PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10718677

Database for a hearing conservation program.

I V Pyykkö·E M Toppila·J P Starck·M Juhola·Y Auramo
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We have developed a database and an analysis program (NoiseScan) for noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). The exposure data are based on the evaluation of the noise immission level, which includes duration, frequency content, and the use of, and the attenuation performance of, hearing protectors. The input data can handle an unlimited number of exposure periods. If the noise exposure level is not known, the program lists noise levels of comparable work places, and thus provides an estimate of exposure. Confounding medical factors that may contribute to NIHL, such as elevated serum cholesterol level, hypertension, and extensive use of pain killers, are collected. Combined exposure to agents that clearly contribute to NIHL, such as hand-arm vibration, tobacco smoking, use of aminoglycosides and exposure to solvents are also assessed. An unlimited number of audiograms can be stored, and all the data can be completed and edited following collection. The program gives the predicted hearing loss according to the ISO 1999 model based on total exposure. At present, our NoiseScan program (under continuous development in an EU research program) is suitable for the data collection of various risk factors. It can be used to determine whether the hearing loss is occupational in origin and to estimate the efficiency of hearing conservation measures. NoiseScan also predicts the development of hearing loss in individuals in 5-year periods. The goal is to improve and validate the rules by which single and combined risk factors contribute to HIHL, thus leading to more precise prediction of individual hearing loss, and for the evaluation of success of the hearing conservation programs.

Explore related subjects

AudiometryDatabases as TopicEar Protective DevicesHearingHearing Loss, Noise-InducedHumansNoiseOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I V Pyykkö, E M Toppila, J P Starck, M Juhola, Y Auramo. 2000. Database for a hearing conservation program.. https://doi.org/10.1080/010503900424606

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

Hearing habilitation with auditory brainstem implantation in two children with cochlear nerve aplasia.

Patients with aplasia and hypoplasia of the cochlear nerve have no chance of having their hearing restored by stimulating the periphery of the auditory system using the traditional cochlear implant. A possible approach to auditory rehabilitation may be direct electrical stimulation of the cochlear nuclei with an auditory brainstem implant (ABI). Recently, two children, aged 4 and 3 years, respectively, with bilateral severe cochlear malformations and cochlear nerve aplasia received an ABI. The present paper reports the technique and the preliminary results of this experience. The classic retrosigmoid approach was used. The correct position of the electrodes was estimated with the aid of EABRs and neural response telemetry (NRT). No postoperative complications were observed. High-resolution CT scans with a bone algorithm reconstruction technique were taken postoperatively to evaluate electrode placement before discharge. The ABI was activated 30 days after implantation in both patients. To date 16 and 13 electrodes, respectively, have been activated in the two children. Three months after activation the first patient had achieved good environmental sound awareness, good speech detection and some speech discrimination. The second child, 1 month after activation, had achieved good environmental sound awareness and moderate speech detection. To the best of our knowledge this is the first report of patients with hypoplasia of the cochlea and aplasia of the cochlear nerve, aged below 5 years and treated with an ABI.

Audiometry↗
PubMed2001

Volunteer-based universal newborn hearing screening program.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy and costs of a volunteer-based universal newborn hearing screening program. METHODS: The Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford newborn hearing screening program database was reviewed. Results and costs of the hearing screens were analyzed. RESULTS: Hearing screens were performed on 5771 newborns treated in the well-baby nursery and nine infants from this population were identified with hearing loss, seven of whom had no risks factors for hearing loss. Using volunteers to perform the first-line screen with the automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) technology, 91% of infants registered for screening were evaluated prior to discharge. An additional 4% of infants were screened as outpatients. If an infant failed the AABR on two occasions, he or she was rescreened with the AABR or transient evoked otoacoustic emissions by a licensed audiologist, often while the infant was still in the hospital. Using this algorithm, 5% of infants tested in the well-baby nursery needed additional follow-up as an outpatient. Cost analysis of this volunteer-based program reveals a per/baby screening cost of $27.41. CONCLUSIONS: A volunteer-based hearing screening program is a viable option for hearing screening in well-baby nurseries but does not result in significant cost savings during the first 2 years of the program.

Audiometry↗
PubMed2001

Hearing loss in speech-language delayed children.

An infant begins to communicate with his/her environment from the first months of life. However, true words do not appear until the age of 12-15 months, following a rather predictable sequence. Delay or failure of normal language development is not a rare situation in childhood and may be due to a variety of reasons. Among these, hearing undoubtedly plays a leading part in the language acquisition process. The purpose of this study was to assess the percentage of hearing-impaired children in a group of phenotypically healthy children presenting with speech-language delay. Between March 1993 and March 1999, 726 speech-language delayed children were examined in our department. In 72 of them, various diseases or syndromes had already been diagnosed and so they were excluded from the study. The remaining 654 apparently healthy children entered the study and underwent a thorough audiological assessment for determination of their hearing thresholds. Eighty-seven children (13.3%) showed various degrees of hearing loss. Most of them (55 children, 8.4%) suffered from sensorineural hearing impairment, while in 32 children (4.9%) a conductive hearing loss was discovered. The increased prevalence of hearing impairment found in our population mandates a thorough hearing evaluation for every case of speech-language delay, even for those children who show no evidence of other handicaps. This will help in the early diagnosis of hearing loss, allowing proper management to be instituted as early as possible.

Audiometry↗