PubMed · 10663016
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
W Teichmann, B Herbig. 2000. [Therapy principles in diffuse peritonitis].. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001040051026
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Common methods of benchmarking clinical performance rarely, if ever, account for admission source and, in particular, the effect of a patient being transferred from one medical center to another. Small biases in comparisons of observed versus expected deaths can substantially affect how high-quality institutions compare with peer hospitals. With the most sophisticated and validated set of case-mix measures available for patients, the intensive care unit is an ideal setting in which to study the effect of a patient's being transferred from another hospital. OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of bias in benchmarking outcomes when performance measures do not account for transfer patients' greater severity of illness. DESIGN: Prospectively developed cohort study. SETTING: Medical intensive care unit (MICU) at a tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS: 4579 consecutive admissions for 4208 patients from 1 January 1994 to 1 April 1998. MEASUREMENTS: MICU and hospital lengths of stay, MICU readmission, and hospital mortality rates. RESULTS: Compared with directly admitted patients, MICU patients transferred from another hospital had significantly higher Acute Physiology Scores at the time of admission and discharge (P = 0.001). Even after full adjustment for case mix and severity of illness, transfer patients had a 38% longer MICU stay (95% CI, 32% to 45%), a 41% longer hospital stay (CI, 34% to 50%), and a 2.2 times greater odds of hospital mortality (CI, 1.7 to 2.8) than directly admitted patients. With identical efficiency and quality, a referral hospital with a 25% MICU transfer rate compared with another with a 0% transfer rate would be penalized by 14 excess deaths per 1000 admissions when a benchmarking program adjusts only for case mix and severity of illness and not for the source of admission. CONCLUSIONS: In a setting with the most thorough diagnostic-based, case-mix adjustment and the most physiologically precise severity-of-illness information, accepting transfer patients can adversely affect efficiency and quality benchmarks. Benchmarking and profiling efforts beyond intensive care units must also recognize and account for this phenomenon; otherwise, referral centers may have an incentive to refuse care for patients who could benefit from being transferred to their facility.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of candiduria in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care medical units (ICUs), to identify risk factors for candiduria and to assess the frequency distribution of different Candidaspp. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective cohort observational and multicenter study. A total of 1,765 patients older than 18 years of age who were admitted for at least 7 days to 73 medical-surgical ICUs of 70 Spanish hospitals were included in the study. Urine cultures were performed once a week. RESULTS: In 389 patients (22%), Candidaspp. in one or more urine samples were isolated. In the multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for candiduria included: age >65 years, female sex, length of hospital stay before ICU admission, diabetes mellitus, total parenteral nutrition, mechanical ventilation and previous use of antimicrobials. Candida albicanswas recovered in 266 cases (68.4%), followed by C. glabrata(32 cases, 8.2%) and C. tropicalis(14 cases, 36%). Previous use of antifungal agents was the only risk factor for the selection of Candidanon-albicans candiduria (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.35-5.14, P=0.004). In-hospital mortality was 48.8% in patients with candiduria compared to 36.6% in those without candiduria ( P<0.001). Significant differences were also found for ICU mortality (38.% vs. 28.1%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-two percent of critically ill patients admitted for more than 7 days in the ICU developed candiduria. C. albicanswas the most frequent causative pathogen. Previous use of antifungals was the only risk factor for the selection of Candidanon-albicans.
Major trauma is associated with a decreased capacity of patients' leukocytes to produce proinflammatory cytokines on in vitro stimulation. We studied leukocytes from 48 patients with trauma and showed that this hyporeactivity was restricted to gram-negative bacteria, Escherichia coli endotoxin, and unmethylated bacterial DNA, whereas Leptospira interrogans endotoxin-induced tumor necrosis factor production was similar to that observed with healthy donors. As well, tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-6 production in response to gram-positive bacteria was not altered. The expression of toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 was not reduced on patients' monocytes as compared with healthy control subjects, whereas that of TLR4 was reduced. However, the hyporeactivity to gram-negative bacteria and E. coli endotoxin cannot be fully explained by the downregulation of TLR4. Indeed, unlike proinflammatory cytokines, after stimulation with these microbial products the release of antiinflammatory cytokines was increased as compared with healthy control subjects. The increased interleukin-10 production was analyzed in terms of intracellular signaling in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with trauma: our results suggest the involvement of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, Sp-1 transcription factor, heterotrimeric Gi protein, and phosphatidylinositol-3'-kinase. In conclusion, the immunodysregulation described for patients with trauma is not a generalized phenomenon but depends on the stimulus and the signaling pathway.