PubMed · 10285512
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
T J Mason. Pukeora directions.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10285512/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
In 1951 when TB Control Law was legislated, and the government of Japan started intensive TB programme mainly consisting of mass health examination, BCG vaccination and distribution of appropriate treatment for TB cases, there were about 100,000 beds for TB, similar to the number of then TB deaths, and many TB patients died before admission to sanatoria. Urgent measures were taken to increase beds for TB with a target of 250,000, 2.5 times of then TB death. The target was achieved in 1957. Thereafter, the number of beds for TB as well as the occupancy rate had decreased with the decline of TB, and then policy on beds for TB could be summarized as follows: (1) top priority was given to increase the number of beds for TB, (2) general hospitals were improved with the progress of medical science and economic development, while no improvement was done on TB beds with the assumption that the need for TB beds will soon disappear, (3) minimum unit of TB beds was a TB ward with generally 40 to 50 beds, (4) an idea to provide TB bed in a general hospital came out only since 1992 as a small model project, (5) it was intended to segregate infectious TB patients from the community, however, no consideration was made about super-infection among patients themselves and the infection to health care workers, (6) admission of TB cases to a general bed and admission of non-TB cases to a TB ward was not legally permitted, (7) cost for TB treatment was set on a low level. Recent data indicate that the occupancy rate of TB beds was 43.5%, and the average stay in TB beds is still slightly over 100 days, and observing by prefectures, marked differences were seen. Taking into account changes in the pattern on TB patients such as aging and the increase of cases with serious complications and most health care workers in TB wards are not yet infected with TB, it is needed to divide TB beds into two types, one for new cases and the other for chronic cases. Beds for new cases should be provided in principle as a single room in a general hospital with good ventilation system, and DOT should be started in a hospital. Stay in this type of bed should not exceed 2 months, and higher medical fee should be provided. Beds for chronic cases could be provided in a TB ward. MDRTB cases are admitted in bed for chronic cases, however, preferably in a single room, and if active intervention such as chest surgery is tried in a few sophisticated hospital, medical fee for acute bed should be applied. Now, we have to change our mind from old concept of beds in TB ward to a TB bed in a single room with good ventilation.
The critical access hospital program looks like a success so far, keeping vulnerable rural facilities from closing and maintaining a continuum of care in communities where the next nearest hospital might be hours away. Although conversions can be bumpy, one in four rural hospitals is now a CAH and that number is increasing.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.