PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10546519

Sentinel lymph node procedure--a valid selection criterion?

J F Rodier·J C Janser·T Routiot·E David
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Sentinel node biopsy is currently considered to be an outstanding advance in surgical oncology and represents significant evolution toward minimally invasive breast cancer surgery. Detected by blue dye, radiopharmaceutical or combined techniques, the sentinel lymph node can be selectively used for the detection of micrometastasis through extensive histopathologic analysis. Nevertheless, before considering the sentinel lymph node concept as a new standard of care, the standardization of both detection methods and histopathological protocols is of critical importance. The future of this attractive technique is strictly dependent on the quality of teaching, training and evaluation in prospective controlled multicentric studies.

Explore related subjects

BiopsyBreast NeoplasmsDecision MakingFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionLymphatic MetastasisMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresNeoplasm StagingJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J F Rodier, J C Janser, T Routiot, E David. 1999. Sentinel lymph node procedure--a valid selection criterion?. https://doi.org/10.1024/1023-9332.5.5.214

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

K-ras mutation in helicobacter pylori-associated chronic gastritis in patients with and without gastric cancer.

Mutations of an oncogene, K-ras, are associated with the development and progression of many types of human cancer. To elucidate the significance of K-ras mutations in gastric carcinogenesis, we examined K-ras mutations in gastric cancers and in Helicobacter pylori-associated chronic gastritis (H. pylori-CG), which is associated with an increased risk for the gastric cancer development. Specimens of gastric cancer and H. pylori-CG were obtained from 64 gastric cancer patients with H. pylori-CG, 99 cancer-free H. pylori-CG patients and 30 H. pylori-negative healthy subjects. K-ras mutations were examined by polymerase chain reaction-single strand conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP), followed by DNA sequencing analysis. K-ras mutations were detected in 4 of 48 (8.3%) gastric cancers, in 10 of 163 (6.1%) H. pylori-CG and none of the 30 H. pylori-negative healthy subjects. In the gastric cancer patients, mutated K-ras was detected in differentiated type cancers but not in any of the undifferentiated type cancers. K-ras mutations in H. pylori-CG were significantly more frequent in gastric cancer patients than in cancer-free patients (10.9% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.044). In addition, K-ras mutations in H. pylori-CG were significantly more frequent in patients with K-ras mutated gastric cancer than in patients with K-ras unmutated gastric cancer (50.0% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.037). These data suggest that the genetic mechanism(s) of carcinogenesis differs between the differentiated type and the undifferentiated type of gastric cancer and that K-ras mutations may be involved in the early stages of gastric carcinogenesis of the differentiated type.

Biopsy↗
PubMed2002

Tests for equivalence or non-inferiority for paired binary data.

Assessment of therapeutic equivalence or non-inferiority between two medical diagnostic procedures often involves comparisons of the response rates between paired binary endpoints. The commonly used and accepted approach to assessing equivalence is by comparing the asymptotic confidence interval on the difference of two response rates with some clinical meaningful equivalence limits. This paper investigates two asymptotic test statistics, a Wald-type (sample-based) test statistic and a restricted maximum likelihood estimation (RMLE-based) test statistic, to assess equivalence or non-inferiority based on paired binary endpoints. The sample size and power functions of the two tests are derived. The actual type I error and power of the two tests are computed by enumerating the exact probabilities in the rejection region. The results show that the RMLE-based test controls type I error better than the sample-based test. To establish an equivalence between two treatments with a symmetric equivalence limit of 0.15, a minimal sample size of 120 is needed. The RMLE-based test without the continuity correction performs well at the boundary point 0. A numerical example illustrates the proposed procedures.

Biopsy↗
PubMed2002

MIC expression in renal and pancreatic allografts.

BACKGROUND: MHC class I chain-related antigen A (MICA) and MHC class I chain-related antigen B (MICB) are HLA class I related products of polymorphic MHC genes. Constitutive expression in normal tissue is limited to gut epithelium but can be induced in other epithelial cells by stress. Specific antibodies against MICA have been reported in the serum of patients who had rejected kidney allografts, suggesting a potential role for these molecules in transplant immunopathology. However, expression of MICA and MICB in transplanted organs has not been demonstrated. In this study, we report the expression of MICA and MICB in renal and pancreatic allograft biopsies, which were obtained due to clinical signs of rejection. METHODS: A monoclonal antibody directed against MICA and MICB was used to perform indirect immunohistochemistry on formalin fixed, paraffin embedded needle biopsies of kidney and pancreas allografts. The results of staining were then compared to the standard light microscopic evaluation of the biopsies for rejection. RESULTS: A total of 53 individual renal transplant biopsies and 19 pancreas transplant biopsies were assayed for expression of MIC. Histologically, renal biopsies were diagnosed as no rejection, acute tubular necrosis (ATN), acute rejection (AR), chronic rejection (CR), and acute and chronic rejection (ACR). No staining was observed in 7 of 10 kidneys showing no rejection. All 11 of the kidney biopsies with AR were positive, as were the 11 ATN cases, 9 of the 11 kidney biopsies with CR, and 7 of the 10 with ACR. The acini of normal, nontransplanted, pancreas, control specimen were consistently negative; however, islets were positive in all specimens. The acini and islets of five histologically normal pancreas biopsies were positive, as were the four biopsies with AR, seven biopsies with CR, and two with ACR. CONCLUSIONS: MICA and MICB are expressed in epithelial cells in allografted kidney and pancreas that show histologic evidence of rejection and/or cellular injury. In addition to previous findings of alloantibodies against MICA, expression of these gene products may play a role in allograft rejection.

Biopsy↗