PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10554384

Setting the record straight (again).

Abstract

Spiegel's (1998b) further misrepresentations of both social psychological theory and my own social cognitive theory of hypnosis are corrected. There are more points of agreement than differences between Spiegel's position and mine. We agree that (1) role enactment is not a complete explanation of hypnosis or of anything else, (2) people differ in motivations and expectancies, and these differences do not fully account for differences in response, (3) individual differences in response to suggestion are extremely important; indeed, the trait-like character of hypnotic suggestibility was a cornerstone of social psychological theory at its very inception (Sarbin, 1950), and (4) there are physiological differences between high and low suggestible individuals and within high suggestibles when responding to suggestion.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I Kirsch. 1999. Setting the record straight (again).. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1999.10404214

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: emotional and cognitive evaluations of life.

Subjective well-being (SWB), people's emotional and cognitive evaluations of their lives, includes what lay people call happiness, peace, fulfillment, and life satisfaction. Personality dispositions such as extraversion, neuroticism, and self-esteem can markedly influence levels of SWB. Although personality can explain a significant amount of the variability in SWB, life circumstances also influence long-term levels. Cultural variables explain differences in mean levels of SWB and appear to be due to objective factors such as wealth, to norms dictating appropriate feelings and how important SWB is considered to be, and to the relative approach versus avoidance tendencies of societies. Culture can also moderate which variables most influence SWB. Although it is challenging to assess SWB across societies, the measures have some degree of cross-cultural validity. Although nations can be evaluated by their levels of SWB, there are still many open questions in this area.

Cognition↗

[Neurocognitive hypotheses of schizophrenia].

An increasingly important number of studies are reclaiming themes from the fields of the cognitive sciences and the neurosciences. It seems essential, in the face of this multiplication of the lines of research, often very different in their object and their methodology, to recall the general theoretical paradigm of the cognitive sciences, in order to shed light on the links between the different researches and this theoretical model. Moreover, the best validation of a theoretical model remaining in medicine is that of its practical application. It is today fundamental to explore the field of cognitive research for its possible impact on the domains of clinical presentation and management of patients with schizophrenia. This article proposes to address these different points.

Cognition↗