PubMed · 10301941
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M Nelson. Streamlining supply management.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10301941/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
CONTEXT: Vigorous physical exertion transiently increases the risk of acute myocardial infarction (MI), but little is known about the clinical characteristics of exertion-related MI. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical and angiographic characteristics of patients who had an exertion-related acute MI vs those who experienced an MI not related to exertion. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational cohort study of patients with an acute MI referred to a tertiary care hospital for primary angioplasty. PATIENTS: Of 1048 patients with acute MI, 640 (64 who experienced an exertion-related MI and 576 who did not) were selected for treatment with primary angioplasty and admitted between August 1995 and November 1998. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical characteristics of the patients, including their habitual physical activity (determined by the Framingham Physical Activity Index and the Lipid Research Clinic Physical Activity Questionnaire), angiographic findings during coronary angiography, and the relative risk (RR) of MI during exertion. RESULTS: Patients who experienced exertion-related MI were more frequently men (86% vs 68%), hyperlipidemic (62% vs 40%), and smokers (59% vs 37%), were more likely to present with ventricular fibrillation (20% vs 11%), Killip classification III or IV heart failure (44% vs 22%), single-vessel disease (50% vs 28%), and a large thrombus in the infarct artery (64% vs 35%) and were more likely to be classified as having very low or low activity (84% vs 66%). The RR of experiencing an MI during exertion was 10.1 times greater than the risk at other times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-65.6), with the highest risk among patients classified as very low active (RR, 30.5; 95% CI, 4.4-209.9) and low active (RR, 20.9; 95% CI, 3.1-142.1). CONCLUSION: These results show that exertion-related MIs occur in habitually inactive people with multiple cardiac risk factors. These individuals may benefit from modest exercise training and aggressive risk-factor modification before they perform vigorous physical activity.
BACKGROUND: The assessment of the impact of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on developmental outcomes in children who undergo open heart surgery is hampered by the absence of a suitable comparison group. The development of interventional catheterization techniques for the repair of certain types of congenital heart lesions provides the opportunity to study children who have not been exposed to CPB. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed standardized neuropsychological testing on children after closure of a secundum atrial septal defect through the use of surgery (n=26) or a transcatheter device (n=19). Device patients, compared with surgical patients, were similar in age at defect closure (mean, 6 years) but older at follow-up testing (12.3 versus 10.6 years). The mean weight percentile at closure was greater and the defect size was smaller in the device patients. Families of device patients tended to have a higher parent IQ, higher level of maternal education, and higher level of maternal occupation. In general, however, children's IQ and achievement scores were in the normal range for both groups. In regression analyses with adjustment for age at testing and parent IQ, surgical repair was associated with a 9.5-point deficit in Full-Scale IQ (P=0. 03) and a 9.7-point deficit in Performance IQ (P=0.05). Block Design was the IQ subtest on which treatment groups differed the most (P=0. 01). Surgical patients achieved significantly better scores on errors of commission (P=0.05) and attentiveness index (P=0.03) on a continuous performance test of attention. Scores on tests of achievement and other neuropsychological domains did not differ significantly between the groups. Regression analyses within the surgical group failed to identify significant CPB-related risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: A prospective randomized trial or a study that includes prerepair and postrepair assessments is necessary to establish whether the observed advantages of device closure in neuropsychological outcome represent deleterious effects of CPB or a methodological artifact.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.