PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10321852

Translating research into practice: a personal case study.

R Madhok
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Although much will change in the National Health Service as a result of the publication of the new White Paper, The new NHS: modern, dependable, the challenges of translating research into practice and ensuring evidence-based policy and practice will remain. This case study demonstrates some of the challenges and has important lessons for the future practice of public health medicine.

Explore related subjects

Absorptiometry, PhotonAgedEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporosisPractice Guidelines as TopicPublic HealthState MedicineUnited KingdomJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Madhok. 1999. Translating research into practice: a personal case study.. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed%2F21.1.3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

[Prevalence of osteoporosis assessed by densitometry in the Spanish female population].

BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic fractures represent an important clinic and socioeconomic problem. Although it is well known the incidence of fractures in Spain, we do not know how many persons are at risk. The World Health Organization (WHO) has approved a densitometric criteria to define osteopenia (OSPE) and osteoporosis (OSP). The aim of this study has been to evaluate the prevalence of OSP and OSPE in women of the Spanish population. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: With the data of a study of bone mass in the Spanish population, stratified according to age, using dual-energy X-ray absortiometry (DXA) with a QDR/1000 Hologic device and according the WHO criteria, we have calculated the prevalence of OSP and OSPE in normal Spanish women at the lumbar spine (LS) and/or femoral neck (FN). RESULTS: The prevalence of osteoporosis at LS is: 0.34% in the group aged 20-44 years; 4.31% in the group aged 45-49 years; up to 9.09% in the group aged 50-59 years; 24.29% in the 60-69 years, and 40.0% in the group aged 70-79 years. The overall prevalence of osteoporosis is 11.13%, confidence interval (CI) 95% from 9.4 to 12.8%. The prevalence of osteoporosis at FN is: 0.17% in the group aged 20-44 years, 0% in the 45-49 years, up to 1.3% in the 50-59 years, 5.71% in the 60-69 years and 24.24% in the group aged 70-79 years. The overall prevalence of osteoporosis is 4,29% (CI 95% 3.2-5.4%). The prevalence in female older than 50 years was 22.8% at LS and 9.1% at FN. 12.73% of Spanish women population has osteoporosis at LS or FN, which represent about 1,974,400 women; 2.68% of total population has osteoporosis in both sites. CONCLUSIONS: Even we do not include in this study women with established osteoporosis (with fractures), the number of Spanish women with osteoporosis is very high.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed2001

Osteoporosis in patients with paralysis after spinal cord injury. A cross sectional study in 46 male patients with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

In a cross-sectional study, 46 male patients with paralysis after spinal cord injury (average age 32 years; injuries sustained from 1 to 26 years ago; 33 Frankel A, 13 Frankel B, C, D) were examined clinically and by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Their bone mineral density (BMD) values were compared with age-related controls and correlated to clinical parameters. BMD was reduced in the proximal femur (p < 0.05) and the distal forearm (p < 0.05), but not in the lumbar spine. Demineralisation was influenced in the proximal femur (Z-score -2.95) by immobilisation after surgical treatment. Patients suffering from complete lesions had significantly lower BMD in the lumbar spine (-1.47) compared with patients with incomplete lesions (+0.02). BMD was not significantly influenced by the level of the lesion and the ambulatory status. Long-term monitoring showed significant demineralisation in the proximal femur (r = -0.36) and the distal forearm (r = -0.4), but not in the lumbar spine (r = -0.21). By correlating BMD with clinical parameters, it can be deduced that, firstly, immobilisation after surgical treatment should be reduced to a minimum; secondly, that every effort must be expended to prevent turning an incomplete into a complete lesion; and finally, that rehabilitation treatment should be lifelong.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed2001

Measurement of bone mineral density of lumbar spine and whole body in low-birth-weight infants: comparison of two methods.

In the present study, we compared lumbar spinal and whole-body bone mineral density (BMD) measurements to determine which is more suitable for evaluating the bone mineral status of low-birth-weight (LBW) infants. Lumbar spinal and whole-body BMD were assessed simultaneously in a prospective series including 152 Japanese LBW infants (birth weight 453-2400 g, gestational age 24-38 weeks) from the age of 40 weeks post-conception to 2 years of age. Lumbar spinal BMD at 40 weeks post-conception was significantly correlated with birth weight (r = 0.74; P < 0.0001), but wholebody BMD was not correlated with birth weight. No correlation was found between lumbar spinal and whole-body BMD at 40 weeks post-conception. However, after 40 weeks post-conception, a significant correlation was found between lumbar spinal and whole-body BMD (r = 0.65; P < 0.0001). For infants with a body weight of 4 kg or less at the time of measurement, no correlation was found between lumbar spinal and whole-body BMD. However, for infants with a body weight above 4 kg, a significant correlation was found between lumbar spinal and whole-body BMD (r = 0.65; P < 0.0001). Thus, lumbar spinal BMD is more suitable than whole-body BMD for evaluation of the bone mineral status of LBW in early infancy. Therefore, lumbar spinal BMD should be used for serial evaluation of changes in the bone mineral status of LBW infants.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗