PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10290491

Biosafety practices in pathology laboratories.

Abstract

A study was undertaken of the biosafety status of all public sector based pathology laboratories in N.S.W. Questionnaires were sent to all 85 departments. A total of 71 completed questionnaires were returned from the laboratory managers, representing a response rate of 84%. The study showed that many departments have not yet implemented the recent AIDS Task Force code of biosafety practice for laboratories. Relatively poor practices were identified in the handling and transport of patient samples, the disposal of infected waste and the use of equipment not designed for aerosol containment. Continuous safety training for staff and regular external assessments of laboratories were recommended as possible measures to improve the biosafety standards of pathology departments.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Isouard. 1988. Biosafety practices in pathology laboratories.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10290491/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Corporate financial decision-makers' perceptions of workplace safety.

This study, through a random national survey, explored how senior financial executives or managers (those who determined high-level budget, resource allocation, and corporate priorities) of medium-to-large companies perceive important workplace safety issues. The three top-rated safety priorities in resource allocation reported by the participants (overexertion, repetitive motion, and bodily reaction) were consistent with the top three perceived causes of workers' compensation losses. The greatest single safety concerns reported were overexertion, repetitive motion, highway accidents, falling on the same level and bodily reaction. A majority of participants believed that the indirect costs associated with workplace injury were higher than the direct costs. Our participants believed that money spent improving workplace safety would have significant returns. The perceived top benefits of an effective workplace safety program were increased productivity, reduced cost, retention, and increased satisfaction among employees. The perceived most important safety modification was safety training. The top reasons senior financial executives gave for believing their safety programs were better than those at other companies were that their companies paid more attention to and emphasized safety, they had better classes and training focused on safety, and they had teams/individuals focused specifically on safety.

Accident Prevention↗