PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10283159

Ethylene oxide--back to basics.

Abstract

Work in the field of Ethylene Oxide (E.O.) sterilisation at the Castle Company began in the 1950s. During that time, Castle has been actively involved in the changing technology associated with the use of E.O. as a sterilising agent in industry and health care facilities. Ethylene oxide is a valuable and indispensable part of modern medicine and today we will discuss common sense methods and procedures for its safe use.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R E Arnold. 1987. Ethylene oxide--back to basics.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10283159/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Corporate financial decision-makers' perceptions of workplace safety.

This study, through a random national survey, explored how senior financial executives or managers (those who determined high-level budget, resource allocation, and corporate priorities) of medium-to-large companies perceive important workplace safety issues. The three top-rated safety priorities in resource allocation reported by the participants (overexertion, repetitive motion, and bodily reaction) were consistent with the top three perceived causes of workers' compensation losses. The greatest single safety concerns reported were overexertion, repetitive motion, highway accidents, falling on the same level and bodily reaction. A majority of participants believed that the indirect costs associated with workplace injury were higher than the direct costs. Our participants believed that money spent improving workplace safety would have significant returns. The perceived top benefits of an effective workplace safety program were increased productivity, reduced cost, retention, and increased satisfaction among employees. The perceived most important safety modification was safety training. The top reasons senior financial executives gave for believing their safety programs were better than those at other companies were that their companies paid more attention to and emphasized safety, they had better classes and training focused on safety, and they had teams/individuals focused specifically on safety.

Accident Prevention↗