PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10703375

Tracking case management accountability: a systems approach.

A J Frankel·H Heft-LaPorte
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A review of the evaluation of case management programs in the last two decades reveals a lack of consistency in showing outcome effectiveness. In addition, program evaluation models do not reflect the most prevalent theoretical foundation of case management practice, systems theory. It was the purpose of this article to conceptually establish an evaluation model that reflects systems theory in case management practice, to develop evaluation instruments congruent to collecting data in this model, and then to field-test this evaluation model.

Explore related subjects

Case ManagementData CollectionGoalsHumansJob DescriptionModels, TheoreticalOrganizational ObjectivesOutcome Assessment, Health CarePilot ProjectsProgram EvaluationSocial WorkSystems AnalysisSystems TheoryTime and Motion StudiesWorkloadJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A J Frankel, H Heft-LaPorte. 1998. Tracking case management accountability: a systems approach.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10703375/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

A comparison of assertive community treatment and intensive case management for patients in rural areas.

OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the evidence for the effectiveness of community-based services for rural areas, specifically assertive community treatment and intensive case management. Service delivery to persons with severe mental illness in rural areas is challenged by low population densities, limited services, and shortages of professionals. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search identified six studies of rural assertive community treatment, only two of which were controlled studies, and four rural intensive case management studies, only one of which was a controlled study. Assertive community treatment would seem ideally suited to areas lacking services because of its self-contained multidisciplinary treatment team approach. However, rural programs have been forced to make several adaptations to the assertive community treatment model, including smaller teams, less comprehensive staff, and less intensive services. There is no published evidence that these adaptations are able to produce the same results as full-fidelity teams. Some believe that intensive case management may be an alternative to assertive community treatment in rural settings because intensive case management emphasizes individual caseloads, fewer staff, less intensive contacts, and brokered services. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence suggests that intensive case management programs are effective only in community settings where there is an ample supply of treatment and support services. To build the evidence base for the effectiveness of these models, much more attention needs to be focused on evaluating the current wave of assertive community treatment and intensive case management dissemination in rural areas.

Case Management↗
PubMed2007

Factors associated with specific language impairment and later language development during early life: a literature review.

It has been reported that 50% of children with specific language impairment (SLI) have persistent SLI, which has been associated with various risk factors. To date, however, there has not been a comprehensive review of studies into different risk factors that could be used by clinicians to facilitate parental counseling and individual case-management. Several studies about the factors associated with SLI were reviewed based on study design. This article presents a review of factors associated with later language development and SLI, and reviews the risk for children who have SLI during early life. The summary provides data including specific biologic and environmental factors that are significantly associated with SLI, to ensure early intervention for children with SLI in the presence of identified risk factors.

Case Management↗