PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10702645

Differentiation mechanisms and malignancy.

Abstract

This review considers the relationship between differentiation mechanisms and the genesis and maintenance of tumor phenotype. To a certain extent, carcinomas preserve differentiation markers of normal tissue, and hemoblastoses precisely reflect the direction and differentiation level of their precursor cells. Both tumor types retain the ability to differentiate. Mechanisms of T and B cell differentiation are reviewed considering the activation of protooncogenes by translocation to the region of tissue-specific genes including the immunoglobulin (Ig) and T cell receptor (TCR) genes. Apart from the classical oncogenes (MYC, PRAD, BCL-2), heterologous differentiation of trans-factors can be activated in a similar manner. Their activation at inappropriate time and place induces oncogenic transformation in a number of hemoblastoses. Chimeric genes and fused proteins are analyzed, including their genesis by specific translocation resulting in transformation and their role in differentiation and maintenance of the tumor phenotype. Induction of terminal differentiation in leukemia can have significant therapeutic effect. These hemoblastoses include hairy cell leukemia, promyelocytic leukemia, and in part chronic myeloid leukemia. Specific attention is given to the role of intercellular interactions in the control of tumor growth and maintenance of a differentiated state of the cells. It is suggested that alterations in these interactions during tumor progression simultaneously stimulate malignant growth and decrease differentiation level, thus inducing re-expression of embryonic antigens in the tumors.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G I Abelev. 2000. Differentiation mechanisms and malignancy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10702645/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Gastric amphicrine carcinoma in the stomach: an unexpected presentation of MUTYH-associated polyposis.

Amphicrine carcinomas of the stomach, defined by dual exocrine and neuroendocrine differentiation within the same neoplastic cell, are exceedingly rare. MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) is an autosomal recessive polyposis syndrome characterized by multiple colorectal adenomas and variable upper gastrointestinal involvement; however, amphicrine carcinomas have not been previously documented in this setting. We report a gastric amphicrine carcinoma arising in the background of extensive fundic gland polyposis in a patient with MAP. Endoscopy revealed a 3.5-cm flat elevated lesion in the gastric fundus amid extensive fundic gland polyposis. Histologically, the tumor consisted of a single population of cells exhibiting combined glandular and neuroendocrine differentiation without zonal or biphasic architecture, and many of these cells demonstrated true amphicrine morphology. Immunohistochemistry confirmed co-expression of cytokeratin and the neuroendocrine markers chromogranin A and synaptophysin in the same cell population. Germline targeted next-generation sequencing identified biallelic MUTYH variants in trans (c.733C>T, p.Arg245Cys [likely pathogenic]; c.842C>T, p.Ala281Val [variant of uncertain significance]), supporting a diagnosis of MAP. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a gastric amphicrine carcinoma in a MAP patient, expanding the spectrum of MAP-associated upper gastrointestinal neoplasia and underscoring the importance of vigilant endoscopic surveillance in hereditary polyposis syndromes.

Carcinoma↗

Perioperative outcomes of cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for non-appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis from a prospective database.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy has expanded its application in the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastrointestinal and ovarian malignancies. An accurate assessment of perioperative outcomes is crucial for integration of this combined procedure into clinical practice. METHODS: A prospective study of 80 patients undergoing the combined treatment for non-appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis was conducted. Forty-seven adverse events by eight organ-systems were rated from Grade I to IV with increasing severity. RESULTS: One patient (1.3%) died postoperatively. Postoperative adverse events affected genitourinary system (38%), hematological system (31%), gastrointestinal system (25%), infection (20%), intravenous catheters status (15%), pulmonary system (14%), cardiovascular system (11%) and neurological system (4%). Thirty-six patients (45%) experienced 49 Grade III adverse events. Six patients (8%) experienced eight Grade IV adverse events. More than four peritonectomy procedures (P = 0.010), and length of hospital stay of more than 21 days (P = 0.007) were strongly associated with Grade III and/or Grade IV morbidity. CONCLUSION: The morbidity and mortality rates after the combined treatment for non-appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis were within the acceptable range of surgical treatments for other gastrointestinal cancers. A standardized prospective database is required for an accurate assessment of perioperative outcomes.

Carcinoma↗

Parity, tubal sterilization, hysterectomy and risk of primary fallopian tube carcinoma in Finland, 1975-2004.

We studied the possible relationship among parity, female sterilization, hysterectomy and the risk of primary fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC) in a case-control study in Finland in cases occurring between 1975 and 2004. A total of 573 PFTC cases were identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry, and 10 age-matched controls per case were randomly selected from the Finnish Central Population Registry. In multivariate analysis (including 189 PFTC cases and 1764 controls) parity was protective: the odds ratio (OR) for 1-2 deliveries was 0.63 (95% CI 0.44-0.91) and for > or =3 deliveries, 0.32 (95% CI 0.19-0.52). The OR for sterilization was 0.74 (95% CI 0.42-1.30) and for hysterectomy 1.27 (95% CI 0.73-2.21). Our findings suggest a possible hormonal background as regards the development of PFTC.

Carcinoma↗