PubMed · 10610194
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J O'Keefe. 1999. Breaking down old barriers.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10610194/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Dental prophylaxis is a common way to remove dental plaque and stain, both undesirable factors in most dentistry procedures. However, besides cleaning the tooth surface, prophylactic techniques may increase the surface roughness of restorations and dental tissues, which, in turn, may result in plaque accumulation, superficial staining and superficial degradation. This study evaluated the effect of three prophylactic techniques--sodium bicarbonate jet, pumice paste and whiting paste--on the superficial roughness of two restorative materials--a composite resin and a compomer--and on the superficial roughness of two dental surfaces--enamel and cementum/dentin--through rugosimetric and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. Statistical analysis of the rugosimetric data showed that the use of pumice paste on enamel produced a significantly smoother surface than the natural surface. However, comparing the effect of the three techniques, prophylaxis with the pumice paste produced a rougher surface than did the other techniques as regards enamel and cementum/dentin probably due to its abrasiveness. On composite resin, the pumice paste only produced a rougher surface than did the whiting paste. On compomer, all of the applied treatments produced similar results. Based on rugosimetric and SEM analysis, we could conclude that the prophylactic treatments employed did not improve roughness of the studied surfaces. As to the effects of the techniques, they were different depending on the surfaces on which the prophylactic treatments were applied.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the marginal adaptation of prefabricated Class I ceramic inlay restorations placed with various luting materials. METHODS: Forty-two standardized occlusal cavities were prepared in extracted human molars with diamond burs exactly corresponding to the dimensions of prefabricated glass ceramic inlays. The prepared teeth were randomly assigned to seven groups of six teeth each and restored using (1). the composite resin Tetric Ceram in increment technique [Group I] or (2). ceramic inlays (Cerana) luted with: the composite based materials Dual Cement [Gr. II] and Panavia 21 [Gr. III], the compomer material Dyract Cem [Gr. IV], Dyract Cem with additional use of Prime & Bond 2.1 [Gr. V], the silicophosphate cement Trans-Lit [Gr. VI], or the ethylcyanoacrylate Cyano-Veneer [Gr. VII]. Marginal adaptation was evaluated by SEM-analyses before and after thermal cycling (2500 cycles; 5-55 degrees C) and mechanical loading (100N; 500000 cycles) using replica models. Kruskal-Wallis H-test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Group I (increment technique) as well as Groups II-V (inlay technique) revealed high percentages of perfect marginal adaptation in over 95% of the analyzed margins, both before and after thermo-mechanical loading. Statistical significant differences could not be detected within these groups. All inlays luted with silicophosphate cement (Group VI) and four of six inlays applied with Cyano-Veneer (Group VII) fractured under occlusal load. SIGNIFICANCE: A stable bonding to the enamel and to the ceramic inlay was achievable with the composite luting resins Dual Cement and Panavia 21 as well as with the compomer based luting material Dyract Cem but not with the use of the silicophosphate cement Trans-Lit or the ethylcyanoacrylate Cyano-Veneer.
Composite inlays are indicated for large cavities, which frequently extend cervically into dentin. The purpose of this study was to compare in vitro the marginal and internal adaptation of class II fine hybrid composite inlays (Herculite, Kerr) made with or without composite bases, having different physical properties. Freshly extracted human molars were used for this study. The base extended up to the cervical margins on both sides and was made from Revolution (Kerr), Tetric flow (Vivadent), Dyract (Detrey-Dentsply) or Prodigy (Kerr), respectively. Before, during and after mechanical loading (1 million cycles, with a force varying from 50 to 100 N), the proximal margins of the inlay were assessed by scanning electron microscopy. Experimental data were analysed using non-parametric tests. The final percentages of marginal tooth fracture varied from 30.7% (no base) to 37.6% (Dyract). In dentin, percentages of marginal opening varied from 9.2% (Tetric Flow) to 30.1% (Prodigy), however, without significant difference between base products. Mean values of opened internal interface with dentin varied from 11.06% (Tetric Flow) to 28.15% (Prodigy). The present results regarding dentin adaptation confirmed that the physical properties of a base can influence composite inlay adaptation and that the medium-rigid flowable composite Tetric Flow is a potential material to displace, in a coronal position, proximal margins underneath composite inlays.