and also supports Stritter's Learning Vector theory, finding the anticipated differences between the comments made by first- and third-year residents.

Clinical Competence

Teaching medical decision making and students' clinical problem solving skills.

Medical students need to be taught explicitly about decision making to be prepared for the changing health care environment. Medical decision making curricula have received favourable responses from students and have influenced some aspects of student performance. Questions remain about the impact of the teaching on students' general problem solving skills. A 15 hour course covering decision making topics was presented during a preclinical elective preceptorship for 5 years. Problem solving ratings made by clinical supervisors for the third year psychiatry and internal medicine clerkships were not better for the students who had the instruction and clinical experience than for the students in the comparison group. The results suggest that this approach to teaching decision making requires further development and testing.

Curriculum

User-centered evaluation.

Much has been written on graduate medical education and its evaluation. Seldom, however, are mentioned the uses made or the benefits of such evaluations. Drawing on current models for increasing the use of information from external evaluations, the authors offer a user-centered approach for increasing the use of results from internal evaluations, the more typical form of evaluation in graduate medical education. The over-riding emphasis of the user-centered approach to evaluation is the utility of the resultant data. Three features characterize user-centered evaluation: an ordered set of steps with usefulness as the primary concern at each step; delineation of evaluator and decision-maker roles; and attention to the general communication aspects of evaluation. This article describes these three characteristics, concluding with two fundamental points: (1) A user-centered approach to evaluation will help evaluation do what it is supposed to do: provide information that gets used to increase the effectiveness of everyday decisions. (2) A user-centered evaluation accomplishes this, first, by having a pervasive attitude of utility and, second, by carefully attending to the three characteristic features of this approach to evaluation.

Education, Medical, Graduate