PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10558032

Selecting and implementing a voice recognition system.

Abstract

A single radiology department serves the three separate organizations that comprise Emory Healthcare in Atlanta--three separate hospitals, the Emory Clinic and the Emory University School of Medicine. In 1996, the chairman of Emory Healthcare issued a mandate to the radiology department to decrease its report turnaround time, provide better service and increase customer satisfaction. The area where the greatest effect could be made without involving the transcription area was the "exam complete to dictate" piece of the reporting process. A committee investigating voice recognition systems established an essential criteria for potential vendors--to be able to download patient scheduling and demographic information from the existing RIS to the new system. Second, the system had to be flexible and straightforward for doctors to learn. It must have a word processing package for easy report correction and editing, and a microphone that would rewind and correct dictation before recognition took place. To keep capital costs low for the pilot, the committee opted for server recognition rather than purchase the expensive workstations necessary for real-time recognition. A switch was made later to real-time recognition. PACS and voice recognition have proven to be highly complementary. Most importantly, the new system has had a tremendous impact on turnaround time in the "dictate to final" phase. Once in the 30-hour range, 65 percent of the reports are now turned around in less than 15 minutes, 80 percent in less than 30 minutes, and 90 percent in less than an hour.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Wheeler, G C Cassimus. Selecting and implementing a voice recognition system.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10558032/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A multi-institutional study of Internet utilization by radiation oncology patients.

PURPOSE: Studies describing the use of the Internet by radiation oncology patients are lacking. This multi-institutional study of cancer patients presenting to academic (AC), community (CO), and veterans (VA) radiation oncology centers was designed to analyze the use of the Internet, demographic factors related to utilization, and barriers to access to the Internet. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A questionnaire evaluating the use of the Internet was administered to 921 consecutive patients presenting to radiation oncology centers at AC, CO, and VA medical centers. The study included 436 AC patients (47%), 284 CO patients (31%), and 201 VA patients (22%). A computer was available at home to 427 patients (46%), and 337 patients (37%) had E-mail access. The mean age of the patient population was 64 (range = 14-93). Males represented 70% of the patient population. The most common diagnoses included prostate cancer (33%), breast cancer (13%), and lung cancer (11%). RESULTS: Overall, 265/921 patients (29%) were using the Internet to find cancer-related information. The Internet was used by 42% of AC patients, 25% of CO patients, and only 5% of VA patients (p < 0.0001). A computer was available at home in 62% AC vs. 45% CO vs. 12% VA patients (p < 0.0001). Patients < 60 years were much more likely to use the Internet than older patients (p < 0.0001). Most of the Internet users considered the information either very reliable (22%) or somewhat reliable (70%). Unconventional medical therapies were purchased over the Internet by 12% of computer users. CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of cancer patients seen in radiation oncology departments at academic and community medical centers utilize the Internet to obtain information about cancer. Radiation oncologists must familiarize themselves with this resource because of the large number of patients using the Internet. Veterans lack the computerized access to this information and are thus underserved by this important resource.

Academic Medical Centers↗

Efficacy of IV tissue plasminogen activator in acute stroke: does stroke subtype really matter?

BACKGROUND: The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) trial reported that stroke subtype (e.g., large-artery atherothrombosis, cardioembolism, and lacunae) does not affect response to IV thrombolytic treatment. However, these conclusions were based upon stroke subtypes determined prior to extensive diagnostic evaluation. Because such initial diagnoses are frequently inaccurate, the efficacy of IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) based upon verified specific stroke subtypes remains uncertain. METHODS: The records of consecutive acute stroke patients treated with IV rt-PA at two regional stroke centers were retrospectively reviewed. The final stroke subtype after complete diagnostic evaluation was determined. The relationship between final stroke subtype and response to thrombolytic therapy was then investigated and compared with the results reported in the NINDS trial. RESULTS: Ninety consecutive patients were studied. After adjusting for baseline NIH Stroke Scale scores, no significant difference in final outcome based on confirmed stroke mechanism was identified. CONCLUSIONS: These data are consistent with those of the NINDS trial that reported that the efficacy of IV thrombolysis within the 3-hour time window is similar between different stroke subtypes. Based upon these data, allocating treatment of stroke patients with IV rt-PA based upon presumed stroke mechanism may be unnecessary. Such testing may result in time delays that could compromise the efficacy of treatment.

Academic Medical Centers↗