PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10312510

DRGs and documentation: the information problem.

Abstract

Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) are becoming a new "information standard" for hospital comparisons in Europe. The availability of countrywide uniform medical record abstracts increased largely between 1982 and 1987 among EEC countries, following the definition of the European Minimum Basic Data Set. Diagnoses could easily be compared with reference to the ICD-9-CM code, while procedures have required mapping because the national coding schemes and because of the lack of an appropriate WHO classification for procedures. Financial data remain another area that should benefit from international comparisons. Data reliability depends largely on information uses and feedback to users. The AIM program of the EEC provides a good opportunity to initiate hospital data comparisons and to begin international research on indexes of severity, intensity and quality of care. The European scale is needed to compare hospital costs and outcomes with results from the U.S.A.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F H Roger. 1988. DRGs and documentation: the information problem.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(88)90034-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Searching biomedical databases on complementary medicine: the use of controlled vocabulary among authors, indexers and investigators.

BACKGROUND: The optimal retrieval of a literature search in biomedicine depends on the appropriate use of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), descriptors and keywords among authors and indexers. We hypothesized that authors, investigators and indexers in four biomedical databases are not consistent in their use of terminology in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM). METHODS: Based on a research question addressing the validity of spinal palpation for the diagnosis of neuromuscular dysfunction, we developed four search concepts with their respective controlled vocabulary and key terms. We calculated the frequency of MeSH, descriptors, and keywords used by authors in titles and abstracts in comparison to standard practices in semantic and analytic indexing in MEDLINE, MANTIS, CINAHL, and Web of Science. RESULTS: Multiple searches resulted in the final selection of 38 relevant studies that were indexed at least in one of the four selected databases. Of the four search concepts, validity showed the greatest inconsistency in terminology among authors, indexers and investigators. The use of spinal terms showed the greatest consistency. Of the 22 neuromuscular dysfunction terms provided by the investigators, 11 were not contained in the controlled vocabulary and six were never used by authors or indexers. Most authors did not seem familiar with the controlled vocabulary for validity in the area of neuromuscular dysfunction. Recently, standard glossaries have been developed to assist in the research development of manual medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Searching biomedical databases for CAM is challenging due to inconsistent use of controlled vocabulary and indexing procedures in different databases. A standard terminology should be used by investigators in conducting their search strategies and authors when writing titles, abstracts and submitting keywords for publications.

Abstracting and Indexing↗

SIRW: A web server for the Simple Indexing and Retrieval System that combines sequence motif searches with keyword searches.

SIRW (http://sirw.embl.de/) is a World Wide Web interface to the Simple Indexing and Retrieval System (SIR) that is capable of parsing and indexing various flat file databases. In addition it provides a framework for doing sequence analysis (e.g. motif pattern searches) for selected biological sequences through keyword search. SIRW is an ideal tool for the bioinformatics community for searching as well as analyzing biological sequences of interest.

Abstracting and Indexing↗