The cervical aortic arch anomaly.

R A Hyman; H L Stein

doi:10.1177/000331977502601007

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 1053585

The cervical aortic arch anomaly.

R A Hyman·H L Stein

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Although the cervical aortic arch anomaly occurs rarely, it should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of pulsatile masses in the neck. The eighteenth case of this anomaly is presented herein. Review of the previous literature demonstrates the consistent pattern of branching anomalies associated with the cervical aortic arch and indicates the complex nature of this anomaly. Studies of these patients in biplane (frontal and lateral), as well as the right posterior oblique projection in order to precisely define the order of branching, is recommended, particularly when surgical intervention is indicated.

Explore related subjects

Aorta, Thoracic Carotid Arteries Child Female Humans Neck Radiography Subclavian Artery Case Reports Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

R A Hyman, H L Stein. 1975. The cervical aortic arch anomaly.. https://doi.org/10.1177/000331977502601007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Hydatid cyst involving the aortic arch.

We report a very rare case of primary mediastinal hydatid cyst which invaded the ascending aorta and the aortic arch which initially presented as a cranial mass. Aortic wall is a very unusual site for the hydatid cysts. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of hydatid cyst located within the aortic arch lumen. Patient underwent ascending aortic and hemiarch replacement under hypothermic circulatory arrest and removal of the cyst. Patient had an uneventful recovery and has been on follow-up. Although the literature data are very limited, we believe that the aortic procedure of choice should be graft interpositon rather than patch repair.

Aorta, Thoracic↗

PubMed2007

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of persistent fifth aortic arch in children.

BACKGROUND: Cine angiography and echocardiography have been utilized to diagnose congenital aortic arch anomalies. However, the visualization of great vessels by echocardiography is limited, while cine angiography requires cardiac catheterization with ionizing radiation. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is a noninvasive modality suitable for visualization of congenital aortic arch anomalies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of contrast-enhanced MRA in the diagnosis of persistent fifth aortic arch, a rare congenital aortic arch anomaly, and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRA with that of echocardiography and cine angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In four pediatric patients, contrast-enhanced MRA studies were performed for diagnosing persistent fifth aortic arch. The findings of MRA were compared with echocardiographic findings and confirmed by cine angiography and operation. RESULTS: Transthoracic surface echocardiography noted an aberrant vessel arising from the ascending aorta in two of four patients; the etiology of this vessel was uncertain. In the other two patients a diagnosis of coarctation was made. Of the four patients, only one was diagnosed with interruption of the aortic arch. Contrast-enhanced MRA clarified uncertain echocardiographic findings, enabling the correct diagnosis of persistent fifth aortic arch with fourth aortic arch interruption in all four patients. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced MRA is a safe, accurate, and fast imaging technique for the evaluation of persistent fifth aortic arch and may obviate the need for conventional cine angiography. Cardiac catheterization may be reserved for some types of complicated congenital heart disease and for obtaining hemodynamic information.

Aorta, Thoracic↗

PubMed2007

Antenatal Doppler measurements and early brain injury in very low birth weight infants.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation between fetoplacental blood flow and brain injury and volumes in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. STUDY DESIGN: Antenatal blood flow from the umbilical artery (UA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), and descending aorta was determined in 70 VLBW infants. The directions of the total diastolic flow of the aortic isthmus and the end-diastolic flow of ductus venosus also were measured. Serial brain ultrasound examinations and MRI at term were performed to assess brain abnormalities. On the basis of brain imaging findings, the newborn infants were classified as normal (n = 14), intermediate brain pathology (n = 31), and major pathology (n = 25) groups. RESULTS: Abnormalities in fetoplacental blood flow were not related to anatomic brain lesions. However, an abnormal UA/MCA pulsatility index ratio was associated with reduced total brain volume (mean, 360 mL; SD, 32.5 mL) and reduced cerebral volume (344 mL; SD, 28.4 mL) compared with infants with normal UA/MCA pulsatility index ratio (mean, 405 mL; SD, 51.3 mL, P = .01, and mean, 368 mL; SD, 52.3 mL, P = .012), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Redistribution of fetal blood flow in VLBW infants is associated with reduced brain volume at term age. Neurodevelopmental follow-up of this cohort will clarify the significance of these blood flow changes on development.

Aorta, Thoracic↗