PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10276395

Keeping the program in-house.

Abstract

The Scott and White Medical Institution identified a need to provide management development to its first-line, middle, and upper management personnel. What kind of program would have institution-wide appeal, application, controlled implementation, and maintenance, and at the same time could be delivered for a reasonable cost and enhance communication? Scott and White found the answer through an in-house, multi-level development program that utilizes available managers as speakers. From the beginning, managers throughout the institution became involved in the development of the program. Their early involvement ensured ease of implementation, appropriate program content, and evaluation. This effective management development program is an excellent model for a medical group seeking to further develop its team of managers.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B Wohleb, K S Haddock. Keeping the program in-house.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10276395/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Modernisation. Fear of flying.

Interviews with senior managers and clinicians involved in the national booking programme and cancer care collaborative found that scepticism, particularly among doctors, was a barrier to implementing change. Regular feedback and clear evidence of change emerged as key factors in persuading sceptics of the benefits of different ways of working. Getting sceptics on board can be a long process and time spent talking to them is not wasted. Consultants' support is key for endorsing change.

Administrative Personnel↗

The clinical governance of the soul: 'deep management' and the self-regulating subject in integrated community mental health teams.

Health professionals have often been described as if they were in conflict with the new managerialist spirit in health care. However, because of their distributed and mobile sites of intervention, the work of community teams presents particular problems for traditional notions of management. In this UK study we identify how mental health team members are regulated by means of a subtle 'deep management'. Team members point to a lack of management direction from senior colleagues, even though some of them participate in the management process themselves. However, the lack of overt management leads them to prioritise clients and foreground professional identities in performing their duties and much additional administrative work besides. This also meant that the organisational structure-the team-was defined in subjective terms. Participants had become self-regulating 'deep managed' subjects under a largely hands-off management regime.

Administrative Personnel↗