PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10644017

Skin hyporeactivity in relation to patch testing.

Abstract

False-negative patch tests are clinically relevant. Skin hyporeactivity has been suggested as one possible cause. Evidence supports that failure to respond to a specific antigen might be due either to a faulty immune response, a defective inflammatory response or both. Thus, skin hyporeactivity may have clinical relevance in routine patch testing. Articles on this topic are infrequent and there is no index keyword for skin hyporeactivity as this phenomenon is poorly defined and investigated. This article summarizes several observations of skin hyporeactivity, reviews theories of possible mechanisms and discusses further consequences.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A M Koehler, H I Maibach. 2000. Skin hyporeactivity in relation to patch testing.. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.042001001.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The papanicolaou smear: inadequate screening test for bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate the ability of the Papanicolaou smear to identify bacterial vaginosis in comparison with the Amsel clinical criteria. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively identified 159 pregnant women screened for bacterial vaginosis with the Amsel criteria who had a contemporaneous Papanicolaou smear and negative results on screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Bacterial vaginosis was identified in 45 women. We used the McNemar chi(2) test to determine discrepancies between the two screening methods for the detection of bacterial vaginosis. RESULTS: Compared with the Amsel criteria, the sensitivity and specificity of the Papanicolaou smear for yielding a diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis were 49% (95% confidence interval, 36%-64%) and 93% (95% confidence interval, 86%-97%), respectively, with a positive predictive value of 73% and a negative predictive value of 82%. The detection of bacterial vaginosis by Papanicolaou smear was significantly different from that by Amsel criteria (P =. 01). CONCLUSION: The Papanicolaou smear is not a reliable screening test for bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy.

False Negative Reactions↗