PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10284991

What knowledge-accessing modes tell administrators about interdisciplinary crises and conflicts.

Abstract

In hospitals administrators work with two major groups of medical professionals: physicians and nurses. Together, these three groups of professionals are primarily responsible for the care of patients. The quality of the service they provide is dependent on the working relationships among these disciplines. Potentially, the more harmony among administrators, physicians, and nurses, the better care patients can receive. The research reported in this article addresses the issue of interdisciplinary misunderstanding among these groups of professionals. The research was premised on the assumption that hospital administrators, physicians, and nurses differ in the way they access knowledge. That is, administrators, physicians, and nurses access knowledge in dissimilar ways and, by doing so, set the stage for crises and conflicts. Using a standardized instrument to assess knowledge-accessing modes, data were collected from samples of health administration, medical, and nursing students. The data indicated that the three groups did differ in the way they accessed knowledge. The individual discipline profiles generated from the data also revealed a finding common to the three disciplines, a finding may help resolve a very real problem for hospital patients. Based on the research results, the article discusses ways that administrators may be able to prevent crises and conflicts and enhance harmonious relations among the three disciplines, and thereby improve patient care. Avenues for further research are also suggested.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K A Noble, R Rancourt. 1987. What knowledge-accessing modes tell administrators about interdisciplinary crises and conflicts.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10284991/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety.

Mishandled concerns about clinical standards resulted in whistleblowing in four Australian hospitals. Official inquiries followed with recommendations to improve patient safety. In the aftermath of the inquiries, common themes included loss of trust in management and among clinical colleagues, and loss of trust from patients and the community. Without first rebuilding trust, staff will not report mistakes or other concerns about safety. Successful implementation of patient safety procedures requires policies to stress the professional duty of staff to report concerns about colleagues when they believe there is a risk to patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Retrieving the ars moriendi tradition.

North Atlantic culture lacks a commonly shared view on dying well that helps the dying, their social environment and caregivers to determine their place and role, interpret death and deal with the process of ethical deliberation. What is lacking nowadays, however, has been part of Western culture in medieval times and was known as the ars moriendi (art of dying well) tradition. In this paper an updated version of this tradition is presented that meets the demands of present day secularized and multiform society. Five themes are central to the new art of dying: autonomy and the self, pain control and medical intervention, attachment and relations, life balance and guilt, death and afterlife. The importance of retrieving the ancient ars moriendi outreaches the boundaries of palliative medicine, since it deals with issues that play a central role in every context of medical intervention and treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗