PubMed · 10632438
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
P G McDonough. 2000. Cycle lumping or--sampling a witches' brew?. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00432-x
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: Hypo-osmotic swelling test (HOST) has been shown to be an effective method for the selection of live sperm. On-going pregnancies were obtained by using HOST-selected sperm. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of using HOST-selected "live" sperm versus nonselected sperm on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles when only nonmotile sperm were available for injection. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SETTING: Governmental tertiary care hospital. PATIENT(S): Thirty ICSI cycles with no motile sperm were included in this study. INTERVENTION(S): For the HOST group, potentially live spermatozoa detected by hypo-osmotic reaction of the tail were injected into oocytes. For the No-HOST group, the sperm were randomly injected into the oocytes without checking the viability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The fertilization, cleavage, embryo quality, pregnancy, and implantation rates were assessed for the two groups. RESULT(S): Among 30 cycles, 15 fall into each group. Fertilization, cleavage rates, and the number of good quality embryos were similar between two groups. CONCLUSION(S): HOST-selected live spermatozoa can be safely used for intracytoplasmic sperm injection to establish pregnancies. There is a tendency for higher pregnancy and implantation rates to result, but it does not reach statistical significance.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
It is believed that delayed transfer of embryos after IVF allows for a better selection of good quality embryos. Hence, the number of embryos and all other prognostic factors being equal, transfer of day 3 embryos should be associated with higher implantation and pregnancy rates than transfer of day 2 embryos. To investigate this hypothesis, a prospective randomized study was carried out to compare implantation and pregnancy rates between day 2 and day 3 transfers. The relationship between the embryo quality score of day 2 and day 3 embryos and their respective implantation rates was also analysed. In a 2 year period all patients undergoing infertility treatment and in whom at least seven normally fertilized oocytes were obtained were included in the study. A minimization procedure was performed taking into account the patient's age and the method of fertilization (IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection). By using a uniform policy of embryo transfer, the number of embryos transferred was similar in both groups. The outcome parameters were embryo quality, implantation and pregnancy rates. No difference was observed in implantation and pregnancy rates between transfers on day 2 versus day 3 (23.8 versus 23.8% and 47.9 versus 46.8% respectively). The incidence of embryos of moderate to poor quality was higher in embryos cultured for 3 days compared with those cultured for 2 days. It is concluded that the outcomes of embryo transfer in terms of implantation and pregnancy rates are comparable for day 2 and day 3 embryos, although the overall embryo quality score decreases when embryos are kept in culture till day 3.