PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10666876

[Pre-eclampsia and anesthesia].

T Grau·R Conradi·J Wacker·E Martin
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The management of anaesthesia in patients suffering preeclampsia has to be selected individually. There is a high rate of caesarean sections in patients with preeclampsia. Intubation anaesthesia or regional anaesthesia are commonly used methods and can be considered comparable and equally useful. In our opinion, the application of regional anaesthesia should be preferred, if the initial criteria, such as normal neurologic status and blood coagulation, are fulfilled. We believe in a considerable reduction of vital risks when using regional anaesthesia. Our aim was to figure out the risk-factors of preeclampsia and preterm maturity regarding anaesthesia management. Preeclampsia is a severe illness in pregnancy with a frequency of 5-10%. In 1997, we experienced 73 patients with praeeclampsia according to the definition of ISSPH. Mode of delivery was conventional in 10 patients, 2 patients had a vacuum extraction and 61 patients needed a caesarean section. The rate of epidural anesthesia for delivery was 51%. We used epidural anaesthesia in 6 spontaneous deliveries, in 2 vacuum extractions and in 30 caesarean sections. There were no problems with epidural anaesthesia and the outcome of mother and child was also considered to be excellent. We suggest to use regional anesthesia techniques whenever possible.

Explore related subjects

Anesthesia, ConductionAnesthesia, EndotrachealAnesthesia, EpiduralAnesthesia, ObstetricalBlood PressureCesarean SectionFemaleHeart RateHumansInfant, NewbornPre-EclampsiaPregnancyRisk FactorsVacuum Extraction, ObstetricalEnglish AbstractJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Grau, R Conradi, J Wacker, E Martin. 1999. [Pre-eclampsia and anesthesia].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10666876/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

Complications of regional anesthesia: an overview.

Perhaps the clearest picture of the numbers and types of injuries from regional anesthesia is provided by the ASA Closed Claims Project database. In reviewing these data, it is valuable to keep in mind, of course, that the lack of a denominator makes the calculation of incidence impossible. For the decade of the 1990s, 308 claims were associated with regional anesthesia (versus 642 claims associated with general anesthesia). The percentage of these claims for patient death (10%) continued its steady decline from more than 20% in the 1970s and 13% in the 1980s. The primary reason for death remains cardiac arrest associated with neuraxial blockade, though this now represents only 30% of the deaths as opposed to 61% in the 1970s and 40% in the 1980s. There were 71 permanent disabling injuries among the 308 claims. The most common of these (23%) was associated with nerve blocks of the eye (13 retrobulbar, 3 peribulbar), and typically the injury entailed loss of vision. Second in frequency (21%) were pain-management related claims involving, for example, neuraxial opiates or neurolytic blocks. Third in frequency (20%) were nerve injuries associated with neuraxial and peripheral blocks followed by epidural hematomas (13%).

Anesthesia, Conduction↗
PubMed2002

Gaston Labat, John Lundy, Emery Rovenstine, and the Mayo Clinic: the spread of regional anesthesia in America between the World Wars.

The spread of regional anesthesia in America was greatly facilitated by the work of Gaston Labat. Recruited to work at the Mayo Clinic, Dr. Labat there published his seminal textbook, Regional Anesthesia, in which he laid out his techniques to the next generation of physician specialists, notably John Lundy, Ralph Waters, and Emery Rovenstine. It was Rovenstine who was responsible for creating the specialty of anesthesiology in the 1920s and 1930s. John Lundy continued Labat's work at the Mayo Clinic when Labat left for Bellevue Hospital in New York. There, while teaching, Labat further developed and refined his techniques for delivering regional anesthesia.

Anesthesia, Conduction↗
PubMed2002

Single injection digital block: comparison between three techniques.

INTRODUCTION: Regional anesthesia of a single finger is commonly achieved by the traditional ring block. The major drawback of this technique is the need for at least two painful injections in the digit. Single injection techniques have been described. A comparison of their results could help health professionals select the most appropriate technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective randomized study was designed to compare three techniques in term of patient tolerance, distribution of anesthesia and efficiency: the modified transthecal digital block, the subcutaneous digital block and a combination of the two. Digits were randomized in three groups (n = 30). Blocks were performed by a single investigator. A visual analogic scale was used to evaluate pain associated with the injection. Prick-testing was used to evaluate anesthesia at the volar and dorsal aspects of the phalanxes. Statistical analysis of the results was performed. RESULTS: All techniques allowed surgery to be performed without complementary injection most of the time (25/30). The dorsum of the proximal phalanx, however, was unpredictably included in the anesthetized territory. The highest rate of full digital block was achieved with the combined technique. DISCUSSION: The least invasive of equally effective techniques should be considered as the first choice. The subcutaneous single injection digital block is safe, efficient and easy to perform. It allows treatment of all conditions on the volar aspect of the finger and on the dorsal aspect of the distal and middle phalanxes. For surgery on the dorsal aspect of the proximal phalanx, a supplementary dorsal block should be used.

Anesthesia, Conduction↗