PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10696706

Phase response curve based model of the SA node: simulation by two-dimensional array of pacemaker cells with randomly distributed cycle lengths.

S Abramovich-Sivan·S Akselrod
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A simulation of the SA node is presented, based on a 2D array (15 x 15) model of randomly distributed pacemaker cells, interacting via a phase response curve (PRC). The model involves only the basic properties that play a direct role in the determination of the SA node rhythm: intrinsic cycle length and PRC. The PRC reflects the 'type' of interaction of each pacemaker cell with the outside world (neighbouring cells, external stimulus, etc.). A major outcome of this study is the demonstration that global dynamics and the degree of 'disorder' of the SA node are strongly affected by the cycle length distribution of the model, as well as spatial inhomogeneity in the cell-to-cell 'electrical' coupling (PRC). Those factors also determine the conduction velocity throughout the SA node and may therefore be responsible for anisotropic conduction. For example, lowering the PRC parameters (d and a) by 25% increases the array activation time from 46 to 126 ms. The model also responds appropriately to a perturbation such as a vagal pulse. This pulse produces a shift of the dominant pacemaker to another site in the array and a transient lengthening of the array cycle length, for example from 312 to 355 ms.

Explore related subjects

Biological ClocksComputer SimulationElectrocardiographyHumansModels, CardiovascularSinoatrial NodeJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Abramovich-Sivan, S Akselrod. 1999. Phase response curve based model of the SA node: simulation by two-dimensional array of pacemaker cells with randomly distributed cycle lengths.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02513334

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

[Role of Ca(2+) in the pacemaker-like property of spinal motoneurons].

It is generally accepted that locomotion in vertebrate species is produced by signals coded and integrated by neurons of the spinal cord. In fact, the basic features of locomotion, including patterns and rhythms, are generated by a network of neurons called the CPG (central pattern generator) essentially localized in the lumbar segments of the spinal cord. However, the detailed mechanisms underlying the rhythmic aspect of CPG-generated locomotion are not fully understood. Here, we report data of studies that focus on the role of Ca(2+)-related mechanisms involved in the expression of the pacemaker property of lumbar motoneurons that innervate the hindlimbs. In fact, it has become increasingly clear that Ca(2+) plays a determinant function in the expression of this active and conditional rhythmic property. In addition to NMDA-mediated currents (NMDA is an agonist of the calcium permeable ionotropic glutamatergic receptor) and to a Ca(2+)-dependent K(+) current that were found twenty years ago to contribute to intrinsic voltage oscillations in motoneurons, a pivotal role for voltage-gated channels (e.g., CaV1.3) and intracellular Ca(2+) concentrations ([Ca(2+)]i) have recently been shown. Increasing evidence of a role for metabotropic receptor subtypes, calmodulin (a calcium binding protein), ryanodine and IP3-sensitive intracellular stores of Ca(2+) suggests that additional mechanisms are yet to be identified. A detailed understanding of the complex role of Ca(2+) in mediating the auto-rhythmic property of spinal neurons may contribute to the development of novel therapeutic approaches to induce locomotion after spinal cord injury.

Biological Clocks↗
PubMed2007

Gates and oscillators II: zeitgebers and the network model of the brain clock.

Circadian rhythms in physiology and behavior are regulated by the SCN. When assessed by expression of clock genes, at least 2 distinct functional cell types are discernible within the SCN: nonrhythmic, light-inducible, retinorecipient cells and rhythmic autonomous oscillator cells that are not directly retinorecipient. To predict the responses of the circadian system, the authors have proposed a model based on these biological properties. In this model, output of rhythmic oscillator cells regulates the activity of the gate cells. The gate cells provide a daily organizing signal that maintains phase coherence among the oscillator cells. In the absence of external stimuli, this arrangement yields a multicomponent system capable of producing a self-sustained consensus rhythm. This follow-up study considers how the system responds when the gate cells are activated by an external stimulus, simulating a response to an entraining (or phase-setting) signal. In this model, the authors find that the system can be entrained to periods within the circadian range, that the free-running system can be phase shifted by timed activation of the gate, and that the phase response curve for activation is similar to that observed when animals are exposed to a light pulse. Finally, exogenous triggering of the gate over a number of days can organize an arrhythmic system, simulating the light-dependent reappearance of rhythmicity in a population of disorganized, independent oscillators. The model demonstrates that a single mechanism (i.e., the output of gate cells) can account for not only free-running and entrained rhythmicity but also other circadian phenomena, including limits of entrainment, a PRC with both delay and advance zones, and the light-dependent reappearance of rhythmicity in an arrhythmic animal.

Biological Clocks↗