Problems in cranio-facial surgery.

L A Whitaker; I R Munro; I T Jackson; K E Salyer

doi:10.1016/s0301-0503(76)80021-5

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 1066411

Problems in cranio-facial surgery.

L A Whitaker·I R Munro·I T Jackson·K E Salyer

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Four geographically widely separated medical centres with a primary interest in cranio-facial surgery present their combined complications to illustrate the dangers and unsolved problems of this surgery. There wre 149 cases with 2 deaths and 3 other life threatening situations (infections). Approximately 60% of the patients had no complications (90/149). Secondary corrections are often necessary to obtain the desired result or correct problems produced by the surgery. The complexity and rarity of the surgery and supporting disciplines is such that in the interest of the patient and the speciality concentration of this surgery in a few centres is desirable.

Explore related subjects

Bone Resorption Dura Mater Eye Diseases Eye Injuries Face Hemorrhage Humans Infections Necrosis Orbit Postoperative Complications Recurrence Skin Diseases Skull Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

L A Whitaker, I R Munro, I T Jackson, K E Salyer. 1976-05-01. Problems in cranio-facial surgery.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-0503(76)80021-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

A new reconstructive technique for intercalary defects of long bones: the association of massive allograft with vascularized fibular autograft. Long-term results and comparison with alternative techniques.

In 1988, the excellent results obtained with the use of vascularized fibular autograft as a salvage procedure in massive allograft failures caused by non-union or massive resorption prompted a trial of an original reconstructive technique for intercalary defects based on the primary combination of the two types of graft. The authors believe the excellent final results and the ability to avoid further salvage surgical procedures justify the primary application of this more complicated technique despite longer surgical times.

Bone Resorption↗

PubMed2006

FSH and bone--important physiology or not?

For many years, osteoporosis in women was equated with estrogen deficiency. The recent articles by Zaidi and colleagues offer a new challenge to the estrogen-deficiency-osteoporosis hypothesis by showing that follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) stimulates osteoclastic bone resorption perhaps through tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). These authors, however, neglected to mention bone abnormalities and high testosterone levels that were previously shown in FSH-receptor knockout and other modified mice. It is also possible that they have overemphasized potential relationships of these new data with human bone loss. Despite these fascinating data, the paradigm of FSH causing hypogonadal bone loss is not yet ready to displace the estrogen-deficiency-osteoporosis paradigm, although that model already faces considerable challenge.

Bone Resorption↗

PubMed2006

Natural inhibitors targeting osteoclast-mediated bone resorption.

Human cathepsin K, matrix metalloproteinase 9, and alpha(V)beta(3) integrin are the key regulators in osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. In this paper, we found natural inhibitors 1-10 for them by enzyme inhibition assays. Inhibitors 1-7, 8-9, and 10 are novel inhibitors of human cathepsin K, matrix metalloproteinase 9, and alpha(V)beta(3), respectively.

Bone Resorption↗