PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10385512

Rapport?

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Arjomand. 1999-06-29. Rapport?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10385512/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Synergy between intracoronary stenting and abciximab in improving angiographic and clinical outcomes of primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction.

This study examined 650 consecutive patients who presented with an acute myocardial infarction and were treated with primary angioplasty within 12 hours of symptom onset between August 1995 and December 1998. Patients were placed into 4 treatment groups depending on the adjunctive therapy they received: group 1, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) ("balloon PTCA alone"; n = 220); group 2, PTCA plus intracoronary stent placement ("stent"; n = 128); group 3, PTCA plus abciximab therapy ("abciximab"; n = 104); and group 4, PTCA plus intracoronary stent placement plus abciximab therapy ("stent/abciximab"; n = 198). The patients' clinical characteristics, severity of disease, and total ischemia time on presentation were similar. At baseline, abciximab and stent/abciximab groups had a higher incidence of thrombus on coronary angiography. Postprocedural quantitative coronary analysis showed a significantly larger minimum luminal diameter in the stent and stent/abciximab groups than PTCA alone. Overall, stents were most efficacious in reducing target vessel revascularization rate, whereas abciximab was associated with a higher postprocedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction-3 trial flow and less "no reflow." The best angiographic result was achieved in the stent/abciximab group. Similarly, the primary combined end point of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization at 30 days was the lowest (6.1%) in the stent/abciximab group. The combination of abciximab and stenting in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction is thus synergistic and is associated with improved angiographic and clinical results at 30-day follow-up.

Abciximab↗

In vivo demonstration of an antithrombin effect of abciximab.

Abciximab prolonged the activated clotting time (ACT) in a post hoc analysis from the Evaluation of IIb/IIIa Platelet Receptor Antagonist 7E3 in Preventing Ischemic Complications trial and an in vitro study has suggested an antithrombin effect of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vivo effects of abciximab on ACT and thrombin generation. In 46 patients undergoing coronary intervention, 24 received heparin and abciximab (group I), whereas 22 received heparin alone (group II). All received the same dose (70 U/kg) of heparin. Heparin was given after a baseline ACT, and in group I, abciximab was administered after the 5-minute ACT. Serial ACTs were recorded at baseline, 5, 10, 20, and every 30 minutes thereafter and at the procedure's end. No intervention including balloon angioplasty was performed until after the 20-minute ACT. The prothrombin fragment F1.2 (Nm/L) was measured at baseline, 20 minutes, and at the end of the procedure. Before (baseline) heparin and at 5 minutes, ACTs were similar. Abciximab prolonged ACT by a mean of 34 to 64 seconds starting with the 10-minute ACT and extending to the 50-minute ACT (all p <0.01 vs heparin alone). There was a progressive decrease in the F1.2 with abciximab, and baseline minus end F1.2 was 0.12 +/- 0.02 in group I versus 0.05 +/- 0.04 in group II, p <0.05. These data indicate a significant in vivo effect of abciximab plus heparin in increasing ACT and decreasing F1.2, results that are consistent with an effect on reducing thrombin generation.

Abciximab↗

Pronounced benefit of coronary stenting and adjunctive platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in complex atherosclerotic lesions.

BACKGROUND: Previous trials testing stents compared with balloon angioplasty excluded patients with complex lesions and did not assess the effect of adjunctive platelet IIb/IIIa inhibition. This analysis sought to assess the effect of stenting and abciximab specifically for patients with complex lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with complex lesions (long, tandem, severely calcified, restenotic, thrombotic, or ostial; total occlusions; bifurcations; saphenous vein grafts; and multivessel interventions) from the Evaluation of PTCA to Improve Long-Term Outcome by c7E3 GP IIb/IIIa Receptor Blockade (EPILOG) and the Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibitor for Stenting (EPISTENT) trials were included in the analysis. The 1-year combined death or myocardial infarction rates in the 4 treatment groups were as follows: balloon angioplasty/placebo, 14.2%; stent/placebo, 15.8%; balloon angioplasty/abciximab, 7.6%; and stent/abciximab, 8.0% (P<0.001). Death rates were 3.2%, 3.1%, 2.1%, and 0.5%, respectively (P=0.03). The incidence of target vessel revascularization at 1 year was 30.5%, 18.0%, 24.4%, and 19.7% in the 4 groups, respectively (P<0.001). After adjustment for baseline differences, multivariate analysis demonstrated that the rate of death or myocardial infarction was independently reduced by balloon angioplasty/abciximab (hazard ratio, 0.51; P<0.001) and stent/abciximab (hazard ratio, 0.60; P=0.02) but was not affected by the use of stents alone. Conversely, target vessel revascularization was reduced by stent/placebo (hazard ratio, 0.53; P<0.001), stent/abciximab (hazard ratio, 0.58; P<0.001), and balloon angioplasty/abciximab (hazard ratio, 0.74; P=0.006) compared with balloon angioplasty/placebo, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of stenting and abciximab during percutaneous coronary interventions for patients with angiographically complex lesions confers additive long-term benefit with respect to death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization.

Abciximab↗