PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10271921

Clinical training program for staff pharmacists.

Abstract

This study describes the development and evaluation of a clinical training program in the areas of pharmacokinetics and infectious diseases for staff pharmacists in a decentralized unit dose drug distribution system. Five staff pharmacists were trained and three other pharmacists served as controls. The teaching sessions consisted of eight 1-hour lectures per group of two to three pharmacists. The lectures were supplemented by handouts, reading assignments, and practical assignments. There was a significant improvement in posttest scores of the trained pharmacists when compared to their pretest scores and from the scores of the control pharmacists. In the Seattle VA Medical Center pharmacy, this program was shown to be successful, and a similar program can be used to train staff pharmacists in other clinical areas of interest.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R M Gopinath, N T Suzuki. 1985. Clinical training program for staff pharmacists.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10271921/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Epidemiology of infections after solid-organ transplantation.

Infections are a major determinant of the outcome of solid-organ transplantation. Their incidence varies because of a number of factors. The type of organ transplanted, the degree of immunosuppression, the need for additional antirejection therapy, and the occurrence of technical or surgical complications all affect the incidence of infection after transplantation. There are 3 general time frames to consider. In the first month, bacterial and candidal infections predominate. From the second through the sixth months, infections "classically" associated with transplantation become manifest. Beyond the sixth month, the clinical course is largely determined by the presence or absence of chronic rejection.

Cross Infection↗

Antimicrobial resistance prevalence rates in hospital antibiograms reflect prevalence rates among pathogens associated with hospital-acquired infections.

To determine whether routine antibiograms (summaries reporting resistance of all tested isolates) reflect resistance rates among pathogens associated with hospital-acquired infections, we compared data collected from 2 different surveillance components in the same 166 intensive care units (ICUs). ICUs reported data during the same months to both the infection-based surveillance and the laboratory-based surveillance. Paired comparisons of the percentage of isolates resistant were made between systems within each ICU. No significant differences existed (P>.05) between the percentage of isolates resistant from the infection-based system and laboratory-based system for all antimicrobial-resistant organisms studied, except methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus species. The mean difference in percentage resistance was higher from the infection-based system than the laboratory-based system for S. aureus (mean difference, +8%, P<.001) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (mean difference, +9%, P<.001). Overall, hospital antibiograms reflected susceptibility patterns among isolates associated with hospital-acquired infections. Hospital antibiograms may underestimate the relative frequency of methicillin resistance among Staphylococcus species when associated with hospital-acquired infections.

Cross Infection↗