PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 10283481

Improving patient care through problem-solving groups.

Abstract

In a competitive healthcare environment where as much attention must be given to quality of care as to cost containment, hospitals must learn to involve their lowest-paid paraprofessionals in decision making, since often these people have as much or more contact with patients than do physicians and nurses. One effective employee-involvement technique is the problem-solving group (PSG), which works to identify, analyze, choose, and implement solutions to various problems that influence the quality of patient care. A PSG project involving a typical paraprofessional unit was begun in spring 1985 at Emory University Hospital, Atlanta. The project's developmental stages were the following: Gathering data; Identifying problems; Providing feedback; Selecting PSG members; Focusing on problems; Generating solutions; Choosing the best solution; Implementing solutions; Managing successful outcomes. The PSG project was successful in addressing almost all the 15 identified problems in the department. Involving the staff in the PSG project resulted in higher morale, greater satisfaction with management, and a more favorable attitude toward their jobs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Barger, P Hofmann, J Shumake, W Davies. 1987. Improving patient care through problem-solving groups.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10283481/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Physicians' ethical beliefs about cost-control arrangements.

BACKGROUND: Although much has been written about the ethics of new methods of health care financing, little is known about the extent to which physicians experience these cost-control arrangements as ethical problems. METHOD: A cross-sectional telephone survey of 1,549 physicians, 8 to 17 years after residency, randomly selected from 75 US metropolitan service areas (response rate, 74.0%). RESULTS: Only 17.0% believed that financial incentives to limit services are ethically acceptable. Although 52.9% thought that physicians should try to abide by guidelines discouraging the use of interventions with possible but unproven benefit, only 14.5% thought such guidelines should be enforced by payers. Only 5.7% thought that it was morally acceptable for payers to discourage physicians from telling patients about their personal financial incentives, and only 9.1% found compliance with such restrictions morally acceptable. Changes in the health care system in the past 5 years were believed to have had a negative impact on their own patients' trust in them by 50.6%, and 80.8% believed that changes in the health care system in the past decade have diminished physicians' commitment to an ethic of undivided loyalty to patients. In multiple regression analysis, physicians who reported that the overall personal financial incentives in their practices encouraged them to reduce services were significantly more likely to have ethical objections to such incentives, to believe their own patients' trust in them had diminished, and to believe that the ethic of undivided loyalty to patients had diminished. CONCLUSIONS: Many of the methods now commonly used to influence medical decision making are considered ethically objectionable by most midcareer physicians. Whether their ethical disquiet about these arrangements is justified cannot be answered from these data.

Attitude of Health Personnel

Do you believe in God?

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Attitude of Health Personnel