PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10313565

Developing a hospital emergency preparedness program.

Abstract

The emergency preparedness program is not a static entity that only needs to be taken off the shelf and looked at once or twice a year. The various components of the program require that it be a daily part of the hospital's routine. Only by becoming a part of the everyday operation of the hospital can the full benefits of an emergency preparedness program be realized in an actual disaster. A part of the recovery activities after a hospital experiences an actual disaster should be to examine all phases of the emergency preparedness program. The program should be viewed as if it were being designed from scratch. Time should be taken to identify any areas of weakness, develop a plan for making the necessary corrections, and then implement those corrections.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G C Beatty. 1987. Developing a hospital emergency preparedness program.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10313565/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The accreditation process of an Australian health fund's dental centre.

Accreditation by a recognised national quality control organisation is the ultimate accolade for any service provider. This paper describes the processes and procedures that were undertaken by an Australian Health Fund's dental centres for accreditation by the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards.

Accreditation↗

[Different methods for assessing quality in health sector].

AN OBLIGATION: The "management" of quality is an integral part of "medical" management today. The health centers and professionals have to prove their value and know-how through distinct signs of recognition. A METHOD FOR ASSESSING QUALITY: This paper defines the method of assessment of quality and specifies the typology of the persons, organisms, supervisors and clients of the French health system who have a personal or collective interest in judging the quality of health services. DIFFERENT POSSIBILITIES: Numerous existing methods for assessing quality are presented together with their use, implementation and the use made by the actors and consumers of the health system. Some of these assessment methods are formal, others informal, some are mandatory, others optional; some concern the general population, others the professionals. Although know-how is essential in health, making it known is strategic today.

Accreditation↗